GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or BARD? Evaluating LLMs Reasoning Ability in Zero-Shot Setting and Performance Boosting Through Prompts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.12477v2
• Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:34:51 GMT
• Title: GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or BARD? Evaluating LLMs Reasoning Ability in Zero-Shot Setting and Performance Boosting Through Prompts
• Authors: Jessica L\'opez Espejel, El Hassane Ettifouri, Mahaman Sanoussi Yahaya Alassan, El Mehdi Chouham, Walid Dahhane
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance on various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. In this paper, we examine the performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and BARD models, by performing a thorough technical evaluation on different reasoning tasks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance on various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, there is a current hot debate regarding their reasoning capacity. In this paper, we examine the performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and BARD models, by performing a thorough technical evaluation on different reasoning tasks across eleven distinct datasets. Our paper provides empirical evidence showcasing the superior performance of ChatGPT-4 in comparison to both ChatGPT-3.5 and BARD in zero-shot setting throughout almost all evaluated tasks. While the superiority of GPT-4 compared to GPT-3.5 might be explained by its larger size and NLP efficiency, this was not evident for BARD. We also demonstrate that the three models show limited proficiency in Inductive, Mathematical, and Multi-hop Reasoning Tasks. To bolster our findings, we present a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the results from these three models. Furthermore, we propose a set of engineered prompts that enhances the zero-shot setting performance of all three models.

Related papers

• Large language models for aspect-based sentiment analysis [0.0]
  We assess the performance of GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 in zero shot, few shot and fine-tuned settings. Fine-tuned GPT-3.5 achieves a state-of-the-art F1 score of 83.8 on the joint aspect term extraction and polarity classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T10:03:21Z)
• GLoRE: Evaluating Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models [29.914546407784552]
  We introduce GLoRE, a benchmark comprised of 12 datasets that span three different types of tasks. ChatGPT and GPT-4 show a strong capability of logical reasoning, with GPT-4 surpassing ChatGPT by a large margin. We propose a self-consistency probing method to enhance the accuracy of ChatGPT and a fine-tuned method to boost the performance of an open LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T13:52:15Z)
• Taqyim: Evaluating Arabic NLP Tasks Using ChatGPT Models [6.145834902689888]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on various downstream tasks without requiring fine-tuning. Despite having a lower training proportion compared to English, these models also exhibit remarkable capabilities in other languages. In this study, we assess the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models on seven distinct Arabic NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T15:54:29Z)
• InheritSumm: A General, Versatile and Compact Summarizer by Distilling from GPT [75.29359361404073]
  InheritSumm is a versatile and compact summarization model derived from GPT-3.5 through distillation. It achieves similar or superior performance to GPT-3.5 in zeroshot and fewshot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T14:52:32Z)
• Exploring the Trade-Offs: Unified Large Language Models vs Local Fine-Tuned Models for Highly-Specific Radiology NLI Task [49.50140712943701]
  We evaluate the performance of ChatGPT/GPT-4 on a radiology NLI task and compare it to other models fine-tuned specifically on task-related data samples. We also conduct a comprehensive investigation on ChatGPT/GPT-4's reasoning ability by introducing varying levels of inference difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T17:21:48Z)
• Analyzing the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Grammatical Error Correction [28.58384091374763]
  GPT-3 and GPT-4 models are powerful, achieving high performance on a variety of Natural Language Processing tasks. We perform experiments testing the capabilities of a GPT-3.5 model (text-davinci-003) and a GPT-4 model (gpt-4-0314) on major GEC benchmarks. We report the performance of our best prompt on the BEA-2019 and JFLEG datasets, finding that the GPT models can perform well in a sentence-level revision setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T03:08:49Z)
• A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Models [71.42197262495056]
  GPT series models have gained considerable attention due to their exceptional natural language processing capabilities. We select six representative models, comprising two GPT-3 series models and four GPT-3.5 series models. We evaluate their performance on nine natural language understanding (NLU) tasks using 21 datasets. Our experiments reveal that the overall ability of GPT series models on NLU tasks does not increase gradually as the models evolve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T14:02:04Z)
• GPT-4 Technical Report [116.90398195245983]
  GPT-4 is a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. It exhibits human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, including passing a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T17:15:04Z)
• How Robust is GPT-3.5 to Predecessors? A Comprehensive Study on Language Understanding Tasks [65.7949334650854]
  GPT-3.5 models have demonstrated impressive performance in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, their robustness and abilities to handle various complexities of the open world have yet to be explored. We show that GPT-3.5 faces some specific robustness challenges, including instability, prompt sensitivity, and number sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T07:39:01Z)
• News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3 [73.48220043216087]
  We study how GPT-3 compares against fine-tuned models trained on large summarization datasets. We show that not only do humans overwhelmingly prefer GPT-3 summaries, prompted using only a task description, but these also do not suffer from common dataset-specific issues such as poor factuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T01:04:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.