Importance Filtering with Risk Models for Complex Driving Situations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06935v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:03:10 GMT
• Title: Importance Filtering with Risk Models for Complex Driving Situations
• Authors: Tim Puphal, Raphael Wenzel, Benedict Flade, Malte Probst and Julian Eggert
• Abstract summary: Self-driving cars face complex driving situations with a large amount of agents when moving in crowded cities. Some of the agents are actually not influencing the behavior of the self-driving car. filtering out unimportant agents would inherently simplify the behavior or motion planning task for the system.
• Score: 1.4699455652461728
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-driving cars face complex driving situations with a large amount of agents when moving in crowded cities. However, some of the agents are actually not influencing the behavior of the self-driving car. Filtering out unimportant agents would inherently simplify the behavior or motion planning task for the system. The planning system can then focus on fewer agents to find optimal behavior solutions for the ego~agent. This is helpful especially in terms of computational efficiency. In this paper, therefore, the research topic of importance filtering with driving risk models is introduced. We give an overview of state-of-the-art risk models and present newly adapted risk models for filtering. Their capability to filter out surrounding unimportant agents is compared in a large-scale experiment. As it turns out, the novel trajectory distance balances performance, robustness and efficiency well. Based on the results, we can further derive a novel filter architecture with multiple filter steps, for which risk models are recommended for each step, to further improve the robustness. We are confident that this will enable current behavior planning systems to better solve complex situations in everyday driving.

Related papers

• Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
  This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• Introducing Risk Shadowing For Decisive and Comfortable Behavior Planning [0.0]
  We develop risk shadowing, a situation understanding method that allows us to go beyond single interactions. We show that using risk shadowing as an upstream filter module for a behavior planner allows to plan more decisive and comfortable driving strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T09:16:01Z)
• Augmented Driver Behavior Models for High-Fidelity Simulation Study of Crash Detection Algorithms [2.064612766965483]
  We present a simulation platform for a hybrid transportation system that includes both human-driven and automated vehicles. We decompose the human driving task and offer a modular approach to simulating a large-scale traffic scenario. We analyze a large driving dataset to extract expressive parameters that would best describe different driving characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T19:59:16Z)
• Calibration of Human Driving Behavior and Preference Using Naturalistic Traffic Data [5.926030548326619]
  We show how the model can be inverted to estimate driver preferences from naturalistic traffic data. One distinct advantage of our approach is the drastically reduced computational burden.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-05T01:20:03Z)
• Contingencies from Observations: Tractable Contingency Planning with Learned Behavior Models [82.34305824719101]
  Humans have a remarkable ability to make decisions by accurately reasoning about future events. We develop a general-purpose contingency planner that is learned end-to-end using high-dimensional scene observations. We show how this model can tractably learn contingencies from behavioral observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T14:30:20Z)
• Building Safer Autonomous Agents by Leveraging Risky Driving Behavior Knowledge [1.52292571922932]
  This study focuses on creating risk prone scenarios with heavy traffic and unexpected random behavior for creating better model-free learning agents. We generate multiple autonomous driving scenarios by creating new custom Markov Decision Process (MDP) environment iterations in highway-env simulation package. We train model free learning agents with supplement information of risk prone driving scenarios and compare their performance with baseline agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T23:39:33Z)
• Deep Structured Reactive Planning [94.92994828905984]
  We propose a novel data-driven, reactive planning objective for self-driving vehicles. We show that our model outperforms a non-reactive variant in successfully completing highly complex maneuvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T01:43:36Z)
• AdvSim: Generating Safety-Critical Scenarios for Self-Driving Vehicles [76.46575807165729]
  We propose AdvSim, an adversarial framework to generate safety-critical scenarios for any LiDAR-based autonomy system. By simulating directly from sensor data, we obtain adversarial scenarios that are safety-critical for the full autonomy stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-16T23:23:12Z)
• MIDAS: Multi-agent Interaction-aware Decision-making with Adaptive Strategies for Urban Autonomous Navigation [22.594295184455]
  This paper builds a reinforcement learning-based method named MIDAS where an ego-agent learns to affect the control actions of other cars. MIDAS is validated using extensive experiments and we show that it (i) can work across different road geometries, (ii) is robust to changes in the driving policies of external agents, and (iv) is more efficient and safer than existing approaches to interaction-aware decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T04:34:25Z)
• Cautious Adaptation For Reinforcement Learning in Safety-Critical Settings [129.80279257258098]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) in real-world safety-critical target settings like urban driving is hazardous. We propose a "safety-critical adaptation" task setting: an agent first trains in non-safety-critical "source" environments. We propose a solution approach, CARL, that builds on the intuition that prior experience in diverse environments equips an agent to estimate risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T01:40:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.