Mastering the exploration-exploitation trade-off in Bayesian Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08624v1
• Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 13:19:03 GMT
• Title: Mastering the exploration-exploitation trade-off in Bayesian Optimization
• Authors: Antonio Candelieri
• Abstract summary: The acquisition function drives the choice of the next solution to evaluate, balancing between exploration and exploitation. This paper proposes a novel acquisition function, mastering the trade-off between explorative and exploitative choices, adaptively.
• Score: 0.2538209532048867
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Gaussian Process based Bayesian Optimization is a well-known sample efficient sequential strategy for globally optimizing black-box, expensive, and multi-extremal functions. The role of the Gaussian Process is to provide a probabilistic approximation of the unknown function, depending on the sequentially collected observations, while an acquisition function drives the choice of the next solution to evaluate, balancing between exploration and exploitation, depending on the current Gaussian Process model. Despite the huge effort of the scientific community in defining effective exploration-exploitation mechanisms, we are still far away from the master acquisition function. This paper merges the most relevant results and insights from both algorithmic and human search strategies to propose a novel acquisition function, mastering the trade-off between explorative and exploitative choices, adaptively. We compare the proposed acquisition function on a number of test functions and against different state-of-the-art ones, which are instead based on prefixed or random scheduling between exploration and exploitation. A Pareto analysis is performed with respect to two (antagonistic) goals: convergence to the optimum and exploration capability. Results empirically prove that the proposed acquisition function is almost always Pareto optimal and also the most balanced trade-off between the two goals.

Related papers

• Batched Bayesian optimization with correlated candidate uncertainties [44.38372821900645]
  We propose an acquisition strategy for discrete optimization motivated by pure exploitation, qPO (multipoint of Optimality) We apply our method to the model-guided exploration of large chemical libraries and provide empirical evidence that it performs better than or on par with state-of-the-art methods in batched Bayesian optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T20:13:12Z)
• Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies [102.82152945324381]
  We consider a generalization of Shannon entropy from work in statistical decision theory. We first show that special cases of this entropy lead to popular acquisition functions used in BO procedures. We then show how alternative choices for the loss yield a flexible family of acquisition functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T04:43:58Z)
• On the development of a Bayesian optimisation framework for complex unknown systems [11.066706766632578]
  This paper studies and compares common Bayesian optimisation algorithms empirically on a range of synthetic test functions. It investigates the choice of acquisition function and number of training samples, exact calculation of acquisition functions and Monte Carlo based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T09:50:34Z)
• Surrogate modeling for Bayesian optimization beyond a single Gaussian process [62.294228304646516]
  We propose a novel Bayesian surrogate model to balance exploration with exploitation of the search space. To endow function sampling with scalability, random feature-based kernel approximation is leveraged per GP model. To further establish convergence of the proposed EGP-TS to the global optimum, analysis is conducted based on the notion of Bayesian regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T16:43:10Z)
• Efficient Neural Network Analysis with Sum-of-Infeasibilities [64.31536828511021]
  Inspired by sum-of-infeasibilities methods in convex optimization, we propose a novel procedure for analyzing verification queries on networks with extensive branching functions. An extension to a canonical case-analysis-based complete search procedure can be achieved by replacing the convex procedure executed at each search state with DeepSoI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T15:05:09Z)
• Efficient Exploration in Binary and Preferential Bayesian Optimization [0.5076419064097732]
  We show that it is important for BO algorithms to distinguish between different types of uncertainty. We propose several new acquisition functions that outperform state-of-the-art BO functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T14:44:34Z)
• Inverse Bayesian Optimization: Learning Human Search Strategies in a Sequential Optimization Task [0.10499611180329801]
  In this paper, we explore the inverse problem of Bayesian optimization. We estimate the agent's latent acquisition function based on observed search paths. We illustrate our methods by analyzing human behavior from an experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T15:40:34Z)
• Are we Forgetting about Compositional Optimisers in Bayesian Optimisation? [66.39551991177542]
  This paper presents a sample methodology for global optimisation. Within this, a crucial performance-determiningtrivial is maximising the acquisition function. We highlight the empirical advantages of the approach to optimise functionation across 3958 individual experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T12:18:38Z)
• Multi-agent Policy Optimization with Approximatively Synchronous Advantage Estimation [55.96893934962757]
  In multi-agent system, polices of different agents need to be evaluated jointly. In current methods, value functions or advantage functions use counter-factual joint actions which are evaluated asynchronously. In this work, we propose the approximatively synchronous advantage estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T07:29:19Z)
• Incorporating Expert Prior in Bayesian Optimisation via Space Warping [54.412024556499254]
  In big search spaces the algorithm goes through several low function value regions before reaching the optimum of the function. One approach to subside this cold start phase is to use prior knowledge that can accelerate the optimisation. In this paper, we represent the prior knowledge about the function optimum through a prior distribution. The prior distribution is then used to warp the search space in such a way that space gets expanded around the high probability region of function optimum and shrinks around low probability region of optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-27T06:18:49Z)
• Composition of kernel and acquisition functions for High Dimensional Bayesian Optimization [0.1749935196721634]
  We use the addition-ality of the objective function into mapping both the kernel and the acquisition function of the Bayesian Optimization. This ap-proach makes more efficient the learning/updating of the probabilistic surrogate model. Results are presented for real-life application, that is the control of pumps in urban water distribution systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:45:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.