Pro-f-quiz: increasing the PROductivity of Feedback through activating
QUIZzes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15996v1
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:37:40 GMT
- Title: Pro-f-quiz: increasing the PROductivity of Feedback through activating
QUIZzes
- Authors: Kris Aerts, Wouter Groeneveld
- Abstract summary: We have set up an experiment, titled Pro-f-quiz, in which over two years 236 students participated and in which the feedback is communicated through an online quiz.
The results show that approximately 85% of the students appreciate the approach with 60% indicating that they reflect more intensively about their work than when the feedback is transmitted traditionally.
- Score: 3.5788754401889022
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Feedback beyond the grade is an important part of the learning process.
However, because of the large student groups, many teachers in higher education
are faced with practicalities such as the limited time to prepare and
communicate the feedback to individual students. We have set up an experiment,
titled Pro-f-quiz, in which over two years 236 students participated and in
which the feedback is communicated through an online quiz that activates the
students to reflect upon their solution. The system can be set up in a very
limited time compared to booking individual time slots. The results show that
approximately 85% of the students appreciate the approach with 60% indicating
that they reflect more intensively about their work than when the feedback is
transmitted traditionally. Moreover, the grade of the students participating in
the project was substantially higher than students not participating.
Related papers
- Enhancing Students' Learning Process Through Self-Generated Tests [0.0]
This paper describes an educational experiment aimed at the promotion of students' autonomous learning.
The main idea is to make the student feel part of the evaluation process by including students' questions in the evaluation exams.
Questions uploaded by students are visible to every enrolled student as well as to each involved teacher.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T09:49:33Z) - YODA: Teacher-Student Progressive Learning for Language Models [82.0172215948963]
This paper introduces YODA, a teacher-student progressive learning framework.
It emulates the teacher-student education process to improve the efficacy of model fine-tuning.
Experiments show that training LLaMA2 with data from YODA improves SFT with significant performance gain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T14:32:15Z) - Using Assignment Incentives to Reduce Student Procrastination and
Encourage Code Review Interactions [2.1684358357001465]
This work presents an incentive system encouraging students to complete assignments many days before deadlines.
Completed assignments are code reviewed by staff for correctness and providing feedback, which results in more student-instructor interactions.
The incentives result in a change in student behavior with 45% of assignments completed early and 30% up to 4 days before the deadline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-25T22:17:40Z) - Scalable Two-Minute Feedback: Digital, Lecture-Accompanying Survey as a Continuous Feedback Instrument [0.0]
Detailed feedback on courses and lecture content is essential for their improvement and also serves as a tool for reflection.
The article used a digital survey format as formative feedback which attempts to measure student stress in a quantitative part and to address the participants' reflection in a qualitative part.
The results show a low, but constant rate of feedback. Responses mostly cover topics of the lecture content or organizational aspects and were intensively used to report issues within the lecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T08:14:26Z) - Does Starting Deep Learning Homework Earlier Improve Grades? [63.20583929886827]
Students who start a homework assignment earlier and spend more time on it should receive better grades on the assignment.
Existing literature on the impact of time spent on homework is not clear-cut and comes mostly from K-12 education.
We develop a hierarchical Bayesian model to help make principled conclusions about the impact on student success.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T09:34:30Z) - PapagAI:Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays [48.4434976446053]
We present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system.
The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T11:05:51Z) - Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognition with Adaptive Teacher
Learning and Fine-grained Student Ensemble [56.705249154629264]
Self-training teacher-student frameworks are proposed to improve the robustness of NER models.
In this paper, we propose an adaptive teacher learning comprised of two teacher-student networks.
Fine-grained student ensemble updates each fragment of the teacher model with a temporal moving average of the corresponding fragment of the student, which enhances consistent predictions on each model fragment against noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T12:14:09Z) - Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through
collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities.
We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA.
Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z) - The Study of Peer Assessment Impact on Group Learning Activities [2.045495982086173]
This research work provides a complete and systematic review, increase the practice and quality of the peer assessment process.
The results show 37% student will choose individual work over group work if given the choice.
In the case study, 82.1% of the total of 28 students have en-joyed working in a group using Facebook as communication tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-07T06:54:18Z) - A literature survey on student feedback assessment tools and their usage
in sentiment analysis [0.0]
We evaluate the effectiveness of various in-class feedback assessment methods such as Kahoot!, Mentimeter, Padlet, and polling.
We propose a sentiment analysis model for extracting the explicit suggestions from the students' qualitative feedback comments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-09T06:56:30Z) - The Challenges of Assessing and Evaluating the Students at Distance [77.34726150561087]
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a strong effect on higher education institutions with the closure of classroom teaching activities.
This short essay aims to explore the challenges posed to Portuguese higher education institutions and to analyze the challenges posed to evaluation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-30T13:13:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.