Counterfactual Debiasing for Generating Factually Consistent Text Summaries

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10736v1
• Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 06:15:45 GMT
• Title: Counterfactual Debiasing for Generating Factually Consistent Text Summaries
• Authors: Chenhe Dong, Yuexiang Xie, Yaliang Li, Ying Shen
• Abstract summary: We construct causal graphs for abstractive text summarization and identify the intrinsic causes of the factual inconsistency. We propose a debiasing framework, named CoFactSum, to alleviate the causal effects of these biases by counterfactual estimation. Experiments on two widely-used summarization datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of CoFactSum.
• Score: 46.88138136539263
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite substantial progress in abstractive text summarization to generate fluent and informative texts, the factual inconsistency in the generated summaries remains an important yet challenging problem to be solved. In this paper, we construct causal graphs for abstractive text summarization and identify the intrinsic causes of the factual inconsistency, i.e., the language bias and irrelevancy bias, and further propose a debiasing framework, named CoFactSum, to alleviate the causal effects of these biases by counterfactual estimation. Specifically, the proposed CoFactSum provides two counterfactual estimation strategies, i.e., Explicit Counterfactual Masking with an explicit dynamic masking strategy, and Implicit Counterfactual Training with an implicit discriminative cross-attention mechanism. Meanwhile, we design a Debiasing Degree Adjustment mechanism to dynamically adapt the debiasing degree at each decoding step. Extensive experiments on two widely-used summarization datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of CoFactSum in enhancing the factual consistency of generated summaries compared with several baselines.

Related papers

• AMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation [57.8363998797433]
  We propose AMRFact, a framework that generates perturbed summaries using Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) Our approach parses factually consistent summaries into AMR graphs and injects controlled factual inconsistencies to create negative examples, allowing for coherent factually inconsistent summaries to be generated with high error-type coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T02:56:29Z)
• Disentangled Representation Learning with Transmitted Information Bottleneck [57.22757813140418]
  We present textbfDisTIB (textbfTransmitted textbfInformation textbfBottleneck for textbfDisd representation learning), a novel objective that navigates the balance between information compression and preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T03:18:40Z)
• Interpretable Automatic Fine-grained Inconsistency Detection in Text Summarization [56.94741578760294]
  We propose the task of fine-grained inconsistency detection, the goal of which is to predict the fine-grained types of factual errors in a summary. Motivated by how humans inspect factual inconsistency in summaries, we propose an interpretable fine-grained inconsistency detection model, FineGrainFact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T22:11:47Z)
• Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual Consistency [14.974996886744083]
  We release SummFC, a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency. We argue that our dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarization systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T15:04:20Z)
• Factual Consistency Evaluation for Text Summarization via Counterfactual Estimation [42.63902468258758]
  We propose a novel metric to evaluate the factual consistency in text summarization via counterfactual estimation. We conduct a series of experiments on three public abstractive text summarization datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-30T11:48:41Z)
• The Factual Inconsistency Problem in Abstractive Text Summarization: A Survey [25.59111855107199]
  neural encoder-decoder models pioneered by Seq2Seq framework have been proposed to achieve the goal of generating more abstractive summaries. At a high level, such neural models can freely generate summaries without any constraint on the words or phrases used. However, the neural model's abstraction ability is a double-edged sword.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T08:46:13Z)
• Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization [98.27031108197944]
  Span-Fact is a suite of two factual correction models that leverages knowledge learned from question answering models to make corrections in system-generated summaries via span selection. Our models employ single or multi-masking strategies to either iteratively or auto-regressively replace entities in order to ensure semantic consistency w.r.t. the source text. Experiments show that our models significantly boost the factual consistency of system-generated summaries without sacrificing summary quality in terms of both automatic metrics and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T02:51:02Z)
• Enhancing Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization [57.67609672082137]
  We propose a fact-aware summarization model FASum to extract and integrate factual relations into the summary generation process. We then design a factual corrector model FC to automatically correct factual errors from summaries generated by existing systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T07:36:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.