An Embedding-based Approach to Inconsistency-tolerant Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01664v2
• Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 08:11:57 GMT
• Title: An Embedding-based Approach to Inconsistency-tolerant Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies
• Authors: Keyu Wang, Site Li, Jiaye Li, Guilin Qi and Qiu Ji
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach to reasoning with inconsistent semantics based on the embeddings of axioms. We show that our embedding-based method can outperform existing inconsistency-tolerant reasoning methods based on maximal consistent subsets.
• Score: 12.760301272393898
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Inconsistency handling is an important issue in knowledge management. Especially in ontology engineering, logical inconsistencies may occur during ontology construction. A natural way to reason with an inconsistent ontology is to utilize the maximal consistent subsets of the ontology. However, previous studies on selecting maximum consistent subsets have rarely considered the semantics of the axioms, which may result in irrational inference. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to reasoning with inconsistent ontologies in description logics based on the embeddings of axioms. We first give a method for turning axioms into distributed semantic vectors to compute the semantic connections between the axioms. We then define an embedding-based method for selecting the maximum consistent subsets and use it to define an inconsistency-tolerant inference relation. We show the rationality of our inference relation by considering some logical properties. Finally, we conduct experiments on several ontologies to evaluate the reasoning power of our inference relation. The experimental results show that our embedding-based method can outperform existing inconsistency-tolerant reasoning methods based on maximal consistent subsets.

Related papers

• Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement [92.61557711360652]
  Language models (LMs) often fall short on inductive reasoning, despite achieving impressive success on research benchmarks. We conduct a systematic study of the inductive reasoning capabilities of LMs through iterative hypothesis refinement. We reveal several discrepancies between the inductive reasoning processes of LMs and humans, shedding light on both the potentials and limitations of using LMs in inductive reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:51:10Z)
• A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version) [72.77805489645604]
  We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability. Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity. We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z)
• Strengthening Consistency Results in Modal Logic [0.0]
  A fundamental question in modal logic is whether a given theory is consistent, but consistent with what? A typical way to address this question identifies a choice of background knowledge axioms (say, S4, D, etc.) and then shows the assumptions codified by the theory in question to be consistent with those background axioms. This paper introduces generic theories for propositional modal logic to address consistency results in a more robust way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:05:37Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• Learnability with PAC Semantics for Multi-agent Beliefs [38.88111785113001]
  The tension between deduction and induction is perhaps the most fundamental issue in areas such as philosophy, cognition and artificial intelligence. Valiant recognised that the challenge of learning should be integrated with deduction. Although weaker than classical entailment, it allows for a powerful model-theoretic framework for answering queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T18:22:46Z)
• Abductive Commonsense Reasoning Exploiting Mutually Exclusive Explanations [118.0818807474809]
  Abductive reasoning aims to find plausible explanations for an event. Existing approaches for abductive reasoning in natural language processing often rely on manually generated annotations for supervision. This work proposes an approach for abductive commonsense reasoning that exploits the fact that only a subset of explanations is correct for a given context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T01:35:10Z)
• Dual Box Embeddings for the Description Logic EL++ [16.70961576041243]
  Similar to Knowledge Graphs (KGs), Knowledge Graphs are often incomplete, and maintaining and constructing them has proved challenging. Similar to KGs, a promising approach is to learn embeddings in a latent vector space, while additionally ensuring they adhere to the semantics of the underlying DL. We propose a novel ontology embedding method named Box$2$EL for the DL EL++, which represents both concepts and roles as boxes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T14:13:37Z)
• A Description Logic for Analogical Reasoning [28.259681405091666]
  We present a mechanism to infer plausible missing knowledge, which relies on reasoning by analogy. This is the first paper that studies analog reasoning within the setting of description logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T19:06:07Z)
• Sequent-Type Calculi for Systems of Nonmonotonic Paraconsistent Logics [2.627046865670577]
  We introduce uniform axiomatisations for a family of nonmonotonic paraconsistent logics based on minimal inconsistency in terms of sequent-type proof systems. We provide sequent-type calculi for Priest's three-valued minimally inconsistent logic of paradox, and for four-valued paraconsistent inference relations due to Arieli and Avron.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T00:49:52Z)
• Logical Neural Networks [51.46602187496816]
  We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning) Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omni rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T16:55:45Z)
• Invariant Rationalization [84.1861516092232]
  A typical rationalization criterion, i.e. maximum mutual information (MMI), finds the rationale that maximizes the prediction performance based only on the rationale. We introduce a game-theoretic invariant rationalization criterion where the rationales are constrained to enable the same predictor to be optimal across different environments. We show both theoretically and empirically that the proposed rationales can rule out spurious correlations, generalize better to different test scenarios, and align better with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-22T00:50:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.