Strategic Data Sharing between Competitors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16052v3
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:16:02 GMT
- Title: Strategic Data Sharing between Competitors
- Authors: Nikita Tsoy and Nikola Konstantinov
- Abstract summary: We introduce a general framework for analyzing this data-sharing trade-off.
We study an instantiation of the framework, based on a conventional market model from economic theory.
Our findings indicate a profound impact of market conditions on the data-sharing incentives.
- Score: 4.8951183832371
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Collaborative learning techniques have significantly advanced in recent
years, enabling private model training across multiple organizations. Despite
this opportunity, firms face a dilemma when considering data sharing with
competitors -- while collaboration can improve a company's machine learning
model, it may also benefit competitors and hence reduce profits. In this work,
we introduce a general framework for analyzing this data-sharing trade-off. The
framework consists of three components, representing the firms' production
decisions, the effect of additional data on model quality, and the data-sharing
negotiation process, respectively. We then study an instantiation of the
framework, based on a conventional market model from economic theory, to
identify key factors that affect collaboration incentives. Our findings
indicate a profound impact of market conditions on the data-sharing incentives.
In particular, we find that reduced competition, in terms of the similarities
between the firms' products, and harder learning tasks foster collaboration.
Related papers
- Convergence-aware Clustered Federated Graph Learning Framework for Collaborative Inter-company Labor Market Forecasting [38.13767335441753]
Labor market forecasting on talent demand and supply is essential for business management and economic development.
Previous studies ignore the interconnection between demand-supply sequences among different companies for predicting variations.
We propose a Meta-personalized Convergence-aware Clustered Federated Learning framework to provide accurate and timely collaborative talent demand and supply prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-29T04:11:23Z) - Defection-Free Collaboration between Competitors in a Learning System [61.22540496065961]
We study collaborative learning systems in which the participants are competitors who will defect from the system if they lose revenue by collaborating.
We propose a more equitable, *defection-free* scheme in which both firms share with each other while losing no revenue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-22T17:29:45Z) - Balancing Similarity and Complementarity for Federated Learning [91.65503655796603]
Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly important in mobile and IoT systems.
One key challenge in FL is managing statistical heterogeneity, such as non-i.i.d. data.
We introduce a novel framework, textttFedSaC, which balances similarity and complementarity in FL cooperation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T08:16:19Z) - Collaborative Active Learning in Conditional Trust Environment [1.3846014191157405]
We investigate collaborative active learning, a paradigm in which multiple collaborators explore a new domain by leveraging their combined machine learning capabilities without disclosing their existing data and models.
This collaboration offers several advantages: (a) it addresses privacy and security concerns by eliminating the need for direct model and data disclosure; (b) it enables the use of different data sources and insights without direct data exchange; and (c) it promotes cost-effectiveness and resource efficiency through shared labeling costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T10:40:27Z) - Incentivizing Honesty among Competitors in Collaborative Learning and
Optimization [5.4619385369457225]
Collaborative learning techniques have the potential to enable machine learning models that are superior to models trained on a single entity's data.
In many cases, potential participants in such collaborative schemes are competitors on a downstream task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T17:28:41Z) - FedDM: Iterative Distribution Matching for Communication-Efficient
Federated Learning [87.08902493524556]
Federated learning(FL) has recently attracted increasing attention from academia and industry.
We propose FedDM to build the global training objective from multiple local surrogate functions.
In detail, we construct synthetic sets of data on each client to locally match the loss landscape from original data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T04:55:18Z) - Data Sharing Markets [95.13209326119153]
We study a setup where each agent can be both buyer and seller of data.
We consider two cases: bilateral data exchange (trading data with data) and unilateral data exchange (trading data with money)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-19T06:00:34Z) - Predicting Individual Treatment Effects of Large-scale Team Competitions
in a Ride-sharing Economy [47.47879093076968]
We analyze data collected from more than 500 large-scale team competitions organized by a leading ride-sharing platform.
Through a careful investigation of features and predictors, we are able to reduce out-sample prediction error by more than 24%.
A simulated analysis shows that by simply changing a few contest design options, the average treatment effect of a real competition is expected to increase by as much as 26%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-07T22:01:50Z) - Modeling Stakeholder-centric Value Chain of Data to Understand Data
Exchange Ecosystem [0.12891210250935145]
We propose a model describing the stakeholder-centric value chain (SVC) of data by focusing on the relationships among stakeholders in data businesses.
The SVC model enables the analysis and understanding of the structural characteristics of the data exchange ecosystem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-22T05:04:08Z) - Federated Residual Learning [53.77128418049985]
We study a new form of federated learning where the clients train personalized local models and make predictions jointly with the server-side shared model.
Using this new federated learning framework, the complexity of the central shared model can be minimized while still gaining all the performance benefits that joint training provides.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-28T19:55:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.