Assessing Word Importance Using Models Trained for Semantic Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19689v1
• Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 09:34:26 GMT
• Title: Assessing Word Importance Using Models Trained for Semantic Tasks
• Authors: D\'avid Javorsk\'y, Ond\v{r}ej Bojar, Fran\c{c}ois Yvon
• Abstract summary: We derive word significance from models trained to solve semantic task: Natural Language Inference and Paraphrase Identification. We evaluate their relevance using a so-called cross-task evaluation. Our method can be used to identify important words in sentences without any explicit word importance labeling in training.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many NLP tasks require to automatically identify the most significant words in a text. In this work, we derive word significance from models trained to solve semantic task: Natural Language Inference and Paraphrase Identification. Using an attribution method aimed to explain the predictions of these models, we derive importance scores for each input token. We evaluate their relevance using a so-called cross-task evaluation: Analyzing the performance of one model on an input masked according to the other model's weight, we show that our method is robust with respect to the choice of the initial task. Additionally, we investigate the scores from the syntax point of view and observe interesting patterns, e.g. words closer to the root of a syntactic tree receive higher importance scores. Altogether, these observations suggest that our method can be used to identify important words in sentences without any explicit word importance labeling in training.

Related papers

• CompoundPiece: Evaluating and Improving Decompounding Performance of Language Models [77.45934004406283]
  We systematically study decompounding, the task of splitting compound words into their constituents. We introduce a dataset of 255k compound and non-compound words across 56 diverse languages obtained from Wiktionary. We introduce a novel methodology to train dedicated models for decompounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:32:27Z)
• Topics in the Haystack: Extracting and Evaluating Topics beyond Coherence [0.0]
  We propose a method that incorporates a deeper understanding of both sentence and document themes. This allows our model to detect latent topics that may include uncommon words or neologisms. We present correlation coefficients with human identification of intruder words and achieve near-human level results at the word-intrusion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T12:24:25Z)
• Effective Cross-Task Transfer Learning for Explainable Natural Language Inference with T5 [50.574918785575655]
  We compare sequential fine-tuning with a model for multi-task learning in the context of boosting performance on two tasks. Our results show that while sequential multi-task learning can be tuned to be good at the first of two target tasks, it performs less well on the second and additionally struggles with overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T13:26:08Z)
• Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methods [6.018950511093273]
  Saliency maps can explain a neural model's predictions by identifying important input features. We formalize the underexplored task of translating saliency maps into natural language. We compare two novel methods (search-based and instruction-based verbalizations) against conventional feature importance representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:48:15Z)
• Exploiting Word Semantics to Enrich Character Representations of Chinese Pre-trained Models [12.0190584907439]
  We propose a new method to exploit word structure and integrate lexical semantics into character representations of pre-trained models. We show that our approach achieves superior performance over the basic pre-trained models BERT, BERT-wwm and ERNIE on different Chinese NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T02:28:08Z)
• Improving Multi-task Generalization Ability for Neural Text Matching via Prompt Learning [54.66399120084227]
  Recent state-of-the-art neural text matching models (PLMs) are hard to generalize to different tasks. We adopt a specialization-generalization training strategy and refer to it as Match-Prompt. In specialization stage, descriptions of different matching tasks are mapped to only a few prompt tokens. In generalization stage, text matching model explores the essential matching signals by being trained on diverse multiple matching tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T11:01:08Z)
• Importance Estimation from Multiple Perspectives for Keyphrase Extraction [34.51718374923614]
  We propose a new approach to estimate the importance of keyphrase from multiple perspectives (called as textitKIEMP) textitKIEMP estimates the importance of phrase with three modules: a chunking module to measure its syntactic accuracy, a ranking module to check its information saliency, and a matching module to judge the concept consistency between phrase and the whole document. Experimental results on six benchmark datasets show that textitKIEMP outperforms the existing state-of-the-art keyphrase extraction approaches in most cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T05:48:22Z)
• Understanding Synonymous Referring Expressions via Contrastive Features [105.36814858748285]
  We develop an end-to-end trainable framework to learn contrastive features on the image and object instance levels. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the proposed algorithm on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T17:56:24Z)
• Prototypical Representation Learning for Relation Extraction [56.501332067073065]
  This paper aims to learn predictive, interpretable, and robust relation representations from distantly-labeled data. We learn prototypes for each relation from contextual information to best explore the intrinsic semantics of relations. Results on several relation learning tasks show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state-of-the-art relational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T08:11:43Z)
• Words aren't enough, their order matters: On the Robustness of Grounding Visual Referring Expressions [87.33156149634392]
  We critically examine RefCOg, a standard benchmark for visual referring expression recognition. We show that 83.7% of test instances do not require reasoning on linguistic structure. We propose two methods, one based on contrastive learning and the other based on multi-task learning, to increase the robustness of ViLBERT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T17:09:15Z)
• Corpus-level and Concept-based Explanations for Interpretable Document Classification [23.194220621342254]
  We propose a corpus-level explanation approach to capture causal relationships between keywords and model predictions. We also propose a concept-based explanation method that can automatically learn higher-level concepts and their importance to model prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T20:54:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.