Algorithmic failure as a humanities methodology: machine learning's mispredictions identify rich cases for qualitative analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11663v1
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 13:24:32 GMT
• Title: Algorithmic failure as a humanities methodology: machine learning's mispredictions identify rich cases for qualitative analysis
• Authors: Jill Walker Rettberg
• Abstract summary: I trained a simple machine learning algorithm to predict whether or not an action was active or passive using only information about fictional characters. The results thus support Munk et al.'s theory that failed predictions can be productively used to identify rich cases for qualitative analysis. Further research is needed to develop an understanding of what kinds of data the method is useful for and which kinds of machine learning are most generative.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This commentary tests a methodology proposed by Munk et al. (2022) for using failed predictions in machine learning as a method to identify ambiguous and rich cases for qualitative analysis. Using a dataset describing actions performed by fictional characters interacting with machine vision technologies in 500 artworks, movies, novels and videogames, I trained a simple machine learning algorithm (using the kNN algorithm in R) to predict whether or not an action was active or passive using only information about the fictional characters. Predictable actions were generally unemotional and unambiguous activities where machine vision technologies were treated as simple tools. Unpredictable actions, that is, actions that the algorithm could not correctly predict, were more ambivalent and emotionally loaded, with more complex power relationships between characters and technologies. The results thus support Munk et al.'s theory that failed predictions can be productively used to identify rich cases for qualitative analysis. This test goes beyond simply replicating Munk et al.'s results by demonstrating that the method can be applied to a broader humanities domain, and that it does not require complex neural networks but can also work with a simpler machine learning algorithm. Further research is needed to develop an understanding of what kinds of data the method is useful for and which kinds of machine learning are most generative. To support this, the R code required to produce the results is included so the test can be replicated. The code can also be reused or adapted to test the method on other datasets.

Related papers

• Offline Imitation Learning Through Graph Search and Retrieval [57.57306578140857]
  Imitation learning is a powerful machine learning algorithm for a robot to acquire manipulation skills. We propose GSR, a simple yet effective algorithm that learns from suboptimal demonstrations through Graph Search and Retrieval. GSR can achieve a 10% to 30% higher success rate and over 30% higher proficiency compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T06:12:21Z)
• Multiclass classification utilising an estimated algorithmic probability prior [0.5156484100374058]
  We study how algorithmic information theory, especially algorithmic probability, may aid in a machine learning task. This work is one of the first to demonstrate how algorithmic probability can aid in a concrete, real-world, machine learning problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T07:50:12Z)
• Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or Something Else? [93.91375268580806]
  Both politics and pandemics have recently provided ample motivation for the development of machine learning-enabled disinformation (a.k.a. fake news) detection algorithms. Existing literature has focused primarily on the fully-automated case, but the resulting techniques cannot reliably detect disinformation on the varied topics, sources, and time scales required for military applications. By leveraging an already-available analyst as a human-in-the-loop, canonical machine learning techniques of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and stance detection become plausible methods to use for a partially-automated disinformation detection system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T13:30:34Z)
• MURAL: Meta-Learning Uncertainty-Aware Rewards for Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning [65.52675802289775]
  We show that an uncertainty aware classifier can solve challenging reinforcement learning problems. We propose a novel method for computing the normalized maximum likelihood (NML) distribution. We show that the resulting algorithm has a number of intriguing connections to both count-based exploration methods and prior algorithms for learning reward functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T08:19:57Z)
• Intuitiveness in Active Teaching [7.8029610421817654]
  We analyze intuitiveness of certain algorithms when they are actively taught by users. We offer a systematic method to judge the efficacy of human-machine interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-25T09:31:56Z)
• Discovering Reinforcement Learning Algorithms [53.72358280495428]
  Reinforcement learning algorithms update an agent's parameters according to one of several possible rules. This paper introduces a new meta-learning approach that discovers an entire update rule. It includes both 'what to predict' (e.g. value functions) and 'how to learn from it' by interacting with a set of environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T07:38:39Z)
• On the Robustness of Active Learning [0.7340017786387767]
  Active Learning is concerned with how to identify the most useful samples for a Machine Learning algorithm to be trained with. We find that it is often applied with not enough care and domain knowledge. We propose the new "Sum of Squared Logits" method based on the Simpson diversity index and investigate the effect of using the confusion matrix for balancing in sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T09:07:23Z)
• An analysis on the use of autoencoders for representation learning: fundamentals, learning task case studies, explainability and challenges [11.329636084818778]
  In many machine learning tasks, learning a good representation of the data can be the key to building a well-performant solution. We present a series of learning tasks: data embedding for visualization, image denoising, semantic hashing, detection of abnormal behaviors and instance generation. A solution is proposed for each task employing autoencoders as the only learning method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T08:41:57Z)
• Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need? [72.00712736992618]
  We show that a simple baseline: learning a supervised or self-supervised representation on the meta-training set, outperforms state-of-the-art few-shot learning methods. An additional boost can be achieved through the use of self-distillation. We believe that our findings motivate a rethinking of few-shot image classification benchmarks and the associated role of meta-learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T17:58:42Z)
• AutoML-Zero: Evolving Machine Learning Algorithms From Scratch [76.83052807776276]
  We show that it is possible to automatically discover complete machine learning algorithms just using basic mathematical operations as building blocks. We demonstrate this by introducing a novel framework that significantly reduces human bias through a generic search space. We believe these preliminary successes in discovering machine learning algorithms from scratch indicate a promising new direction in the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-06T19:00:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.