Towards Measuring Ethicality of an Intelligent Assistive System
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03929v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 14:59:17 GMT
- Title: Towards Measuring Ethicality of an Intelligent Assistive System
- Authors: M. Salman Shaukat and J.-C. P\~oder and Sebastian Bader and Thomas
Kirste
- Abstract summary: The presence of autonomous entities poses ethical challenges concerning the stakeholders involved in using these systems.
There is a lack of research when it comes to analysing how such IAT adheres to provided ethical regulations.
We present a method to measure the ethicality of an assistive system.
- Score: 1.2961180148172198
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) based assistive systems, so called intelligent
assistive technology (IAT) are becoming increasingly ubiquitous by each day.
IAT helps people in improving their quality of life by providing intelligent
assistance based on the provided data. A few examples of such IATs include
self-driving cars, robot assistants and smart-health management solutions.
However, the presence of such autonomous entities poses ethical challenges
concerning the stakeholders involved in using these systems. There is a lack of
research when it comes to analysing how such IAT adheres to provided ethical
regulations due to ethical, logistic and cost issues associated with such an
analysis. In the light of the above-mentioned problem statement and issues, we
present a method to measure the ethicality of an assistive system. To perform
this task, we utilised our simulation tool that focuses on modelling navigation
and assistance of Persons with Dementia (PwD) in indoor environments. By
utilising this tool, we analyse how well different assistive strategies adhere
to provided ethical regulations such as autonomy, justice and beneficence of
the stakeholders.
Related papers
- Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs.
We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z) - Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)
It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures.
The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z) - Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial
Intelligence [0.08192907805418582]
This study attempts to identify the major ethical principles influencing the utility performance of AI at different technological levels.
Justice, privacy, bias, lack of regulations, risks, and interpretability are the most important principles to consider for ethical AI.
We propose a new utilitarian ethics-based theoretical framework for designing ethical AI for the healthcare domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-26T02:10:58Z) - Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous
AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape.
This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z) - AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance.
We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks.
Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z) - Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research.
An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system.
We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z) - Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering.
In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z) - Intelligent Decision Assistance Versus Automated Decision-Making:
Enhancing Knowledge Work Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
We propose a new class of DSS, namely Intelligent Decision Assistance (IDA)
IDA supports knowledge workers without influencing them through automated decision-making.
Specifically, we propose to use techniques of Explainable AI (XAI) while withholding concrete AI recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-28T15:57:21Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Toward a Rational and Ethical Sociotechnical System of Autonomous
Vehicles: A Novel Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [0.0]
The expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems has shown the potential to generate enormous social good.
There is a pressing need to address relevant social concerns to allow for the development of systems of intelligent agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-04T23:52:31Z) - Trustworthy AI in the Age of Pervasive Computing and Big Data [22.92621391190282]
We formalise the requirements of trustworthy AI systems through an ethics perspective.
After discussing the state of research and the remaining challenges, we show how a concrete use-case in smart cities can benefit from these methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-30T08:09:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.