A Meta-analysis of College Students' Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06712v1
• Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:46:57 GMT
• Title: A Meta-analysis of College Students' Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Yifei Diao, Ziyi Li, Jiateng Zhou, Wei Gao, Xin Gong,
• Abstract summary: This study conducted a meta-analysis of 27 empirical studies under an integrated theoretical framework. Main variables are strongly correlated with students' behavioural intention to use GenAI. Gender, notably, only moderated attitudes on students' behavioural intention to use GenAI.
• Score: 5.13644976086965
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: It is of critical importance to analyse the factors influencing college students' intention to use generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to understand and predict learners' learning behaviours and academic outcomes. Nevertheless, a lack of congruity has been shown in extant research results. This study, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis of 27 empirical studies under an integrated theoretical framework, including 87 effect sizes of independent research and 33,833 sample data. The results revealed that the main variables are strongly correlated with students' behavioural intention to use GenAI. Among them, performance expectancy (r = 0.389) and attitudes (r = 0.576) play particularly critical roles, and effort expectancy and habit are moderated by locational factors. Gender, notably, only moderated attitudes on students' behavioural intention to use GenAI. This study provides valuable insights for addressing the debate regarding students' intention to use GenAI in existed research, improving educational technology, as well as offering support for school decision-makers and educators to apply GenAI in school settings.

Related papers

• Early Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Computing Education: Emergent Student Use Cases and Perspectives in 2023 [38.83649319653387]
  There is limited prior research on computing students' use and perceptions of GenAI. We surveyed all computer science majors in a small engineering-focused R1 university. We discuss the impact of our findings on the emerging conversation around GenAI and education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T20:17:47Z)
• Misconceptions, Pragmatism, and Value Tensions: Evaluating Students' Understanding and Perception of Generative AI for Education [0.11704154007740832]
  Students are early adopters of the technology, utilizing it in atypical ways. Students were asked to describe 1) their understanding of GenAI; 2) their use of GenAI; 3) their opinions on the benefits, downsides, and ethical issues pertaining to its use in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:41:06Z)
• Hey GPT, Can You be More Racist? Analysis from Crowdsourced Attempts to Elicit Biased Content from Generative AI [41.96102438774773]
  This work presents the findings from a university-level competition, which challenged participants to design prompts for eliciting biased outputs from GenAI tools. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the competition submissions and identify a diverse set of biases in GenAI and strategies employed by participants to induce bias in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:44:45Z)
• Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedback [0.0]
  The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education necessitates assessment reform. This study addresses a critical gap by exploring student and academic staff experiences with AI and GenAI tools. An online survey collected data from 35 academic staff and 282 students across two universities in Vietnam and one in Singapore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T10:25:01Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• RealBehavior: A Framework for Faithfully Characterizing Foundation Models' Human-like Behavior Mechanisms [45.97077960079147]
  We introduce a framework, RealBehavior, which is designed to characterize the humanoid behaviors of models faithfully. Our findings suggest that a simple application of psychological tools cannot faithfully characterize all human-like behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T12:58:17Z)
• Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting [64.80538055623842]
  sociodemographic prompting is a technique that steers the output of prompt-based models towards answers that humans with specific sociodemographic profiles would give. We show that sociodemographic information affects model predictions and can be beneficial for improving zero-shot learning in subjective NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T15:42:06Z)
• Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption [0.0]
  We introduce "AI-Lab," a framework for guiding students in effectively leveraging GenAI within core programming courses. By identifying and rectifying GenAI's errors, students enrich their learning process. For educators, AI-Lab provides mechanisms to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T17:20:37Z)
• Deconstructing Student Perceptions of Generative AI (GenAI) through an Expectancy Value Theory (EVT)-based Instrument [0.0]
  This study examines the relationship between student perceptions and their intention to use generative AI in higher education. A questionnaire was developed to measure students' knowledge of generative AI, perceived value, and perceived cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T03:40:13Z)
• Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education [2.0711789781518752]
  This study explores university students' perceptions of generative AI (GenAI) technologies, such as ChatGPT, in higher education. Students recognized the potential for personalized learning support, writing and brainstorming assistance, and research and analysis capabilities. Concerns about accuracy, privacy, ethical issues, and the impact on personal development, career prospects, and societal values were also expressed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-29T15:53:38Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.