Overlap Number of Balls Model-Agnostic CounterFactuals (ONB-MACF): A Data-Morphology-based Counterfactual Generation Method for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12326v1
• Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:51:42 GMT
• Title: Overlap Number of Balls Model-Agnostic CounterFactuals (ONB-MACF): A Data-Morphology-based Counterfactual Generation Method for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: José Daniel Pascual-Triana, Alberto Fernández, Javier Del Ser, Francisco Herrera,
• Abstract summary: XAI seeks to make AI systems more understandable and trustworthy. This work analyses the value of data morphology strategies in generating counterfactual explanations. It introduces the Overlap Number of Balls Model-Agnostic CounterFactuals (ONB-MACF) method.
• Score: 15.415120542032547
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is a pivotal research domain aimed at understanding the operational mechanisms of AI systems, particularly those considered ``black boxes'' due to their complex, opaque nature. XAI seeks to make these AI systems more understandable and trustworthy, providing insight into their decision-making processes. By producing clear and comprehensible explanations, XAI enables users, practitioners, and stakeholders to trust a model's decisions. This work analyses the value of data morphology strategies in generating counterfactual explanations. It introduces the Overlap Number of Balls Model-Agnostic CounterFactuals (ONB-MACF) method, a model-agnostic counterfactual generator that leverages data morphology to estimate a model's decision boundaries. The ONB-MACF method constructs hyperspheres in the data space whose covered points share a class, mapping the decision boundary. Counterfactuals are then generated by incrementally adjusting an instance's attributes towards the nearest alternate-class hypersphere, crossing the decision boundary with minimal modifications. By design, the ONB-MACF method generates feasible and sparse counterfactuals that follow the data distribution. Our comprehensive benchmark from a double perspective (quantitative and qualitative) shows that the ONB-MACF method outperforms existing state-of-the-art counterfactual generation methods across multiple quality metrics on diverse tabular datasets. This supports our hypothesis, showcasing the potential of data-morphology-based explainability strategies for trustworthy AI.

Related papers

• SynthTree: Co-supervised Local Model Synthesis for Explainable Prediction [15.832975722301011]
  We propose a novel method to enhance explainability with minimal accuracy loss. We have developed novel methods for estimating nodes by leveraging AI techniques. Our findings highlight the critical role that statistical methodologies can play in advancing explainable AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:43:01Z)
• Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach [0.0]
  Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. We propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap) We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T16:04:35Z)
• Human Trajectory Forecasting with Explainable Behavioral Uncertainty [63.62824628085961]
  Human trajectory forecasting helps to understand and predict human behaviors, enabling applications from social robots to self-driving cars. Model-free methods offer superior prediction accuracy but lack explainability, while model-based methods provide explainability but cannot predict well. We show that BNSP-SFM achieves up to a 50% improvement in prediction accuracy, compared with 11 state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T16:45:21Z)
• CLIMAX: An exploration of Classifier-Based Contrastive Explanations [5.381004207943597]
  We propose a novel post-hoc model XAI technique that provides contrastive explanations justifying the classification of a black box. Our method, which we refer to as CLIMAX, is based on local classifiers. We show that we achieve better consistency as compared to baselines such as LIME, BayLIME, and SLIME.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-02T22:52:58Z)
• Topological Interpretability for Deep-Learning [0.30806551485143496]
  Deep learning (DL) models cannot quantify the certainty of their predictions. This work presents a method to infer prominent features in two DL classification models trained on clinical and non-clinical text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T13:38:13Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Shapelet-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Multivariate Time Series [0.9990687944474738]
  We develop a model agnostic multivariate time series (MTS) counterfactual explanation algorithm. We test our approach on a real-life solar flare prediction dataset and prove that our approach produces high-quality counterfactuals. In addition to being visually interpretable, our explanations are superior in terms of proximity, sparsity, and plausibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T17:33:31Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement [75.00655434905417]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is an emerging research field bringing transparency to highly complex machine learning (ML) models. This paper offers a comprehensive overview over techniques that apply XAI practically for improving various properties of ML models. We show empirically through experiments on toy and realistic settings how explanations can help improve properties such as model generalization ability or reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T15:44:28Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.