Reddit in the Time of COVID

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10777v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 07:06:38 GMT
• Title: Reddit in the Time of COVID
• Authors: Veniamin Veselovsky and Ashton Anderson
• Abstract summary: We study platform evolution through two key dimensions: structure vs. content and macro- vs. micro-level analysis. We show that typically when rapid growth occurs, it is driven by a few concentrated communities and within a narrow slice of language use. Second, all groups were equally affected in their change of interest, but veteran users tended to invoke COVID-related language more than newer users. Third, the new wave of users that arrived following COVID-19 was fundamentally different from previous cohorts of new users in terms of interests, activity, and likelihood of staying active on the platform.
• Score: 2.66512000865131
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, much of life moved online. Platforms of all types reported surges of activity, and people remarked on the various important functions that online platforms suddenly fulfilled. However, researchers lack a rigorous understanding of the pandemic's impacts on social platforms, and whether they were temporary or long-lasting. We present a conceptual framework for studying the large-scale evolution of social platforms and apply it to the study of Reddit's history, with a particular focus on the COVID-19 pandemic. We study platform evolution through two key dimensions: structure vs. content and macro- vs. micro-level analysis. Structural signals help us quantify how much behavior changed, while content analysis clarifies exactly how it changed. Applying these at the macro-level illuminates platform-wide changes, while at the micro-level we study impacts on individual users. We illustrate the value of this approach by showing the extraordinary and ordinary changes Reddit went through during the pandemic. First, we show that typically when rapid growth occurs, it is driven by a few concentrated communities and within a narrow slice of language use. However, Reddit's growth throughout COVID-19 was spread across disparate communities and languages. Second, all groups were equally affected in their change of interest, but veteran users tended to invoke COVID-related language more than newer users. Third, the new wave of users that arrived following COVID-19 was fundamentally different from previous cohorts of new users in terms of interests, activity, and likelihood of staying active on the platform. These findings provide a more rigorous understanding of how an online platform changed during the global pandemic.

Related papers

• Structure and dynamics of growing networks of Reddit threads [0.0]
  We study a Reddit community in which people participate to judge or be judged with respect to some behavior. We model threads of this community as complex networks of user interactions growing in time. We show that the evolution of Reddit networks differ from other real social networks, despite falling in the same category.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T07:53:33Z)
• The Evolution of Language in Social Media Comments [37.69303106863453]
  This study investigates the linguistic characteristics of user comments over 34 years, focusing on their complexity and temporal shifts. We utilize a dataset of approximately 300 million English comments from eight diverse platforms and topics. Our findings reveal consistent patterns of complexity across social media platforms and topics, characterized by a nearly universal reduction in text length, diminished lexical richness, but decreased repetitiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T12:03:30Z)
• Mental Disorders on Online Social Media Through the Lens of Language and Behaviour: Analysis and Visualisation [7.133136338850781]
  We study the factors that characterise and differentiate social media users affected by mental disorders. Our findings reveal significant differences on the use of function words, such as adverbs and verb tense, and topic-specific vocabulary. We find evidence suggesting that language use on micro-blogging platforms is less distinguishable for users who have a mental disorder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T15:29:01Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• Two-Faced Humans on Twitter and Facebook: Harvesting Social Multimedia for Human Personality Profiling [74.83957286553924]
  We infer the Myers-Briggs Personality Type indicators by applying a novel multi-view fusion framework, called "PERS" Our experimental results demonstrate the PERS's ability to learn from multi-view data for personality profiling by efficiently leveraging on the significantly different data arriving from diverse social multimedia sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-20T10:48:49Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Debate on Online Social Networks at the Time of COVID-19: An Italian Case Study [4.176752121302988]
  We analyze how the interaction patterns around popular influencers in Italy changed during the first six months of 2020. We collected a large dataset for this group of public figures, including more than 54 million comments on over 140 thousand posts. We also analyze the user sentiment through the psycholinguistic properties of comments, and the results testified the rapid boom and disappearance of topics related to the pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T08:25:19Z)
• The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook [5.135597127873748]
  We analyze the prevalence and diffusion of links to low-credibility content on Twitter and Facebook. A minority of accounts and pages exert a strong influence on each platform. The overt nature of this manipulation points to the need for societal-level solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T02:00:43Z)
• Face Off: Polarized Public Opinions on Personal Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic [77.34726150561087]
  A series of policy shifts by various governmental bodies have been speculated to have contributed to the polarization of face masks. We propose a novel approach to accurately gauge public sentiment towards face masks in the United States during COVID-19. We find two key policy-shift events contributed to statistically significant changes in sentiment for both Republicans and Democrats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T18:52:41Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.