Informed Machine Learning, Centrality, CNN, Relevant Document Detection,
Repatriation of Indigenous Human Remains
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14475v1
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:21 GMT
- Title: Informed Machine Learning, Centrality, CNN, Relevant Document Detection,
Repatriation of Indigenous Human Remains
- Authors: Md Abul Bashar, Richi Nayak, Gareth Knapman, Paul Turnbull, Cressida
Fforde
- Abstract summary: This article reports on collaborative research by data scientists and social science researchers in the Research, Reconcile, Renew Network (RRR) to develop and apply text mining techniques.
We describe our work to date on developing a machine learning-based solution to automate the process of finding and semantically analysing relevant texts.
To improve the accuracy of our detection model, we explore the use of an Informed Neural Network (INN) model that describes documentary content using expert-informed contextual knowledge.
- Score: 1.3299507495084417
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Among the pressing issues facing Australian and other First Nations peoples
is the repatriation of the bodily remains of their ancestors, which are
currently held in Western scientific institutions. The success of securing the
return of these remains to their communities for reburial depends largely on
locating information within scientific and other literature published between
1790 and 1970 documenting their theft, donation, sale, or exchange between
institutions. This article reports on collaborative research by data scientists
and social science researchers in the Research, Reconcile, Renew Network (RRR)
to develop and apply text mining techniques to identify this vital information.
We describe our work to date on developing a machine learning-based solution to
automate the process of finding and semantically analysing relevant texts.
Classification models, particularly deep learning-based models, are known to
have low accuracy when trained with small amounts of labelled (i.e.
relevant/non-relevant) documents. To improve the accuracy of our detection
model, we explore the use of an Informed Neural Network (INN) model that
describes documentary content using expert-informed contextual knowledge. Only
a few labelled documents are used to provide specificity to the model, using
conceptually related keywords identified by RRR experts in provenance research.
The results confirm the value of using an INN network model for identifying
relevant documents related to the investigation of the global commercial trade
in Indigenous human remains. Empirical analysis suggests that this INN model
can be generalized for use by other researchers in the social sciences and
humanities who want to extract relevant information from large textual corpora.
Related papers
- SciArena: An Open Evaluation Platform for Foundation Models in Scientific Literature Tasks [87.29946641069068]
We present SciArena, an open and collaborative platform for evaluating foundation models on scientific literature tasks.<n>By leveraging collective intelligence, SciArena offers a community-driven evaluation of model performance on open-ended scientific tasks.<n>We release SciArena-Eval, a meta-evaluation benchmark based on our collected preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-01T17:51:59Z) - From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents [96.65646344634524]
Large Language Models (LLMs), endowed with reasoning and agentic capabilities, are ushering in a new paradigm termed Agentic Deep Research.<n>We trace the evolution from static web search to interactive, agent-based systems that plan, explore, and learn.<n>We demonstrate that Agentic Deep Research not only significantly outperforms existing approaches, but is also poised to become the dominant paradigm for future information seeking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T17:27:19Z) - From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval [21.56093567336119]
generative information retrieval (GenIR) has emerged as a novel paradigm, gaining increasing attention in recent years.
This paper aims to systematically review the latest research progress in GenIR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T09:05:37Z) - ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
ResearchAgent is a large language model-powered research idea writing agent.
It generates problems, methods, and experiment designs while iteratively refining them based on scientific literature.
We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z) - SciNews: From Scholarly Complexities to Public Narratives -- A Dataset for Scientific News Report Generation [20.994565065595232]
We present a new corpus to facilitate the automated generation of scientific news reports.
Our dataset comprises academic publications and their corresponding scientific news reports across nine disciplines.
We benchmark our dataset employing state-of-the-art text generation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T14:54:48Z) - Towards Data-and Knowledge-Driven Artificial Intelligence: A Survey on Neuro-Symbolic Computing [73.0977635031713]
Neural-symbolic computing (NeSy) has been an active research area of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for many years.
NeSy shows promise of reconciling the advantages of reasoning and interpretability of symbolic representation and robust learning in neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-28T04:38:10Z) - Modeling Information Change in Science Communication with Semantically
Matched Paraphrases [50.67030449927206]
SPICED is the first paraphrase dataset of scientific findings annotated for degree of information change.
SPICED contains 6,000 scientific finding pairs extracted from news stories, social media discussions, and full texts of original papers.
Models trained on SPICED improve downstream performance on evidence retrieval for fact checking of real-world scientific claims.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T07:44:38Z) - EBOCA: Evidences for BiOmedical Concepts Association Ontology [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes EBOCA, an ontology that describes (i) biomedical domain concepts and associations between them, and (ii) evidences supporting these associations.
Test data coming from a subset of DISNET and automatic association extractions from texts has been transformed to create a Knowledge Graph that can be used in real scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-01T18:47:03Z) - Probing Across Time: What Does RoBERTa Know and When? [70.20775905353794]
We show that linguistic knowledge is acquired fast, stably, and robustly across domains. Facts and commonsense are slower and more domain-sensitive.
We believe that probing-across-time analyses can help researchers understand the complex, intermingled learning that these models undergo and guide us toward more efficient approaches that accomplish necessary learning faster.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-16T04:26:39Z) - Semantic and Relational Spaces in Science of Science: Deep Learning
Models for Article Vectorisation [4.178929174617172]
We focus on document-level embeddings based on the semantic and relational aspects of articles, using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)
Our results show that using NLP we can encode a semantic space of articles, while with GNN we are able to build a relational space where the social practices of a research community are also encoded.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-05T14:57:41Z) - Generating Knowledge Graphs by Employing Natural Language Processing and
Machine Learning Techniques within the Scholarly Domain [1.9004296236396943]
We present a new architecture that takes advantage of Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning methods for extracting entities and relationships from research publications.
Within this research work, we i) tackle the challenge of knowledge extraction by employing several state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing and Text Mining tools.
We generated a scientific knowledge graph including 109,105 triples, extracted from 26,827 abstracts of papers within the Semantic Web domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-28T08:31:40Z) - Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documents [55.23390424044378]
We address the task of explaining relationships between two scientific documents using natural language text.
In this paper we establish a dataset of 622K examples from 154K documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-02T03:54:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.