Exploring Representational Disparities Between Multilingual and Bilingual Translation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14230v2
• Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:16:37 GMT
• Title: Exploring Representational Disparities Between Multilingual and Bilingual Translation Models
• Authors: Neha Verma, Kenton Murray, Kevin Duh,
• Abstract summary: Some language pairs in multilingual models can see worse performance than in bilingual models, especially in the one-to-many translation setting. We show that for a given language pair, its multilingual model decoder representations are consistently less isotropic and occupy fewer dimensions than comparable bilingual model decoder representations.
• Score: 16.746335565636976
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multilingual machine translation has proven immensely useful for both parameter efficiency and overall performance across many language pairs via complete multilingual parameter sharing. However, some language pairs in multilingual models can see worse performance than in bilingual models, especially in the one-to-many translation setting. Motivated by their empirical differences, we examine the geometric differences in representations from bilingual models versus those from one-to-many multilingual models. Specifically, we compute the isotropy of these representations using intrinsic dimensionality and IsoScore, in order to measure how the representations utilize the dimensions in their underlying vector space. Using the same evaluation data in both models, we find that for a given language pair, its multilingual model decoder representations are consistently less isotropic and occupy fewer dimensions than comparable bilingual model decoder representations. Additionally, we show that much of the anisotropy in multilingual decoder representations can be attributed to modeling language-specific information, therefore limiting remaining representational capacity.

Related papers

• The Less the Merrier? Investigating Language Representation in Multilingual Models [8.632506864465501]
  We investigate the linguistic representation of different languages in multilingual models. We observe from our experiments that community-centered models perform better at distinguishing between languages in the same family for low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T02:26:34Z)
• Exploring Anisotropy and Outliers in Multilingual Language Models for Cross-Lingual Semantic Sentence Similarity [64.18762301574954]
  Previous work has shown that the representations output by contextual language models are more anisotropic than static type embeddings. This seems to be true for both monolingual and multilingual models, although much less work has been done on the multilingual context. We investigate outlier dimensions and their relationship to anisotropy in multiple pre-trained multilingual language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T09:01:48Z)
• Breaking Down Multilingual Machine Translation [74.24795388967907]
  We show that multilingual training is beneficial to encoders in general, while it only benefits decoders for low-resource languages (LRLs) Our many-to-one models for high-resource languages and one-to-many models for LRLs outperform the best results reported by Aharoni et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T14:57:12Z)
• Discovering Representation Sprachbund For Multilingual Pre-Training [139.05668687865688]
  We generate language representation from multilingual pre-trained models and conduct linguistic analysis. We cluster all the target languages into multiple groups and name each group as a representation sprachbund. Experiments are conducted on cross-lingual benchmarks and significant improvements are achieved compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T09:32:06Z)
• Are Multilingual Models Effective in Code-Switching? [57.78477547424949]
  We study the effectiveness of multilingual language models to understand their capability and adaptability to the mixed-language setting. Our findings suggest that pre-trained multilingual models do not necessarily guarantee high-quality representations on code-switching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T16:20:02Z)
• How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Models [96.32118305166412]
  We study a set of nine typologically diverse languages with readily available pretrained monolingual models on a set of five diverse monolingual downstream tasks. We find that languages which are adequately represented in the multilingual model's vocabulary exhibit negligible performance decreases over their monolingual counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-31T14:11:00Z)
• Cross-neutralising: Probing for joint encoding of linguistic information in multilingual models [17.404220737977738]
  We study how relationships between languages are encoded in two state-of-the-art multilingual models. The results suggest that linguistic properties are encoded jointly across typologically-similar languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T07:55:32Z)
• Learning to Scale Multilingual Representations for Vision-Language Tasks [51.27839182889422]
  The effectiveness of SMALR is demonstrated with ten diverse languages, over twice the number supported in vision-language tasks to date. We evaluate on multilingual image-sentence retrieval and outperform prior work by 3-4% with less than 1/5th the training parameters compared to other word embedding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T01:03:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.