GLoRE: Evaluating Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09107v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:52:15 GMT
• Title: GLoRE: Evaluating Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models
• Authors: Hanmeng liu, Zhiyang Teng, Ruoxi Ning, Jian Liu, Qiji Zhou, Yue Zhang
• Abstract summary: We introduce GLoRE, a benchmark comprised of 12 datasets that span three different types of tasks. ChatGPT and GPT-4 show a strong capability of logical reasoning, with GPT-4 surpassing ChatGPT by a large margin. We propose a self-consistency probing method to enhance the accuracy of ChatGPT and a fine-tuned method to boost the performance of an open LLM.
• Score: 29.914546407784552
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, large language models (LLMs), including notable models such as GPT-4 and burgeoning community models, have showcased significant general language understanding abilities. However, there has been a scarcity of attempts to assess the logical reasoning capacities of these LLMs, an essential facet of natural language understanding. To encourage further investigation in this area, we introduce GLoRE, a meticulously assembled General Logical Reasoning Evaluation benchmark comprised of 12 datasets that span three different types of tasks. Our experimental results show that compared to the performance of human and supervised fine-tuning, the logical reasoning capabilities of open LLM models necessitate additional improvement; ChatGPT and GPT-4 show a strong capability of logical reasoning, with GPT-4 surpassing ChatGPT by a large margin. We propose a self-consistency probing method to enhance the accuracy of ChatGPT and a fine-tuned method to boost the performance of an open LLM. We release the datasets and evaluation programs to facilitate future research.

Related papers

• OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
  This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs) We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization. OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• Using (Not so) Large Language Models for Generating Simulation Models in a Formal DSL -- A Study on Reaction Networks [0.0]
  We evaluate how a Large Language Model might be used for formalizing natural language into simulation models. We develop a synthetic data generator to serve as the basis for fine-tuning and evaluation. Our evaluation shows that our fine-tuned Mistral model can recover the ground truth simulation model in up to 84.5% of cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T15:48:01Z)
• A Statistical Framework for Ranking LLM-Based Chatbots [57.59268154690763]
  We propose a statistical framework that incorporates key advancements to address specific challenges in pairwise comparison analysis. First, we introduce a factored tie model that enhances the ability to handle groupings of human-judged comparisons. Second, we extend the framework to model covariance tiers between competitors, enabling deeper insights into performance relationships. Third, we resolve optimization challenges arising from parameter non-uniqueness by introducing novel constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T12:54:19Z)
• Small Language Models are Good Too: An Empirical Study of Zero-Shot Classification [4.4467858321751015]
  We benchmark language models from 77M to 40B parameters using different architectures and scoring functions. Our findings reveal that small models can effectively classify texts, getting on par with or surpassing their larger counterparts. This research underscores the notion that bigger isn't always better, suggesting that resource-efficient small models may offer viable solutions for specific data classification challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T07:10:28Z)
• A Large-Scale Evaluation of Speech Foundation Models [110.95827399522204]
  We establish the Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark (SUPERB) to study the effectiveness of the foundation model paradigm for speech. We propose a unified multi-tasking framework to address speech processing tasks in SUPERB using a frozen foundation model followed by task-specialized, lightweight prediction heads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T00:03:16Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structures [136.48389510481758]
  We introduce SELF-DISCOVER, a framework for self-discovering task-intrinsic reasoning structures. SELF-DISCOVER substantially improves GPT-4 and PaLM 2's performance on challenging reasoning benchmarks. We show that the self-discovered reasoning structures are universally applicable across model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T01:13:53Z)
• LogicAsker: Evaluating and Improving the Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models [63.14196038655506]
  We introduce LogicAsker, a novel approach for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) Our methodology reveals significant gaps in LLMs' learning of logical rules, with identified reasoning failures ranging from 29% to 90% across different models. We leverage these findings to construct targeted demonstration examples and fine-tune data, notably enhancing logical reasoning in models like GPT-4o by up to 5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T13:53:53Z)
• GPT-4 Surpassing Human Performance in Linguistic Pragmatics [0.0]
  This study investigates the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to comprehend and interpret linguistic pragmatics. Using Grice's communication principles, LLMs and human subjects were evaluated based on their responses to various dialogue-based tasks. The findings revealed the superior performance and speed of LLMs, particularly GPT4, over human subjects in interpreting pragmatics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T05:40:15Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4 [4.206175795966694]
  Large language models (LLMs) are a special class of pretrained language models obtained by scaling model size, pretraining corpus and computation. We refer to GPT-3 and its successor OpenAI models, including ChatGPT and GPT4, as GPT-3 family large language models (GLLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T16:37:05Z)
• Metacognitive Prompting Improves Understanding in Large Language Models [12.112914393948415]
  We introduce Metacognitive Prompting (MP), a strategy inspired by human introspective reasoning processes. We conduct experiments on four prevalent Large Language Models (LLMs) across ten natural language understanding (NLU) datasets. MP consistently outperforms existing prompting methods in both general and domain-specific NLU tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T05:10:17Z)
• Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Tasks [79.17291002710517]
  Despite the success of ChatGPT, its performances on most NLP tasks are still well below the supervised baselines. In this work, we looked into the causes, and discovered that its subpar performance was caused by the following factors. We propose a collection of general modules to address these issues, in an attempt to push the limits of ChatGPT on NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T09:40:05Z)
• Reimagining Retrieval Augmented Language Models for Answering Queries [23.373952699385427]
  We present a reality check on large language models and inspect the promise of retrieval augmented language models in comparison. Such language models are semi-parametric, where models integrate model parameters and knowledge from external data sources to make their predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T18:08:51Z)
• Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance [35.38549845444575]
  Chain-of-Thought Hub is an open-source evaluation suite on the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models. This work proposes Chain-of-Thought Hub, an open-source evaluation suite on the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T23:46:42Z)
• Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Models [59.227222647741094]
  In this paper, we make the first attempt to investigate the feasibility of incorporating logical knowledge through self-supervised post-training. We devise an auto-regressive objective variant of MERIt and integrate it with two LLM series, i.e., FLAN-T5 and LLaMA, with parameter size ranging from 3 billion to 13 billion. The results on two challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of LogicLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T06:13:10Z)
• Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents [56.104476412839944]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot generalization across various language-related tasks. This paper investigates generative LLMs for relevance ranking in Information Retrieval (IR) To address concerns about data contamination of LLMs, we collect a new test set called NovelEval. To improve efficiency in real-world applications, we delve into the potential for distilling the ranking capabilities of ChatGPT into small specialized models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T10:16:03Z)
• Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language Models [91.03359121149595]
  Large language models (LLMs) can produce coherent, cohesive, relevant, and fluent answers for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This paper provides an in-depth evaluation of LLMs' ability on discourse modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T03:49:06Z)
• Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher [83.98181046650664]
  We present an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance across a wide range of model scales. Gains from scale are largest in areas such as reading comprehension, fact-checking, and the identification of toxic language. We discuss the application of language models to AI safety and the mitigation of downstream harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T19:41:47Z)
• A Systematic Investigation of Commonsense Understanding in Large Language Models [23.430757316504316]
  Large language models have shown impressive performance on many natural language processing (NLP) tasks in a zero-shot setting. We ask whether these models exhibit commonsense understanding by evaluating models against four commonsense benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T22:20:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.