Well-being policy evaluation methodology based on WE pluralism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04500v1
• Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 06:51:43 GMT
• Title: Well-being policy evaluation methodology based on WE pluralism
• Authors: Takeshi Kato
• Abstract summary: This study shifts from pluralism based on objective indicators to conceptual pluralism that emphasizes subjective context. By combining well-being and joint fact-finding on the narrow-wide WE consensus, the policy evaluation method is formulated.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Methodologies for evaluating and selecting policies that contribute to the well-being of diverse populations need clarification. To bridge the gap between objective indicators and policies related to well-being, this study shifts from constitutive pluralism based on objective indicators to conceptual pluralism that emphasizes subjective context, develops from subject-object pluralism through individual-group pluralism to WE pluralism, and presents a new policy evaluation method that combines joint fact-finding based on policy plurality. First, to evaluate policies involving diverse stakeholders, I develop from individual subjectivity-objectivity to individual subjectivity and group intersubjectivity, and then move to a narrow-wide WE pluralism in the gradation of I-family-community-municipality-nation-world. Additionally, by referring to some functional forms of well-being, I formulate the dependence of well-being on narrow-wide WE. Finally, given that policies themselves have a plurality of social, ecological, and economic values, I define a set of policies for each of the narrow-wide WE and consider a mapping between the two to provide an evaluation basis. Furthermore, by combining well-being and joint fact-finding on the narrow-wide WE consensus, the policy evaluation method is formulated. The fact-value combined parameter system, combined policy-making approach, and combined impact evaluation are disclosed as examples of implementation. This paper contributes to the realization of a well-being society by bridging philosophical theory and policies based on WE pluralism and presenting a new method of policy evaluation based on subjective context and consensus building.

Related papers

• Policy Aggregation [21.21314301021803]
  We consider the challenge of AI value alignment with multiple individuals with different reward functions and optimal policies in an underlying Markov decision process. We formalize this problem as one of policy aggregation, where the goal is to identify a desirable collective policy. Key insight is that social choice methods can be reinterpreted by identifying ordinal preferences with volumes of subsets of the state-action occupancy polytope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T04:19:50Z)
• Inducing Political Bias Allows Language Models Anticipate Partisan Reactions to Controversies [5.958974943807783]
  This study addresses the challenge of understanding political bias in digitized discourse using Large Language Models (LLMs) We present a comprehensive analytical framework, consisting of Partisan Bias Divergence Assessment and Partisan Class Tendency Prediction. Our findings reveal the model's effectiveness in capturing emotional and moral nuances, albeit with some challenges in stance detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:57:53Z)
• Subjective-objective policy making approach: Coupling of resident-values multiple regression analysis with value-indices, multi-agent-based simulation [0.0]
  This study proposes a new combined subjective-objective policy evaluation approach to choose better policy. The proposed approach establishes a subjective target function based on a multiple regression analysis of the results of a residents questionnaire survey. Using the new approach to compare several policies enables concrete expression of the will of stakeholders with diverse values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T02:33:32Z)
• KPEval: Towards Fine-Grained Semantic-Based Keyphrase Evaluation [69.57018875757622]
  We propose KPEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework consisting of four critical aspects: reference agreement, faithfulness, diversity, and utility. Using KPEval, we re-evaluate 23 keyphrase systems and discover that established model comparison results have blind-spots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T17:45:38Z)
• Towards A Unified Policy Abstraction Theory and Representation Learning Approach in Markov Decision Processes [39.94472154078338]
  We propose a unified policy abstraction theory, containing three types of policy abstraction associated to policy features at different levels. We then generalize them to three policy metrics that quantify the distance (i.e., similarity) of policies. For the empirical study, we investigate the efficacy of the proposed policy metrics and representations, in characterizing policy difference and conveying policy generalization respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T03:41:50Z)
• Identification of Subgroups With Similar Benefits in Off-Policy Policy Evaluation [60.71312668265873]
  We develop a method to balance the need for personalization with confident predictions. We show that our method can be used to form accurate predictions of heterogeneous treatment effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T23:19:12Z)
• Supervised Off-Policy Ranking [145.3039527243585]
  Off-policy evaluation (OPE) leverages data generated by other policies to evaluate a target policy. We propose supervised off-policy ranking that learns a policy scoring model by correctly ranking training policies with known performance. Our method outperforms strong baseline OPE methods in terms of both rank correlation and performance gap between the truly best and the best of the ranked top three policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-03T07:01:23Z)
• Active Offline Policy Selection [19.18251239758809]
  This paper addresses the problem of policy selection in domains with abundant logged data, but with a very restricted interaction budget. Several off-policy evaluation (OPE) techniques have been proposed to assess the value of policies using only logged data. We introduce a novel emphactive offline policy selection problem formulation, which combined logged data and limited online interactions to identify the best policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T17:33:13Z)
• Offline Policy Selection under Uncertainty [113.57441913299868]
  We consider offline policy selection as learning preferences over a set of policy prospects given a fixed experience dataset. Access to the full distribution over one's belief of the policy value enables more flexible selection algorithms under a wider range of downstream evaluation metrics. We show how BayesDICE may be used to rank policies with respect to any arbitrary downstream policy selection metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-12T23:09:21Z)
• Learning Goal-oriented Dialogue Policy with Opposite Agent Awareness [116.804536884437]
  We propose an opposite behavior aware framework for policy learning in goal-oriented dialogues. We estimate the opposite agent's policy from its behavior and use this estimation to improve the target agent by regarding it as part of the target policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T03:13:44Z)
• Policy Evaluation Networks [50.53250641051648]
  We introduce a scalable, differentiable fingerprinting mechanism that retains essential policy information in a concise embedding. Our empirical results demonstrate that combining these three elements can produce policies that outperform those that generated the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T23:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.