On the Computation of Meaning, Language Models and Incomprehensible Horrors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.12686v2
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:41:25 GMT
• Title: On the Computation of Meaning, Language Models and Incomprehensible Horrors
• Authors: Michael Timothy Bennett,
• Abstract summary: We integrate foundational theories of meaning with a mathematical formalism of artificial general intelligence (AGI) Our findings shed light on the relationship between meaning and intelligence, and how we can build machines that comprehend and intend meaning.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We integrate foundational theories of meaning with a mathematical formalism of artificial general intelligence (AGI) to offer a comprehensive mechanistic explanation of meaning, communication, and symbol emergence. This synthesis holds significance for both AGI and broader debates concerning the nature of language, as it unifies pragmatics, logical truth conditional semantics, Peircean semiotics, and a computable model of enactive cognition, addressing phenomena that have traditionally evaded mechanistic explanation. By examining the conditions under which a machine can generate meaningful utterances or comprehend human meaning, we establish that the current generation of language models do not possess the same understanding of meaning as humans nor intend any meaning that we might attribute to their responses. To address this, we propose simulating human feelings and optimising models to construct weak representations. Our findings shed light on the relationship between meaning and intelligence, and how we can build machines that comprehend and intend meaning.

Related papers

• A Complexity-Based Theory of Compositionality [53.025566128892066]
  In AI, compositional representations can enable a powerful form of out-of-distribution generalization. Here, we propose a formal definition of compositionality that accounts for and extends our intuitions about compositionality. The definition is conceptually simple, quantitative, grounded in algorithmic information theory, and applicable to any representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T18:37:27Z)
• Meaning and understanding in large language models [0.0]
  Recent developments in the generative large language models (LLMs) of artificial intelligence have led to the belief that traditional philosophical assumptions about machine understanding of language need to be revised. This article critically evaluates the prevailing tendency to regard machine language performance as mere syntactic manipulation and the simulation of understanding, which is only partial and very shallow, without sufficient referential grounding in the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T14:06:14Z)
• Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis, Inference and Explanation [56.41963802804953]
  We show how large language models can perform scientific synthesis, inference, and explanation. We show that the large language model can augment this "knowledge" by synthesizing from the scientific literature. This approach has the further advantage that the large language model can explain the machine learning system's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T02:17:59Z)
• From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thought [124.40905824051079]
  We propose rational meaning construction, a computational framework for language-informed thinking. We frame linguistic meaning as a context-sensitive mapping from natural language into a probabilistic language of thought. We show that LLMs can generate context-sensitive translations that capture pragmatically-appropriate linguistic meanings. We extend our framework to integrate cognitively-motivated symbolic modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T05:14:00Z)
• Semantics, Ontology and Explanation [0.0]
  We discuss the relation between ontological unpacking and other forms of explanation in philosophy and science. We also discuss the relation between ontological unpacking and other forms of explanation in the area of Artificial Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T16:54:34Z)
• Scientific Explanation and Natural Language: A Unified Epistemological-Linguistic Perspective for Explainable AI [2.7920304852537536]
  This paper focuses on the scientific domain, aiming to bridge the gap between theory and practice on the notion of a scientific explanation. Through a mixture of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, the presented study allows deriving the following main conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T22:31:42Z)
• Emergence of Machine Language: Towards Symbolic Intelligence with Neural Networks [73.94290462239061]
  We propose to combine symbolism and connectionism principles by using neural networks to derive a discrete representation. By designing an interactive environment and task, we demonstrated that machines could generate a spontaneous, flexible, and semantic language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T14:54:58Z)
• Compositional Processing Emerges in Neural Networks Solving Math Problems [100.80518350845668]
  Recent progress in artificial neural networks has shown that when large models are trained on enough linguistic data, grammatical structure emerges in their representations. We extend this work to the domain of mathematical reasoning, where it is possible to formulate precise hypotheses about how meanings should be composed. Our work shows that neural networks are not only able to infer something about the structured relationships implicit in their training data, but can also deploy this knowledge to guide the composition of individual meanings into composite wholes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T07:24:42Z)
• Understanding understanding: a renormalization group inspired model of (artificial) intelligence [0.0]
  This paper is about the meaning of understanding in scientific and in artificial intelligent systems. We give a mathematical definition of the understanding, where, contrary to the common wisdom, we define the probability space on the input set. We show, how scientific understanding fits into this framework, and demonstrate, what is the difference between a scientific task and pattern recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T11:11:46Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.