Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI:Attack, Watermarking and Attribution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09272v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 06:40:57 GMT
• Title: Copyright Protection and Accountability of Generative AI:Attack, Watermarking and Attribution
• Authors: Haonan Zhong, Jiamin Chang, Ziyue Yang, Tingmin Wu, Pathum Chamikara Mahawaga Arachchige, Chehara Pathmabandu, Minhui Xue
• Abstract summary: We propose an evaluation framework to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the copyright protection measures for GANs. Our findings indicate that the current intellectual property protection methods for input images, model watermarking, and attribution networks are largely satisfactory for a wide range of GANs.
• Score: 7.0159295162418385
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI (e.g., Generative Adversarial Networks - GANs) has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, Generative AI introduces significant concerns regarding the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) (resp. model accountability) pertaining to images (resp. toxic images) and models (resp. poisoned models) generated. In this paper, we propose an evaluation framework to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of the copyright protection measures for GANs, evaluate their performance across a diverse range of GAN architectures, and identify the factors that affect their performance and future research directions. Our findings indicate that the current IPR protection methods for input images, model watermarking, and attribution networks are largely satisfactory for a wide range of GANs. We highlight that further attention must be directed towards protecting training sets, as the current approaches fail to provide robust IPR protection and provenance tracing on training sets.

Related papers

• CopyrightMeter: Revisiting Copyright Protection in Text-to-image Models [30.618794027527695]
  We develop CopyrightMeter, a unified evaluation framework that incorporates 17 state-of-the-art protections and 16 representative attacks. Our analysis reveals several key findings: (i) most protections (16/17) are not resilient against attacks; (ii) the "best" protection varies depending on the target priority; (iii) more advanced attacks significantly promote the upgrading of protections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T09:19:10Z)
• Purification-Agnostic Proxy Learning for Agentic Copyright Watermarking against Adversarial Evidence Forgery [8.695511322757262]
  Unauthorized use and illegal distribution of AI models pose serious threats to intellectual property. Model watermarking has emerged as a key technique to address this issue. This paper presents several contributions to model watermarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T02:18:45Z)
• Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Models [100.38129820325497]
  Language models (LMs) derive their capabilities from extensive training on diverse data, including potentially copyrighted material. This paper introduces the first evaluation of the feasibility and side effects of copyright takedowns for LMs. We examine several strategies, including adding system prompts, decoding-time filtering interventions, and unlearning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T18:09:46Z)
• MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
  We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models. Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs. Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z)
• Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
  Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code. The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns. This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z)
• Performance-lossless Black-box Model Watermarking [69.22653003059031]
  We propose a branch backdoor-based model watermarking protocol to protect model intellectual property. In addition, we analyze the potential threats to the protocol and provide a secure and feasible watermarking instance for language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T16:14:04Z)
• Exploring Structure Consistency for Deep Model Watermarking [122.38456787761497]
  The intellectual property (IP) of Deep neural networks (DNNs) can be easily stolen'' by surrogate model attack. We propose a new watermarking methodology, namely structure consistency'', based on which a new deep structure-aligned model watermarking algorithm is designed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T04:27:15Z)
• Fingerprinting Image-to-Image Generative Adversarial Networks [53.02510603622128]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been widely used in various application scenarios. This paper presents a novel fingerprinting scheme for the Intellectual Property protection of image-to-image GANs based on a trusted third party.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-19T06:25:10Z)
• Protecting Intellectual Property of Generative Adversarial Networks from Ambiguity Attack [26.937702447957193]
  Generative Adrial Networks (GANs) which has been widely used to create photorealistic image are totally unprotected. This paper presents a complete protection framework in both black-box and white-box settings to enforce Intellectual Property Right (IPR) protection on GANs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T17:12:20Z)
• A Systematic Review on Model Watermarking for Neural Networks [1.2691047660244335]
  This work presents a taxonomy identifying and analyzing different classes of watermarking schemes for machine learning models. It introduces a unified threat model to allow structured reasoning on and comparison of the effectiveness of watermarking methods. It systematizes desired security requirements and attacks against ML model watermarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T12:03:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.