Examining Temporalities on Stance Detection towards COVID-19 Vaccination

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04806v3
• Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 16:46:06 GMT
• Title: Examining Temporalities on Stance Detection towards COVID-19 Vaccination
• Authors: Yida Mu, Mali Jin, Kalina Bontcheva, Xingyi Song,
• Abstract summary: attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, such as pro-vaccine or vaccine hesitancy, have evolved over time on social media. This study aims to examine the impact of temporal concept drift on stance detection towards COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter.
• Score: 3.2719621666321412
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Previous studies have highlighted the importance of vaccination as an effective strategy to control the transmission of the COVID-19 virus. It is crucial for policymakers to have a comprehensive understanding of the public's stance towards vaccination on a large scale. However, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, such as pro-vaccine or vaccine hesitancy, have evolved over time on social media. Thus, it is necessary to account for possible temporal shifts when analysing these stances. This study aims to examine the impact of temporal concept drift on stance detection towards COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter. To this end, we evaluate a range of transformer-based models using chronological (splitting the training, validation, and test sets in order of time) and random splits (randomly splitting these three sets) of social media data. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies in model performance between random and chronological splits in several existing COVID-19-related datasets; specifically, chronological splits significantly reduce the accuracy of stance classification. Therefore, real-world stance detection approaches need to be further refined to incorporate temporal factors as a key consideration.

Related papers

• Deep State-Space Generative Model For Correlated Time-to-Event Predictions [54.3637600983898]
  We propose a deep latent state-space generative model to capture the interactions among different types of correlated clinical events. Our method also uncovers meaningful insights about the latent correlations among mortality and different types of organ failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T02:42:36Z)
• Small Area Estimation of Case Growths for Timely COVID-19 Outbreak Detection [4.478818286947472]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has exerted a profound impact on the global economy and continues to exact a significant toll on human lives. The COVID-19 case growth rate stands as a key epidemiological parameter to estimate and monitor for effective detection and containment of the resurgence of outbreaks. A fundamental challenge in growth rate estimation and hence outbreak detection is balancing the accuracy-speed tradeoff. We develop a machine learning algorithm, which we call Transfer Learning Generalized Random Forest (TLGRF), that balances this accuracy-speed tradeoff.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T07:53:00Z)
• VaxxHesitancy: A Dataset for Studying Hesitancy towards COVID-19 Vaccination on Twitter [6.061534265076204]
  We create a new collection of over 3,101 tweets annotated with users' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination (stance) To the best of our knowledge, these are the first dataset and model that model vaccine hesitancy as a category distinct from pro- and anti-vaccine stance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T02:00:31Z)
• Dense Feature Memory Augmented Transformers for COVID-19 Vaccination Search Classification [60.49594822215981]
  This paper presents a classification model for detecting COVID-19 vaccination related search queries. We propose a novel approach of considering dense features as memory tokens that the model can attend to. We show that this new modeling approach enables a significant improvement to the Vaccine Search Insights (VSI) task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T13:57:41Z)
• Deep Learning Reveals Patterns of Diverse and Changing Sentiments Towards COVID-19 Vaccines Based on 11 Million Tweets [3.319350419970857]
  11,211,672 COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets corresponding to 2,203,681 users over two years were analyzed. We finetuned a deep learning classifier using a state-of-the-art model, XLNet, to detect each tweet's sentiment automatically. Users from various demographic groups demonstrated distinct patterns in sentiments towards COVID-19 vaccines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T13:53:16Z)
• Modeling the effect of the vaccination campaign on the Covid-19 pandemic [0.0]
  We introduce SAIVR, a mathematical model able to forecast the Covid-19 epidemic evolution during the vaccination campaign. The model contains several parameters and initial conditions that are estimated by employing a semi-supervised machine learning procedure. Instructed by these results, we performed an extensive study on the temporal evolution of the pandemic under varying values of roll-out daily rates, vaccine efficacy, and a broad range of societal vaccine hesitancy/denial levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-27T19:12:13Z)
• A k-mer Based Approach for SARS-CoV-2 Variant Identification [55.78588835407174]
  We show that preserving the order of the amino acids helps the underlying classifiers to achieve better performance. We also show the importance of the different amino acids which play a key role in identifying variants and how they coincide with those reported by the USA's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-07T15:08:15Z)
• STELAR: Spatio-temporal Tensor Factorization with Latent Epidemiological Regularization [76.57716281104938]
  We develop a tensor method to predict the evolution of epidemic trends for many regions simultaneously. STELAR enables long-term prediction by incorporating latent temporal regularization through a system of discrete-time difference equations. We conduct experiments using both county- and state-level COVID-19 data and show that our model can identify interesting latent patterns of the epidemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T21:21:47Z)
• Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
  The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world. We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research. Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z)
• Effectiveness and Compliance to Social Distancing During COVID-19 [72.94965109944707]
  We use a detailed set of mobility data to evaluate the impact that stay-at-home orders had on the spread of COVID-19 in the US. We show that there is a unidirectional Granger causality, from the median percentage of time spent daily at home to the daily number of COVID-19-related deaths with a lag of 2 weeks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T03:36:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.