Fears about AI-mediated communication are grounded in different
expectations for one's own versus others' use
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01670v1
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 14:54:07 GMT
- Title: Fears about AI-mediated communication are grounded in different
expectations for one's own versus others' use
- Authors: Zoe A. Purcell, Mengchen Dong, Anne-Marie Nussberger, Nils K\"obis,
and Maurice Jakesch
- Abstract summary: AI-mediated communication technologies (AICTs) are digital tools that use AI to augment interpersonal messages.
This paper assesses perceptions about the acceptability and use of open and secret AICTs for oneself and others.
- Score: 0.5872014229110214
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid development of AI-mediated communication technologies (AICTs),
which are digital tools that use AI to augment interpersonal messages, has
raised concerns about the future of interpersonal trust and prompted
discussions about disclosure and uptake. This paper contributes to this
discussion by assessing perceptions about the acceptability and use of open and
secret AICTs for oneself and others. In two studies with representative samples
(UK: N=477, US: N=765), we found that secret AICT use is deemed less acceptable
than open AICT use, people tend to overestimate others' AICT use, and people
expect others to use AICTs irresponsibly. Thus, we raise concerns about the
potential for misperceptions and different expectations for others to drive
self-fulfilling pessimistic outlooks about AI-mediated communication.
Related papers
- Semantic Communication Networks Empowered Artificial Intelligence of Things [2.590720801978138]
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of security and privacy threats across various layers of semantic communication systems.
We identify critical open issues in this burgeoning field warranting further investigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T14:39:28Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions [6.724854390957174]
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective.
Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T20:26:49Z) - From Text to Self: Users' Perceptions of Potential of AI on
Interpersonal Communication and Self [18.298794560324588]
We conducted a one-week diary and interview study to explore users' perceptions of AI-mediated communication (AIMC) tools.
Our findings indicate that participants view AIMC support favorably, citing benefits such as increased communication confidence.
However, the study also uncovers current limitations of AIMC tools, including verbosity, unnatural responses, and excessive emotional intensity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T02:19:10Z) - What drives the acceptance of AI technology?: the role of expectations
and experiences [0.0]
The acceptance intention towards artificial intelligence is greatly influenced by the experience with current AI products and services, expectations for AI, and past experiences with ICT technology.
The analysis results of this study reveal that AI experience and past ICT experience are associated with a greater intention to accept AI.
It is essential to provide potential AI users with specific information about the features and benefits of AI products and services.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-17T02:47:48Z) - The Internet of Senses: Building on Semantic Communications and Edge
Intelligence [67.75406096878321]
The Internet of Senses (IoS) holds the promise of flawless telepresence-style communication for all human receptors'
We elaborate on how the emerging semantic communications and Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning (ML) paradigms may satisfy the requirements of IoS use cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T03:37:38Z) - Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication
Perspective [56.80107647520364]
We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH.
We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users.
We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - Measuring Ethics in AI with AI: A Methodology and Dataset Construction [1.6861004263551447]
We propose to use such newfound capabilities of AI technologies to augment our AI measuring capabilities.
We do so by training a model to classify publications related to ethical issues and concerns.
We highlight the implications of AI metrics, in particular their contribution towards developing trustful and fair AI-based tools and technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-26T00:26:12Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.