Generative AI Perceptions: A Survey to Measure the Perceptions of Faculty, Staff, and Students on Generative AI Tools in Academia

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14415v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 23:08:39 GMT
• Title: Generative AI Perceptions: A Survey to Measure the Perceptions of Faculty, Staff, and Students on Generative AI Tools in Academia
• Authors: Sara Amani, Lance White, Trini Balart, Laksha Arora, Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Dr. Kelly Brumbelow, and Dr. Karan L. Watson
• Abstract summary: ChatGPT is a natural language processing tool that can engage in human-like conversations. This paper focuses on how ChatGPT is revolutionizing the realm of engineering education. A survey was created to measure the effects of ChatGPT on students, faculty, and staff.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: ChatGPT is a natural language processing tool that can engage in human-like conversations and generate coherent and contextually relevant responses to various prompts. ChatGPT is capable of understanding natural text that is input by a user and generating appropriate responses in various forms. This tool represents a major step in how humans are interacting with technology. This paper specifically focuses on how ChatGPT is revolutionizing the realm of engineering education and the relationship between technology, students, and faculty and staff. Because this tool is quickly changing and improving with the potential for even greater future capability, it is a critical time to collect pertinent data. A survey was created to measure the effects of ChatGPT on students, faculty, and staff. This survey is shared as a Texas A&M University technical report to allow other universities and entities to use this survey and measure the effects elsewhere.

Related papers

• Exploring ChatGPT and its Impact on Society [7.652195319352287]
  ChatGPT is a large language model that can generate human-like responses in a conversational context. It has the potential to revolutionize various industries and transform the way we interact with technology. However, the use of ChatGPT has also raised several concerns, including ethical, social, and employment challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:44:35Z)
• AutoConv: Automatically Generating Information-seeking Conversations with Large Language Models [74.10293412011455]
  We propose AutoConv for synthetic conversation generation. Specifically, we formulate the conversation generation problem as a language modeling task. We finetune an LLM with a few human conversations to capture the characteristics of the information-seeking process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-12T08:52:40Z)
• Is ChatGPT Involved in Texts? Measure the Polish Ratio to Detect ChatGPT-Generated Text [48.36706154871577]
  We introduce a novel dataset termed HPPT (ChatGPT-polished academic abstracts) It diverges from extant corpora by comprising pairs of human-written and ChatGPT-polished abstracts instead of purely ChatGPT-generated texts. We also propose the "Polish Ratio" method, an innovative measure of the degree of modification made by ChatGPT compared to the original human-written text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T06:38:37Z)
• Transformative Effects of ChatGPT on Modern Education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots [36.760677949631514]
  ChatGPT was released to provide coherent and useful replies based on analysis of large volumes of data. Our preliminary evaluation concludes that ChatGPT performed differently in each subject area including finance, coding and maths. There are clear drawbacks in its use, such as the possibility of producing inaccurate or false data. Academic regulations and evaluation practices need to be updated, should ChatGPT be used as a tool in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T17:35:57Z)
• Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses [15.642614735026106]
  We compare the performance of ChatGPT against students on 32 university-level courses. We find that ChatGPT's performance is comparable, if not superior, to that of students in many courses. We find an emerging consensus among students to use the tool, and among educators to treat this as plagiarism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-07T10:37:51Z)
• ChatGPT in the Classroom: An Analysis of Its Strengths and Weaknesses for Solving Undergraduate Computer Science Questions [5.962828109329824]
  ChatGPT is an AI language model developed by OpenAI that can understand and generate human-like text. There is concern that students may leverage ChatGPT to complete take-home assignments and exams and obtain favorable grades without genuinely acquiring knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T17:26:32Z)
• ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning [70.57126720079971]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as the most important breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) This paper evaluates ChatGPT on 7 different tasks, covering 37 diverse languages with high, medium, low, and extremely low resources. Compared to the performance of previous models, our extensive experimental results demonstrate a worse performance of ChatGPT for different NLP tasks and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T05:08:52Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• On the Educational Impact of ChatGPT: Is Artificial Intelligence Ready to Obtain a University Degree? [0.0]
  We evaluate the influence of ChatGPT on university education. We discuss how computer science higher education should adapt to tools like ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:27:37Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
• Can You be More Social? Injecting Politeness and Positivity into Task-Oriented Conversational Agents [60.27066549589362]
  Social language used by human agents is associated with greater users' responsiveness and task completion. The model uses a sequence-to-sequence deep learning architecture, extended with a social language understanding element. Evaluation in terms of content preservation and social language level using both human judgment and automatic linguistic measures shows that the model can generate responses that enable agents to address users' issues in a more socially appropriate way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T08:22:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.