Related papers: Making a Computational Attorney

Making a Computational Attorney

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05383v1
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:44:29 GMT
Title: Making a Computational Attorney
Authors: Dell Zhang, Frank Schilder, Jack G. Conrad, Masoud Makrehchi, David von Rickenbach, Isabelle Moulinier
Abstract summary: This "blue sky idea" paper outlines the opportunities and challenges in data mining and machine learning involving making a computational attorney. We discuss what a ChatGPT-like Large Legal Language Model (L$3$M) can and cannot do today, which will inspire researchers with promising short-term and long-term research objectives.
Score: 5.613948524398325
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: This "blue sky idea" paper outlines the opportunities and challenges in data mining and machine learning involving making a computational attorney -- an intelligent software agent capable of helping human lawyers with a wide range of complex high-level legal tasks such as drafting legal briefs for the prosecution or defense in court. In particular, we discuss what a ChatGPT-like Large Legal Language Model (L$^3$M) can and cannot do today, which will inspire researchers with promising short-term and long-term research objectives.

Related papers

AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents [26.268925743738855]
We present a simulation system called AgentCourt that simulates the entire courtroom process. Our core goal is to enable lawyer agents to learn how to argue a case, as well as improving their overall legal skills. Experiments show that after two lawyer-agents have engaged in a thousand adversarial legal cases in AgentCourt, the evolved lawyer agents exhibit consistent improvement in their ability to handle legal tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T11:33:20Z)
Human Centered AI for Indian Legal Text Analytics [5.162515210222778]
This position paper explores the potential of Large Language Models within Legal Text Analytics (LTA) We introduce a novel dataset and describe a human centered, compound AI system that principally incorporates human inputs for performing LTA tasks with LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-16T15:17:13Z)
The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors [58.81546227716182]
We argue that automating the role of the judge raises difficult ethical challenges, in particular for common law legal systems. Our argument follows from the social role of the judge in actively shaping the law, rather than merely applying it. Even in the case the models could achieve human-level capabilities, there would still be remaining ethical concerns inherent in the automation of the legal process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T13:48:46Z)
Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw) A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z)
Interpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [10.834755282333589]
Long-form Legal Question Answering dataset comprises 1,868 expert-annotated legal questions in the French language. Our experimental results demonstrate promising performance on automatic evaluation metrics. As one of the only comprehensive, expert-annotated long-form LQA dataset, LLeQA has the potential to not only accelerate research towards resolving a significant real-world issue, but also act as a rigorous benchmark for evaluating NLP models in specialized domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T08:23:19Z)
SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system. Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures. We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z)
An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documents [56.40163943394202]
We release the Longformer-based pre-trained language model, named as Lawformer, for Chinese legal long documents understanding. We evaluate Lawformer on a variety of LegalAI tasks, including judgment prediction, similar case retrieval, legal reading comprehension, and legal question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-09T09:39:25Z)
How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.