Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11504v2
• Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:33:23 GMT
• Title: Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey
• Authors: Tyler A. Chang and Benjamin K. Bergen
• Abstract summary: We discuss over 250 recent studies of English language model behavior before task-specific fine-tuning. Despite dramatic increases in generated text quality as models scale to hundreds of billions of parameters, the models are still prone to unfactual responses, commonsense errors, memorized text, and social biases.
• Score: 5.663056267168211
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Transformer language models have received widespread public attention, yet their generated text is often surprising even to NLP researchers. In this survey, we discuss over 250 recent studies of English language model behavior before task-specific fine-tuning. Language models possess basic capabilities in syntax, semantics, pragmatics, world knowledge, and reasoning, but these capabilities are sensitive to specific inputs and surface features. Despite dramatic increases in generated text quality as models scale to hundreds of billions of parameters, the models are still prone to unfactual responses, commonsense errors, memorized text, and social biases. Many of these weaknesses can be framed as over-generalizations or under-generalizations of learned patterns in text. We synthesize recent results to highlight what is currently known about large language model capabilities, thus providing a resource for applied work and for research in adjacent fields that use language models.

Related papers

• Investigating Language-Specific Calibration For Pruning Multilingual Large Language Models [11.421452042888523]
  We compare different calibration languages for pruning multilingual models across diverse languages, tasks, models, and SotA pruning techniques. Our results offer practical suggestions, for example, calibrating in the target language can efficiently retain the language modeling capability but does not necessarily benefit downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T16:29:13Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Tasks [92.64781370921486]
  We present an extensive analysis of various benchmarks including a sentence planning benchmark with different granularities. After comparing large language models against state-of-the-start finetuned smaller models, we present a spectrum showing large language models falling behind, are comparable, or exceed the ability of smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:48:24Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• On the application of Large Language Models for language teaching and assessment technology [18.735612275207853]
  We look at the potential for incorporating large language models in AI-driven language teaching and assessment systems. We find that larger language models offer improvements over previous models in text generation. For automated grading and grammatical error correction, tasks whose progress is checked on well-known benchmarks, early investigations indicate that large language models on their own do not improve on state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T11:12:56Z)
• Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizations [0.0]
  We train neural models for a range of natural language processing tasks on a massively multilingual dataset of Bible translations in 1295 languages. The learned language representations are then compared to existing typological databases as well as to a novel set of quantitative syntactic and morphological features. We conclude that some generalizations are surprisingly close to traditional features from linguistic typology, but that most models, as well as those of previous work, do not appear to have made linguistically meaningful generalizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T15:09:59Z)
• Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models [648.3665819567409]
  Language models demonstrate both quantitative improvement and new qualitative capabilities with increasing scale. Big-bench consists of 204 tasks, contributed by 450 authors across 132 institutions. We evaluate the behavior of OpenAI's GPT models, Google-internal dense transformer architectures, and Switch-style sparse transformers on BIG-bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:05:34Z)
• Estimating the Personality of White-Box Language Models [0.589889361990138]
  Large-scale language models, which are trained on large corpora of text, are being used in a wide range of applications everywhere. Existing research shows that these models can and do capture human biases. Many of these biases, especially those that could potentially cause harm, are being well-investigated. However, studies that infer and change human personality traits inherited by these models have been scarce or non-existent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T23:53:53Z)
• Analyzing the Limits of Self-Supervision in Handling Bias in Language [52.26068057260399]
  We evaluate how well language models capture the semantics of four tasks for bias: diagnosis, identification, extraction and rephrasing. Our analyses indicate that language models are capable of performing these tasks to widely varying degrees across different bias dimensions, such as gender and political affiliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T05:36:08Z)
• Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling [90.80124496312274]
  We construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages. We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages. We harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T23:49:18Z)
• Limits of Detecting Text Generated by Large-Scale Language Models [65.46403462928319]
  Some consider large-scale language models that can generate long and coherent pieces of text as dangerous, since they may be used in misinformation campaigns. Here we formulate large-scale language model output detection as a hypothesis testing problem to classify text as genuine or generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T19:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.