On a paradox in quantum mechanics and its resolution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08556v2
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 05:00:38 GMT
- Title: On a paradox in quantum mechanics and its resolution
- Authors: Padtarapan Banyadsin and Salvatore De Vincenzo
- Abstract summary: We solve a paradox in the theory of linear operators in Hilbert spaces.
Our results are formulated within the natural framework of wave mechanics.
We think that the content of this paper will be useful to undergraduate and graduate students as well as to their instructors.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Consider a free Schr\"odinger particle inside an interval with walls
characterized by the Dirichlet boundary condition. Choose a parabola as the
normalized state of the particle that satisfies this boundary condition. To
calculate the variance of the Hamiltonian in that state, one needs to calculate
the mean value of the Hamiltonian and that of its square. If one uses the
standard formula to calculate these mean values, one obtains both results
without difficulty, but the variance unexpectedly takes an imaginary value. If
one uses the same expression to calculate these mean values but first writes
the Hamiltonian and its square in terms of their respective eigenfunctions and
eigenvalues, one obtains the same result as above for the mean value of the
Hamiltonian but a different value for its square (in fact, it is not zero);
hence, the variance takes an acceptable value. From whence do these
contradictory results arise? The latter paradox has been presented in the
literature as an example of a problem that can only be properly solved by
making use of certain fundamental concepts within the general theory of linear
operators in Hilbert spaces. Here, we carefully review those concepts and apply
them in a detailed way to resolve the paradox. Our results are formulated
within the natural framework of wave mechanics, and to avoid inconveniences
that the use of Dirac's symbolic formalism could bring, we avoid the use of
that formalism throughout the article. In addition, we obtain a resolution of
the paradox in an entirely formal way without addressing the restrictions
imposed by the domains of the operators involved. We think that the content of
this paper will be useful to undergraduate and graduate students as well as to
their instructors.
Related papers
- Quantum particle in the wrong box (or: the perils of finite-dimensional approximations) [1.4260624980098286]
We show that the solutions of the Schr"odinger equations generated by truncated Hamiltonians do not converge to the solution of the Schr"odinger equation corresponding to the actual Hamiltonian.
Importantly, numerical simulations will unavoidably reproduce the wrong dynamics in the limit, and yet there is no numerical test that can reveal this failure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T13:39:06Z) - Defining coherent states: why must they be eigenstates of the annihilation operator? [0.0]
We show that coherent states are chosen as the most classical ones by the decoherence process induced by coupling the particle to an environment in the standard Quantum Brownian motion model.
We also show that the reason why coherent states are chosen as the most classical ones by the decoherence process induced by coupling the particle to an environment in the standard Quantum Brownian motion model is precisely due to the validity of the two above theorems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T20:18:20Z) - Quantum electrodynamics of lossy magnetodielectric samples in vacuum: modified Langevin noise formalism [55.2480439325792]
We analytically derive the modified Langevin noise formalism from the established canonical quantization of the electromagnetic field in macroscopic media.
We prove that each of the two field parts can be expressed in term of particular bosonic operators, which in turn diagonalize the electromagnetic Hamiltonian.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-07T14:37:04Z) - A non-hermitean momentum operator for the particle in a box [49.1574468325115]
We show how to construct the corresponding hermitean Hamiltonian for the infinite as well as concrete example.
The resulting Hilbert space can be decomposed into a physical and unphysical subspace.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T12:51:58Z) - Biorthogonal Renormalization [0.0]
The biorthogonal formalism extends conventional quantum mechanics to the non-Hermitian realm.
It has been pointed out that the biorthogonal inner product changes with the scaling of the eigenvectors.
We argue when this choice of normalization is of physical importance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T16:07:56Z) - Contextual unification of classical and quantum physics [0.0]
We develop the idea that the usual formalism of quantum mechanics stops working when countable infinities of particles are encountered.
This is because the dimension of the corresponding Hilbert space becomes uncountably infinite, leading to the loss of unitary equivalence.
We show that it provides a natural way to describe the "Heisenberg cut", as well as a unified mathematical model including both quantum and classical physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-03T16:51:19Z) - Why we should interpret density matrices as moment matrices: the case of
(in)distinguishable particles and the emergence of classical reality [69.62715388742298]
We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs)
We will show that QT for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can be formulated in this way.
We will show that finitely exchangeable probabilities for a classical dice are as weird as QT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T14:47:39Z) - Fall of a Particle to the Center of a Singular Potential: Classical vs.
Quantum Exact Solutions [0.0]
We inspect the quantum problem with the help of the conventional Schr"odinger's equation.
Surprisingly, the quantum and classical solutions exhibit striking similarities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-25T11:04:39Z) - Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs.
We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables.
We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z) - External and internal wave functions: de Broglie's double-solution
theory? [77.34726150561087]
We propose an interpretative framework for quantum mechanics corresponding to the specifications of Louis de Broglie's double-solution theory.
The principle is to decompose the evolution of a quantum system into two wave functions.
For Schr"odinger, the particles are extended and the square of the module of the (internal) wave function of an electron corresponds to the density of its charge in space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-13T13:41:24Z) - Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it.
We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.