Data-Driven Subgroup Identification for Linear Regression
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00195v1
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 08:32:09 GMT
- Title: Data-Driven Subgroup Identification for Linear Regression
- Abstract summary: We propose DDGroup, a data-driven method to identify subgroups in the data with a uniform linear relationship between the features and the label.
We show theoretically that DDGroup recovers a region where a single linear model with low variance is well-specified.
Experiments show that DDGroup can uncover subgroups with qualitatively different relationships which are missed by simply applying parametric approaches to the whole dataset.
- Score: 15.709279037284054
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Medical studies frequently require to extract the relationship between each
covariate and the outcome with statistical confidence measures. To do this,
simple parametric models are frequently used (e.g. coefficients of linear
regression) but usually fitted on the whole dataset. However, it is common that
the covariates may not have a uniform effect over the whole population and thus
a unified simple model can miss the heterogeneous signal. For example, a linear
model may be able to explain a subset of the data but fail on the rest due to
the nonlinearity and heterogeneity in the data. In this paper, we propose
DDGroup (data-driven group discovery), a data-driven method to effectively
identify subgroups in the data with a uniform linear relationship between the
features and the label. DDGroup outputs an interpretable region in which the
linear model is expected to hold. It is simple to implement and computationally
tractable for use. We show theoretically that, given a large enough sample,
DDGroup recovers a region where a single linear model with low variance is
well-specified (if one exists), and experiments on real-world medical datasets
confirm that it can discover regions where a local linear model has improved
performance. Our experiments also show that DDGroup can uncover subgroups with
qualitatively different relationships which are missed by simply applying
parametric approaches to the whole dataset.
Related papers
- Critical Percolation as a Synthetic Data Model for Interpretability [0.0]
We introduce a family of synthetic datasets consisting of hierarchical functions defined on critical mean-field percolation clusters.<n>Latent variables modeling a taxonomic hierarchy generate each data point's target value.<n>We find that the model's ground-truth latent variables can be linearly decoded from neural network activations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T15:15:57Z) - Impugan: Learning Conditional Generative Models for Robust Data Imputation [0.21847754147782886]
Impugan is a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) for imputing missing values and integrating heterogeneous datasets.<n>During inference, the generator reconstructs missing entries from available features, and the discriminator enforces realism by distinguishing true from imputed data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-05T18:46:33Z) - Nonparametric Data Attribution for Diffusion Models [57.820618036556084]
Data attribution for generative models seeks to quantify the influence of individual training examples on model outputs.<n>We propose a nonparametric attribution method that operates entirely on data, measuring influence via patch-level similarity between generated and training images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T03:37:16Z) - Data Pruning in Generative Diffusion Models [2.0111637969968]
Generative models aim to estimate the underlying distribution of the data, so presumably they should benefit from larger datasets.
We show that eliminating redundant or noisy data in large datasets is beneficial particularly when done strategically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-19T14:13:25Z) - Data thinning for convolution-closed distributions [2.299914829977005]
We propose data thinning, an approach for splitting an observation into two or more independent parts that sum to the original observation.
We show that data thinning can be used to validate the results of unsupervised learning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T02:47:41Z) - Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular
data [81.43750358586072]
We propose Data-IQ, a framework to systematically stratify examples into subgroups with respect to their outcomes.
We experimentally demonstrate the benefits of Data-IQ on four real-world medical datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T08:57:55Z) - Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis.
We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z) - A new LDA formulation with covariates [3.1690891866882236]
The Latent Dirichlet Allocation model is a popular method for creating mixed-membership clusters.
We propose a new formulation for the LDA model which incorporates covariates.
We use slice sampling within a Gibbs sampling algorithm to estimate model parameters.
The model is illustrated using real data sets from three different areas: text-mining of Coronavirus articles, analysis of grocery shopping baskets, and ecology of tree species on Barro Colorado Island (Panama)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-18T19:58:24Z) - Evaluation of Tree Based Regression over Multiple Linear Regression for
Non-normally Distributed Data in Battery Performance [0.5735035463793008]
This study explores the impact of data normality in building machine learning models.
Tree-based regression models and multiple linear regressions models are each built from a highly skewed non-normal dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:28:24Z) - Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics.
We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data.
Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z) - Commutative Lie Group VAE for Disentanglement Learning [96.32813624341833]
We view disentanglement learning as discovering an underlying structure that equivariantly reflects the factorized variations shown in data.
A simple model named Commutative Lie Group VAE is introduced to realize the group-based disentanglement learning.
Experiments show that our model can effectively learn disentangled representations without supervision, and can achieve state-of-the-art performance without extra constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T07:03:14Z) - Field-wise Learning for Multi-field Categorical Data [27.100048708707593]
We propose a new method for learning with multi-field categorical data.
In doing this, the models can be fitted to each category and thus can better capture the underlying differences in data.
The experiment results on two large-scale datasets show the superior performance of our model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-01T01:10:14Z) - Robust Finite Mixture Regression for Heterogeneous Targets [70.19798470463378]
We propose an FMR model that finds sample clusters and jointly models multiple incomplete mixed-type targets simultaneously.
We provide non-asymptotic oracle performance bounds for our model under a high-dimensional learning framework.
The results show that our model can achieve state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-12T03:27:07Z) - Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers.
We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model.
Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.