Related papers: ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Time

ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Time

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14106v2
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:33:25 GMT
Title: ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Time
Authors: Shangqing Tu, Chunyang Li, Jifan Yu, Xiaozhi Wang, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li,
Abstract summary: ChatGPT has achieved great success and can be considered to have acquired an infrastructural status. Existing benchmarks encounter two challenges: (1) Disregard for periodical evaluation and (2) Lack of fine-grained features. We construct ChatLog, an ever-updating dataset with large-scale records of diverse long-form ChatGPT responses for 21 NLP benchmarks from March, 2023 to now.
Score: 54.18651663847874
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: ChatGPT has achieved great success and can be considered to have acquired an infrastructural status. There are abundant works for evaluating ChatGPT on benchmarks. However, existing benchmarks encounter two challenges: (1) Disregard for periodical evaluation and (2) Lack of fine-grained features. In this paper, we construct ChatLog, an ever-updating dataset with large-scale records of diverse long-form ChatGPT responses for 21 NLP benchmarks from March, 2023 to now. We conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation to find that most capabilities of ChatGPT improve over time except for some abilities, and there exists a step-wise evolving pattern of ChatGPT. We further analyze the inherent characteristics of ChatGPT by extracting the knowledge and linguistic features. We find some stable features that stay unchanged and apply them on the detection of ChatGPT-generated texts to improve the robustness of cross-version detection. We will continuously maintain our project at \url{https://github.com/THU-KEG/ChatLog/}.

Related papers

Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets [19.521390684403293]
We present a thorough evaluation of ChatGPT's performance on diverse academic datasets. Specifically, we evaluate ChatGPT across 140 tasks and analyze 255K responses it generates in these datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T12:37:21Z)
Evaluating ChatGPT's Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulness [18.945934162722466]
We focus on assessing the overall ability of ChatGPT using 7 fine-grained information extraction (IE) tasks. ChatGPT's performance in Standard-IE setting is poor, but it surprisingly exhibits excellent performance in the OpenIE setting. ChatGPT provides high-quality and trustworthy explanations for its decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-23T12:33:18Z)
Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Tasks [9.740764281808588]
ChatGPT has the potential to reproduce human-generated label annotations in social computing tasks. We relabel five datasets covering stance detection (2x), sentiment analysis, hate speech, and bot detection. Our results highlight that ChatGPT does have the potential to handle these data annotation tasks, although a number of challenges remain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T08:08:12Z)
A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's zero-shot Text-to-SQL capability [57.71052396828714]
This paper presents the first comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's Text-to- abilities. We conducted experiments on 12 benchmark datasets with different languages, settings, or scenarios. Although there is still a gap from the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) model performance, ChatGPT's performance is still impressive.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-12T04:22:01Z)
Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study [121.77986688862302]
We provide a preliminary meta-evaluation on ChatGPT to show its reliability as an NLG metric. Experimental results show that compared with previous automatic metrics, ChatGPT achieves state-of-the-art or competitive correlation with human judgments. We hope our preliminary study could prompt the emergence of a general-purposed reliable NLG metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T16:57:20Z)
Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)
Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.