Deconstructing Student Perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) through an Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)-based Instrument

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01186v1
• Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 03:40:13 GMT
• Title: Deconstructing Student Perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) through an Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)-based Instrument
• Authors: Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan, Wenxin Zhou
• Abstract summary: This study examines the relationship between student perceptions and their intention to use generative AI in higher education. A questionnaire was developed to measure students' knowledge of generative AI, perceived value, and perceived cost.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This study examines the relationship between student perceptions and their intention to use generative AI in higher education. Drawing on Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT), a questionnaire was developed to measure students' knowledge of generative AI, perceived value, and perceived cost. A sample of 405 students participated in the study, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the constructs. The results indicate a strong positive correlation between perceived value and intention to use generative AI, and a weak negative correlation between perceived cost and intention to use. As we continue to explore the implications of generative AI in education and other domains, it is crucial to carefully consider the potential long-term consequences and the ethical dilemmas that may arise from widespread adoption.

Related papers

• Perceptions of Discriminatory Decisions of Artificial Intelligence: Unpacking the Role of Individual Characteristics [0.0]
  Personal differences (digital self-efficacy, technical knowledge, belief in equality, political ideology) are associated with perceptions of AI outcomes. Digital self-efficacy and technical knowledge are positively associated with attitudes toward AI. Liberal ideologies are negatively associated with outcome trust, higher negative emotion, and greater skepticism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:18:26Z)
• Predicting the Impact of Generative AI Using an Agent-Based Model [0.0]
  Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems have transformed industries by autonomously generating content that mimics human creativity. This paper employs agent-based modeling (ABM) to explore these implications. The ABM integrates individual, business, and governmental agents to simulate dynamics such as education, skills acquisition, AI adoption, and regulatory responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T13:13:56Z)
• Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation [68.03658922067487]
  This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T05:56:04Z)
• A Meta-analysis of College Students' Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence [5.13644976086965]
  This study conducted a meta-analysis of 27 empirical studies under an integrated theoretical framework. Main variables are strongly correlated with students' behavioural intention to use GenAI. Gender, notably, only moderated attitudes on students' behavioural intention to use GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T15:46:57Z)
• Generative AI Adoption in Classroom in Context of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT) [1.9659095632676098]
  This study aims to dissect the underlying factors influencing educators' perceptions and acceptance of GenAI and LLMs. Our investigation reveals a strong positive correlation between the perceived usefulness of GenAI tools and their acceptance. The perceived ease of use emerged as a significant factor, though to a lesser extent, influencing acceptance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T22:41:51Z)
• Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors [2.217351976766501]
  This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models. We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI. While CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T19:21:29Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• Cognitive Diagnosis with Explicit Student Vector Estimation and Unsupervised Question Matrix Learning [53.79108239032941]
  We propose an explicit student vector estimation (ESVE) method to estimate the student vectors of DINA. We also propose an unsupervised method called bidirectional calibration algorithm (HBCA) to label the Q-matrix automatically. The experimental results on two real-world datasets show that ESVE-DINA outperforms the DINA model on accuracy and that the Q-matrix labeled automatically by HBCA can achieve performance comparable to that obtained with the manually labeled Q-matrix.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T03:53:19Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.