Activation Functions Not To Active: A Plausible Theory on Interpreting Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00663v2
• Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 07:10:11 GMT
• Title: Activation Functions Not To Active: A Plausible Theory on Interpreting Neural Networks
• Abstract summary: Researchers believe that neural networks model a high-dimensional space but cannot give a clear definition of this space. We develop a plausible theory on interpreting neural networks in terms of the role of activation functions in neural networks. We show that the activation function acts as a magnifying function that maps the low-dimensional linear space into an infinite-dimensional space.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Researchers commonly believe that neural networks model a high-dimensional space but cannot give a clear definition of this space. What is this space? What is its dimension? And does it has finite dimensions? In this paper, we develop a plausible theory on interpreting neural networks in terms of the role of activation functions in neural networks and define a high-dimensional (more precisely, an infinite-dimensional) space that neural networks including deep-learning networks could create. We show that the activation function acts as a magnifying function that maps the low-dimensional linear space into an infinite-dimensional space, which can distinctly identify the polynomial approximation of any multivariate continuous function of the variable values being the same features of the given dataset. Given a dataset with each example of $d$ features $f_1$, $f_2$, $\cdots$, $f_d$, we believe that neural networks model a special space with infinite dimensions, each of which is a monomial $$\prod_{i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_d} f_1^{i_1} f_2^{i_2} \cdots f_d^{i_d}$$ for some non-negative integers ${i_1, i_2, \cdots, i_d} \in \mathbb{Z}_{0}^{+}=\{0,1,2,3,\ldots\} $. We term such an infinite-dimensional space a $\textit{ Super Space (SS)}$. We see such a dimension as the minimum information unit. Every neuron node previously through an activation layer in neural networks is a $\textit{ Super Plane (SP) }$, which is actually a polynomial of infinite degree. This $\textit{ Super Space }$ is something like a coordinate system, in which every multivalue function can be represented by a $\textit{ Super Plane }$. We also show that training NNs could at least be reduced to solving a system of nonlinear equations. %solve sets of nonlinear equations

Related papers

• Neural Networks Learn Generic Multi-Index Models Near Information-Theoretic Limit [66.20349460098275]
  We study the gradient descent learning of a general Gaussian Multi-index model $f(boldsymbolx)=g(boldsymbolUboldsymbolx)$ with hidden subspace $boldsymbolUin mathbbRrtimes d$.<n>We prove that under generic non-degenerate assumptions on the link function, a standard two-layer neural network trained via layer-wise gradient descent can agnostically learn the target with $o_d(1)$ test error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T04:46:47Z)
• Neural Networks and (Virtual) Extended Formulations [5.762677915745415]
  We prove lower bounds on the size of neural networks that optimize over $P$. We show that $mathrmxc(P)$ is a lower bound on the size of any monotone or input neural network that solves the linear optimization problem over $P$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:12:11Z)
• Mathematical Models of Computation in Superposition [0.9374652839580183]
  Superposition poses a serious challenge to mechanistically interpreting current AI systems. We present mathematical models of emphcomputation in superposition, where superposition is actively helpful for efficiently accomplishing the task. We conclude by providing some potential applications of our work for interpreting neural networks that implement computation in superposition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-10T06:11:48Z)
• Learning Hierarchical Polynomials with Three-Layer Neural Networks [56.71223169861528]
  We study the problem of learning hierarchical functions over the standard Gaussian distribution with three-layer neural networks. For a large subclass of degree $k$s $p$, a three-layer neural network trained via layerwise gradientp descent on the square loss learns the target $h$ up to vanishing test error. This work demonstrates the ability of three-layer neural networks to learn complex features and as a result, learn a broad class of hierarchical functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T02:19:32Z)
• Why should autoencoders work? [1.6317061277457001]
  Deep neural network autoencoders are routinely used for model reduction. We show that the technique is found to "work" well, which leads one to ask if there is a way to explain this effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T17:53:43Z)
• Understanding Deep Neural Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning via $\epsilon$-Greedy Exploration [53.90873926758026]
  This paper provides a theoretical study of deep neural function approximation in reinforcement learning (RL) We focus on the value based algorithm with the $epsilon$-greedy exploration via deep (and two-layer) neural networks endowed by Besov (and Barron) function spaces. Our analysis reformulates the temporal difference error in an $L2(mathrmdmu)$-integrable space over a certain averaged measure $mu$, and transforms it to a generalization problem under the non-iid setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T15:42:47Z)
• Shallow neural network representation of polynomials [91.3755431537592]
  We show that $d$-variables of degreeR$ can be represented on $[0,1]d$ as shallow neural networks of width $d+1+sum_r=2Rbinomr+d-1d-1d-1[binomr+d-1d-1d-1[binomr+d-1d-1d-1[binomr+d-1d-1d-1d-1[binomr+d-1d-1d-1d-1
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T08:14:52Z)
• Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descent [68.95262816363288]
  In specific regimes, neural networks trained by gradient descent behave like kernel methods. In practice, it is known that neural networks strongly outperform their associated kernels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T09:24:02Z)
• Approximation of Functionals by Neural Network without Curse of Dimensionality [12.717839871971517]
  In this paper, we establish a neural network to approximate functionals. The key idea of the approximation is to define a Barron space of functionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T13:09:43Z)
• Deep Network Approximation: Achieving Arbitrary Accuracy with Fixed Number of Neurons [5.37133760455631]
  We develop feed-forward neural networks that achieve the universal approximation property for all continuous functions with a fixed finite number of neurons. We prove that $sigma$-activated networks with width $36d(2d+1)$ and depth $11$ can approximate any continuous function on a $d$-dimensioanl hypercube within an arbitrarily small error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T05:24:30Z)
• A deep network construction that adapts to intrinsic dimensionality beyond the domain [79.23797234241471]
  We study the approximation of two-layer compositions $f(x) = g(phi(x))$ via deep networks with ReLU activation. We focus on two intuitive and practically relevant choices for $phi$: the projection onto a low-dimensional embedded submanifold and a distance to a collection of low-dimensional sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-06T09:50:29Z)
• Nonclosedness of Sets of Neural Networks in Sobolev Spaces [0.0]
  We show that realized neural networks are not closed in order-$(m-1)$ Sobolev spaces $Wm-1,p$ for $p in [1,infty]$. For a real analytic activation function, we show that sets of realized neural networks are not closed in $Wk,p$ for any $k in mathbbN$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T00:57:25Z)
• Learning Over-Parametrized Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks beyond NTK [58.5766737343951]
  We consider the dynamic of descent for learning a two-layer neural network. We show that an over-parametrized two-layer neural network can provably learn with gradient loss at most ground with Tangent samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T07:09:28Z)
• On the Modularity of Hypernetworks [103.1147622394852]
  We show that for a structured target function, the overall number of trainable parameters in a hypernetwork is smaller by orders of magnitude than the number of trainable parameters of a standard neural network and an embedding method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T22:51:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.