Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10750v2
• Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:25:33 GMT
• Title: Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback
• Authors: Nikhil Mehta, Milagro Teruel, Patricio Figueroa Sanz, Xin Deng, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, and Julia Kiseleva
• Abstract summary: We argue that human-AI collaboration should be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world.
• Score: 42.19685958922537
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many approaches to Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks often treat them as single-step problems, where an agent receives an instruction, executes it, and is evaluated based on the final outcome. However, human language is inherently interactive, as evidenced by the back-and-forth nature of human conversations. In light of this, we posit that human-AI collaboration should also be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. Further, the AI agent should be able to detect when it needs additional information and proactively ask for help. Enabling this scenario would lead to more natural, efficient, and engaging human-AI collaborations. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world. We explore multiple types of help players can give to the AI to guide it and analyze the impact of this help in AI behavior, resulting in performance improvements.

Related papers

• Let people fail! Exploring the influence of explainable virtual and robotic agents in learning-by-doing tasks [45.23431596135002]
  This study compares the effects of classic vs. partner-aware explanations on human behavior and performance during a learning-by-doing task. Results indicated that partner-aware explanations influenced participants differently based on the type of artificial agents involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:22:04Z)
• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• Unexploited Information Value in Human-AI Collaboration [23.353778024330165]
  How to improve performance of a human-AI team is often not clear without knowing what particular information and strategies each agent employs. We propose a model based in statistically decision theory to analyze human-AI collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T01:34:45Z)
• Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task [56.92961847155029]
  Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises when AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T13:19:48Z)
• On the Effect of Contextual Information on Human Delegation Behavior in Human-AI collaboration [3.9253315480927964]
  We study the effects of providing contextual information on human decisions to delegate instances to an AI. We find that providing participants with contextual information significantly improves the human-AI team performance. This research advances the understanding of human-AI interaction in human delegation and provides actionable insights for designing more effective collaborative systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T18:59:47Z)
• Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review [6.013543974938446]
  Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements. A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T17:46:38Z)
• CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society [58.04479313658851]
  This paper explores the potential of building scalable techniques to facilitate autonomous cooperation among communicative agents. We propose a novel communicative agent framework named role-playing. Our contributions include introducing a novel communicative agent framework, offering a scalable approach for studying the cooperative behaviors and capabilities of multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T01:09:00Z)
• Imitating Interactive Intelligence [24.95842455898523]
  We study how to design artificial agents that can interact naturally with humans using the simplification of a virtual environment. To build agents that can robustly interact with humans, we would ideally train them while they interact with humans. We use ideas from inverse reinforcement learning to reduce the disparities between human-human and agent-agent interactive behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T13:55:47Z)
• Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaboration [116.28433607265573]
  We introduce Watch-And-Help (WAH), a challenge for testing social intelligence in AI agents. In WAH, an AI agent needs to help a human-like agent perform a complex household task efficiently. We build VirtualHome-Social, a multi-agent household environment, and provide a benchmark including both planning and learning based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:48:31Z)
• SPA: Verbal Interactions between Agents and Avatars in Shared Virtual Environments using Propositional Planning [61.335252950832256]
  Sense-Plan-Ask, or SPA, generates plausible verbal interactions between virtual human-like agents and user avatars in shared virtual environments. We find that our algorithm creates a small runtime cost and enables agents to complete their goals more effectively than agents without the ability to leverage natural-language communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-08T23:15:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.