Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:35:01 GMT
• Title: Artificial muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Have Risen to Human-Level Creativity
• Authors: Jennifer Haase and Paul H. P. Hanel
• Abstract summary: We compare human-generated ideas with those generated by six Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) We found no qualitative difference between AI and human-generated creativity, although there are differences in how ideas are generated. Our findings suggest that GAIs are valuable assistants in the creative process.
• Score: 1.332560004325655
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A widespread view is that Artificial Intelligence cannot be creative. We tested this assumption by comparing human-generated ideas with those generated by six Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) chatbots: alpa.ai, Copy.ai, ChatGPT (versions 3 and 4), Studio.ai, and YouChat. Humans and a specifically trained AI independently assessed the quality and quantity of ideas. We found no qualitative difference between AI and human-generated creativity, although there are differences in how ideas are generated. Interestingly, 9.4 percent of humans were more creative than the most creative GAI, GPT-4. Our findings suggest that GAIs are valuable assistants in the creative process. Continued research and development of GAI in creative tasks is crucial to fully understand this technology's potential benefits and drawbacks in shaping the future of creativity. Finally, we discuss the question of whether GAIs are capable of being truly creative.

Related papers

• Can AI Enhance its Creativity to Beat Humans ? [0.0]
  This study investigates the creative performance of artificial intelligence (AI) compared to humans. Human external evaluators have scored creative outputs generated by humans and AI. Results suggest that integrating human feedback is crucial for maximizing AI's creative potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T14:19:07Z)
• Can AI Outperform Human Experts in Creating Social Media Creatives? [0.6963971634605797]
  This paper evaluates AI's capability in the creative domain compared to human experts. We propose a novel Prompt-for-Prompt to generate social media creatives via prompt augmentation by Large Language Models. We find that AI excels human experts, and Midjourney is better than the other text-to-image generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T07:41:45Z)
• On the stochastics of human and artificial creativity [0.0]
  We argue that achieving human-level intelligence in computers requires also human-level creativity. We develop a statistical representation of human creativity, incorporating prior insights from theory, psychology, philosophy, neuroscience, and chaos theory. Our analysis includes modern AI algorithms such as reinforcement learning, diffusion models, and large language models, addressing to what extent they measure up to human level creativity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T10:38:57Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
  Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species. Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z)
• A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need? [112.12974778019304]
  generative AI (AIGC, a.k.a AI-generated content) has made headlines everywhere because of its ability to analyze and create text, images, and beyond. In the era of AI transitioning from pure analysis to creation, it is worth noting that ChatGPT, with its most recent language model GPT-4, is just a tool out of numerous AIGC tasks. This work focuses on the technological development of various AIGC tasks based on their output type, including text, images, videos, 3D content, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T10:09:47Z)
• Telling Creative Stories Using Generative Visual Aids [52.623545341588304]
  We asked writers to write creative stories from a starting prompt, and provided them with visuals created by generative AI models from the same prompt. Compared to a control group, writers who used the visuals as story writing aid wrote significantly more creative, original, complete and visualizable stories. Findings indicate that cross modality inputs by AI can benefit divergent aspects of creativity in human-AI co-creation, but hinders convergent thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T23:13:47Z)
• The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback [58.17897225617566]
  The MineRL BASALT competition aims to spur forward research on this important class of techniques. We design a suite of four tasks in Minecraft for which we expect it will be hard to write down hardcoded reward functions. We provide a dataset of human demonstrations on each of the four tasks, as well as an imitation learning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:18:17Z)
• Creativity in the era of artificial intelligence [1.8275108630751844]
  We aim to provide a new perspective on the question of creativity at the era of AI, by blurring the frontier between social and computational sciences. We argue that the objective of trying to purely mimic human creative traits towards a self-contained ex-nihilo generative machine would be highly counterproductive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-13T15:07:34Z)
• Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
  We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains. Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.