MAWSEO: Adversarial Wiki Search Poisoning for Illicit Online Promotion
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11300v3
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 19:35:25 GMT
- Title: MAWSEO: Adversarial Wiki Search Poisoning for Illicit Online Promotion
- Abstract summary: In this paper, we report a study that, for the first time, shows that such stealthy blackhat SEO on Wiki can be automated.
Our technique, called MAWSEO, employs adversarial revisions to achieve real-world cybercriminal objectives.
Our evaluation and user study demonstrate that MAWSEO is capable of effectively and efficiently generating adversarial vandalism edits.
- Score: 23.200022139747254
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As a prominent instance of vandalism edits, Wiki search poisoning for illicit promotion is a cybercrime in which the adversary aims at editing Wiki articles to promote illicit businesses through Wiki search results of relevant queries. In this paper, we report a study that, for the first time, shows that such stealthy blackhat SEO on Wiki can be automated. Our technique, called MAWSEO, employs adversarial revisions to achieve real-world cybercriminal objectives, including rank boosting, vandalism detection evasion, topic relevancy, semantic consistency, user awareness (but not alarming) of promotional content, etc. Our evaluation and user study demonstrate that MAWSEO is capable of effectively and efficiently generating adversarial vandalism edits, which can bypass state-of-the-art built-in Wiki vandalism detectors, and also get promotional content through to Wiki users without triggering their alarms. In addition, we investigated potential defense, including coherence based detection and adversarial training of vandalism detection, against our attack in the Wiki ecosystem.
Related papers
- RedEdit: Agentic Red-Teaming of Image Safety Classifiers via MCTS-Guided Photo-Editing [27.502738091136763]
RedEdit is a novel black-box red-teaming agent that formulates photo-editing evasion as a search problem over edit-tool sequences.<n>It generates semantically targeted candidate edits and a Monte Carlo Tree Search planner to prioritize promising edit paths while backtracking from ineffective ones.<n>Our experiments on UnsafeBench reveal profound systemic vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-04T13:19:53Z) - Making MLLMs Blind: Adversarial Smuggling Attacks in MLLM Content Moderation [54.38271718421492]
Adversarial smuggling attacks exploit the Human-AI capability gap.<n>It encodes harmful content into human-readable visual formats that remain AI-unreadable.<n>We conduct a preliminary exploration of mitigation strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T11:13:16Z) - AttackMate: Realistic Emulation and Automation of Cyber Attack Scenarios Across the Kill Chain [2.882241577423132]
Adversary emulation tools facilitate scripting and automated execution of cyber attack chains.<n>This paper introduces AttackMate, an open-source attack scripting language and execution engine designed to mimic behavior patterns of actual attackers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T16:04:59Z) - Attacks by Content: Automated Fact-checking is an AI Security Issue [1.5770741892463622]
Previous research has studied indirect prompt injection, where the attacker injects malicious instructions.<n>We argue that injection of instructions is not necessary to manipulate agents - attackers could instead supply biased, misleading, or false information.<n>Existing defenses, which focus on detecting hidden commands, are ineffective against attacks by content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T10:18:48Z) - DIA: The Adversarial Exposure of Deterministic Inversion in Diffusion Models [27.30533926104877]
We present the DDIM Inversion Attack (DIA) that attacks the integrated DDIM trajectory path.<n>Our results support the effective disruption, surpassing previous defensive methods across various editing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T11:20:03Z) - Cuckoo Attack: Stealthy and Persistent Attacks Against AI-IDE [64.47951172662745]
Cuckoo Attack is a novel attack that achieves stealthy and persistent command execution by embedding malicious payloads into configuration files.<n>We formalize our attack paradigm into two stages, including initial infection and persistence.<n>We contribute seven actionable checkpoints for vendors to evaluate their product security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-19T04:10:52Z) - Erased but Not Forgotten: How Backdoors Compromise Concept Erasure [36.056298969999645]
We introduce a new threat model, Toxic Erasure (ToxE), and demonstrate how recent unlearning algorithms can be circumvented through targeted backdoor attacks.
For explicit content erasure, ToxE attacks can elicit up to 9 times more exposed body parts, with DISA yielding an average increase by a factor of 2.9.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T16:13:06Z) - MELON: Indirect Prompt Injection Defense via Masked Re-execution and Tool Comparison [60.30753230776882]
LLM agents are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI) attacks.
We present MELON, a novel IPI defense.
We show that MELON outperforms SOTA defenses in both attack prevention and utility preservation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:57:49Z) - Illusions of Relevance: Using Content Injection Attacks to Deceive Retrievers, Rerankers, and LLM Judges [52.96987928118327]
We find that embedding models for retrieval, rerankers, and large language model (LLM) relevance judges are vulnerable to content injection attacks.
We identify two primary threats: (1) inserting unrelated or harmful content within passages that still appear deceptively "relevant", and (2) inserting entire queries or key query terms into passages to boost their perceived relevance.
Our study systematically examines the factors that influence an attack's success, such as the placement of injected content and the balance between relevant and non-relevant material.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T18:02:15Z) - Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents [70.2077308846307]
We manually create 200 targeted adversarial tasks and evaluation scripts in a realistic threat model on top of VisualWebArena.
We find that we can successfully break latest agents that use black-box frontier LMs, including those that perform reflection and tree search.
We also use ARE to rigorously evaluate how the robustness changes as new components are added.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T17:32:48Z) - Evaluating and Mitigating IP Infringement in Visual Generative AI [54.24196167576133]
State-of-the-art visual generative models can generate content that bears a striking resemblance to characters protected by intellectual property rights.
This happens when the input prompt contains the character's name or even just descriptive details about their characteristics.
We develop a revised generation paradigm that can identify potentially infringing generated content and prevent IP infringement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T06:14:18Z) - Mitigating Label Flipping Attacks in Malicious URL Detectors Using
Ensemble Trees [16.16333915007336]
Malicious URLs provide adversarial opportunities across various industries, including transportation, healthcare, energy, and banking.
backdoor attacks involve manipulating a small percentage of training data labels, such as Label Flipping (LF), which changes benign labels to malicious ones and vice versa.
We propose an innovative alarm system that detects the presence of poisoned labels and a defense mechanism designed to uncover the original class labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T14:21:57Z) - Preserving Semantics in Textual Adversarial Attacks [0.0]
Up to 70% of adversarial examples generated by adversarial attacks should be discarded because they do not preserve semantics.
We propose a new, fully supervised sentence embedding technique called Semantics-Preserving-Encoder (SPE)
Our method outperforms existing sentence encoders used in adversarial attacks by achieving 1.2x - 5.1x better real attack success rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-08T12:40:07Z) - A Tale of HodgeRank and Spectral Method: Target Attack Against Rank
Aggregation Is the Fixed Point of Adversarial Game [153.74942025516853]
The intrinsic vulnerability of the rank aggregation methods is not well studied in the literature.
In this paper, we focus on the purposeful adversary who desires to designate the aggregated results by modifying the pairwise data.
The effectiveness of the suggested target attack strategies is demonstrated by a series of toy simulations and several real-world data experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-13T05:59:02Z) - Fact-Saboteurs: A Taxonomy of Evidence Manipulation Attacks against
Fact-Verification Systems [80.3811072650087]
We show that it is possible to subtly modify claim-salient snippets in the evidence and generate diverse and claim-aligned evidence.
The attacks are also robust against post-hoc modifications of the claim.
These attacks can have harmful implications on the inspectable and human-in-the-loop usage scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T13:39:24Z) - Attention-Based Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMap [3.04585143845864]
This paper presents Ovid, a novel attention-based method for vandalism detection in OpenStreetMap.
Ovid relies on a novel neural architecture that adopts a multi-head attention mechanism to summarize information indicating vandalism from OSM changesets effectively.
We extract a dataset of real-world vandalism incidents from the OSM edit history for the first time and provide this dataset as open data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-25T15:52:54Z) - Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the
Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers.
We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions.
We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z) - Improving the Adversarial Robustness for Speaker Verification by Self-Supervised Learning [95.60856995067083]
This work is among the first to perform adversarial defense for ASV without knowing the specific attack algorithms.
We propose to perform adversarial defense from two perspectives: 1) adversarial perturbation purification and 2) adversarial perturbation detection.
Experimental results show that our detection module effectively shields the ASV by detecting adversarial samples with an accuracy of around 80%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T07:10:54Z) - Learning for Detecting Norm Violation in Online Communities [3.480626767752489]
We propose a framework capable of detecting norm violations in online communities.
We build our framework using Machine Learning, with Logistic Model Trees as the classification algorithm.
Our work is then evaluated with the Wikipedia use case where we focus on the norm that prohibits vandalism in Wikipedia edits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-30T11:18:04Z) - Arms Race in Adversarial Malware Detection: A Survey [33.8941961394801]
Malicious software (malware) is a major cyber threat that has to be tackled with Machine Learning (ML) techniques.
ML is vulnerable to attacks known as adversarial examples.
Knowing the defender's feature set is critical to the success of transfer attacks.
The effectiveness of adversarial training depends on the defender's capability in identifying the most powerful attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-24T07:20:42Z) - Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and
active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning
and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security.
In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.