A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17139v3
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:06:33 GMT
- Title: A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality
- Authors: Junhyung Park, Simon Buchholz, Bernhard Schölkopf, Krikamol Muandet,
- Abstract summary: We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality.
Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
- Score: 55.6970314129444
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Causality is a central concept in a wide range of research areas, yet there is still no universally agreed axiomatisation of causality. We view causality both as an extension of probability theory and as a study of \textit{what happens when one intervenes on a system}, and argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. To that end, we propose the notion of a \textit{causal space}, consisting of a probability space along with a collection of transition probability kernels, called \textit{causal kernels}, that encode the causal information of the space. Our proposed framework is not only rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks including, for example, cycles, latent variables and stochastic processes.
Related papers
- Decoherence and Probability [0.0]
Non-probabilistic accounts of the emergence of probability via decoherence are unconvincing.
An alternative account of the emergence of probability involves the combination of textitquasi-probabilistic emergence, via a partially interpreted decoherence model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T08:16:09Z) - Anomalous symmetry protected blockade of skin effect in one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattice systems [20.4728241808175]
We present a theorem which shows that the combined spatial reflection symmetry can be considered as a criterion in one-dimensional non-Hermitian systems.
Our results reveal a profound connection between the symmetry and the fate of NHSE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T07:57:59Z) - Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories.
We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z) - Betting on what is neither verifiable nor falsifiable [18.688474183114085]
We propose an approach to betting on such events via options, or equivalently as bets on the outcome of a "verification-falsification game"
Our work thus acts as an alternative to the existing framework of Garrabrant induction for logical uncertainty, and relates to the stance known as constructivism in the philosophy of mathematics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:30:34Z) - What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean? [0.0]
We argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal.
We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-06T17:13:31Z) - The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence.
Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations.
A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z) - Relative Probability on Finite Outcome Spaces: A Systematic Examination
of its Axiomatization, Properties, and Applications [0.0]
This work proposes a view of probability as a relative measure rather than an absolute one.
We focus on finite outcome spaces and develop three fundamental axioms that establish requirements for relative probability functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-30T05:16:57Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - A Topological Perspective on Causal Inference [10.965065178451104]
We show that substantive assumption-free causal inference is possible only in a meager set of structural causal models.
Our results show that inductive assumptions sufficient to license valid causal inferences are statistically unverifiable in principle.
An additional benefit of our topological approach is that it easily accommodates SCMs with infinitely many variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-18T23:09:03Z) - Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an
Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles.
We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links.
This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.