Topological Interpretability for Deep-Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08642v2
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:41 GMT
• Title: Topological Interpretability for Deep-Learning
• Authors: Adam Spannaus, Heidi A. Hanson, Lynne Penberthy, Georgia Tourassi,
• Abstract summary: Deep learning (DL) models cannot quantify the certainty of their predictions. This work presents a method to infer prominent features in two DL classification models trained on clinical and non-clinical text.
• Score: 0.30806551485143496
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the growing adoption of AI-based systems across everyday life, the need to understand their decision-making mechanisms is correspondingly increasing. The level at which we can trust the statistical inferences made from AI-based decision systems is an increasing concern, especially in high-risk systems such as criminal justice or medical diagnosis, where incorrect inferences may have tragic consequences. Despite their successes in providing solutions to problems involving real-world data, deep learning (DL) models cannot quantify the certainty of their predictions. These models are frequently quite confident, even when their solutions are incorrect. This work presents a method to infer prominent features in two DL classification models trained on clinical and non-clinical text by employing techniques from topological and geometric data analysis. We create a graph of a model's feature space and cluster the inputs into the graph's vertices by the similarity of features and prediction statistics. We then extract subgraphs demonstrating high-predictive accuracy for a given label. These subgraphs contain a wealth of information about features that the DL model has recognized as relevant to its decisions. We infer these features for a given label using a distance metric between probability measures, and demonstrate the stability of our method compared to the LIME and SHAP interpretability methods. This work establishes that we may gain insights into the decision mechanism of a DL model. This method allows us to ascertain if the model is making its decisions based on information germane to the problem or identifies extraneous patterns within the data.

Related papers

• Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach [0.0]
  Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. We propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap) We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T16:04:35Z)
• Overlap Number of Balls Model-Agnostic CounterFactuals (ONB-MACF): A Data-Morphology-based Counterfactual Generation Method for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence [15.415120542032547]
  XAI seeks to make AI systems more understandable and trustworthy. This work analyses the value of data morphology strategies in generating counterfactual explanations. It introduces the Overlap Number of Balls Model-Agnostic CounterFactuals (ONB-MACF) method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T18:51:42Z)
• Unified Uncertainty Estimation for Cognitive Diagnosis Models [70.46998436898205]
  We propose a unified uncertainty estimation approach for a wide range of cognitive diagnosis models. We decompose the uncertainty of diagnostic parameters into data aspect and model aspect. Our method is effective and can provide useful insights into the uncertainty of cognitive diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T13:48:20Z)
• LaPLACE: Probabilistic Local Model-Agnostic Causal Explanations [1.0370398945228227]
  We introduce LaPLACE-explainer, designed to provide probabilistic cause-and-effect explanations for machine learning models. The LaPLACE-Explainer component leverages the concept of a Markov blanket to establish statistical boundaries between relevant and non-relevant features. Our approach offers causal explanations and outperforms LIME and SHAP in terms of local accuracy and consistency of explained features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T04:09:59Z)
• Explainable Machine Learning for Hydrocarbon Prospect Risking [14.221460375400692]
  We show how LIME can induce trust in model's decisions by revealing the decision-making process to be aligned to domain knowledge. It has the potential to debug mispredictions made due to anomalous patterns in the data or faulty training datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T00:38:14Z)
• Distributionally Robust Semi-Supervised Learning Over Graphs [68.29280230284712]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) over graph-structured data emerges in many network science applications. To efficiently manage learning over graphs, variants of graph neural networks (GNNs) have been developed recently. Despite their success in practice, most of existing methods are unable to handle graphs with uncertain nodal attributes. Challenges also arise due to distributional uncertainties associated with data acquired by noisy measurements. A distributionally robust learning framework is developed, where the objective is to train models that exhibit quantifiable robustness against perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T14:23:54Z)
• The Causal Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inference [125.57815987218756]
  An object called structural causal model (SCM) represents a collection of mechanisms and sources of random variation of the system under investigation. In this paper, we show that the causal hierarchy theorem (Thm. 1, Bareinboim et al., 2020) still holds for neural models. We introduce a special type of SCM called a neural causal model (NCM), and formalize a new type of inductive bias to encode structural constraints necessary for performing causal inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T01:55:18Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
  We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap. We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert. Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.