FedCSD: A Federated Learning Based Approach for Code-Smell Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00038v3
• Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:07:30 GMT
• Title: FedCSD: A Federated Learning Based Approach for Code-Smell Detection
• Authors: Sadi Alawadi, Khalid Alkharabsheh, Fahed Alkhabbas, Victor Kebande, Feras M. Awaysheh, Fabio Palomba, Mohammed Awad,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a Federated Learning Code Smell Detection approach that allows organizations to collaboratively train ML models. Three experiments have leveraged three manually validated datasets aimed at detecting and examining different code smell scenarios. An accuracy of 98.34% was achieved by the global model that has been trained using 10 companies for 100 training rounds.
• Score: 7.026278088747708
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper proposes a Federated Learning Code Smell Detection (FedCSD) approach that allows organizations to collaboratively train federated ML models while preserving their data privacy. These assertions have been supported by three experiments that have significantly leveraged three manually validated datasets aimed at detecting and examining different code smell scenarios. In experiment 1, which was concerned with a centralized training experiment, dataset two achieved the lowest accuracy (92.30%) with fewer smells, while datasets one and three achieved the highest accuracy with a slight difference (98.90% and 99.5%, respectively). This was followed by experiment 2, which was concerned with cross-evaluation, where each ML model was trained using one dataset, which was then evaluated over the other two datasets. Results from this experiment show a significant drop in the model's accuracy (lowest accuracy: 63.80\%) where fewer smells exist in the training dataset, which has a noticeable reflection (technical debt) on the model's performance. Finally, the last and third experiments evaluate our approach by splitting the dataset into 10 companies. The ML model was trained on the company's site, then all model-updated weights were transferred to the server. Ultimately, an accuracy of 98.34% was achieved by the global model that has been trained using 10 companies for 100 training rounds. The results reveal a slight difference in the global model's accuracy compared to the highest accuracy of the centralized model, which can be ignored in favour of the global model's comprehensive knowledge, lower training cost, preservation of data privacy, and avoidance of the technical debt problem.

Related papers

• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• Federated Learning with Projected Trajectory Regularization [65.6266768678291]
  Federated learning enables joint training of machine learning models from distributed clients without sharing their local data. One key challenge in federated learning is to handle non-identically distributed data across the clients. We propose a novel federated learning framework with projected trajectory regularization (FedPTR) for tackling the data issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T02:12:08Z)
• Exploiting Label Skews in Federated Learning with Model Concatenation [39.38427550571378]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to perform deep learning on different data owners without exchanging raw data. Among different non-IID types, label skews have been challenging and common in image classification and other tasks. We propose FedConcat, a simple and effective approach that degrades these local models as the base of the global model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T10:44:52Z)
• Open-Set Semi-Supervised Learning for 3D Point Cloud Understanding [62.17020485045456]
  It is commonly assumed in semi-supervised learning (SSL) that the unlabeled data are drawn from the same distribution as that of the labeled ones. We propose to selectively utilize unlabeled data through sample weighting, so that only conducive unlabeled data would be prioritized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T16:09:17Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• What Stops Learning-based 3D Registration from Working in the Real World? [53.68326201131434]
  This work identifies the sources of 3D point cloud registration failures, analyze the reasons behind them, and propose solutions. Ultimately, this translates to a best-practice 3D registration network (BPNet), constituting the first learning-based method able to handle previously-unseen objects in real-world data. Our model generalizes to real data without any fine-tuning, reaching an accuracy of up to 67% on point clouds of unseen objects obtained with a commercial sensor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T19:24:27Z)
• Complementary Ensemble Learning [1.90365714903665]
  We derive a technique to improve performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models. Specifically, we train auxiliary models which are able to complement state-of-the-art model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T03:23:05Z)
• BiFair: Training Fair Models with Bilevel Optimization [8.2509884277533]
  We develop a new training algorithm, named BiFair, which jointly minimizes for a utility, and a fairness loss of interest. Our algorithm consistently performs better, i.e., we reach to better values of a given fairness metric under same, or higher accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T22:36:17Z)
• Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentation [123.37082242750866]
  Federated learning has emerged as an important distributed learning paradigm, where a server aggregates a global model from many client-trained models while having no access to the client data. We propose a novel federated learning system that employs zero-shot data augmentation on under-represented data to mitigate statistical heterogeneity and encourage more uniform accuracy performance across clients in federated networks. We study two variants of this scheme, Fed-ZDAC (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the clients) and Fed-ZDAS (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the server).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T18:23:54Z)
• CatFedAvg: Optimising Communication-efficiency and Classification Accuracy in Federated Learning [2.2172881631608456]
  We introduce a new family of Federated Learning algorithms called CatFedAvg. It improves the communication efficiency but improves the quality of learning using a category coverage inNIST strategy. Our experiments show that an increase of 10% absolute points accuracy using the M dataset with 70% absolute points lower network transfer over FedAvg.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-14T06:52:02Z)
• Distilled One-Shot Federated Learning [13.294757670979031]
  We propose Distilled One-Shot Federated Learning (DOSFL) to significantly reduce the communication cost while achieving comparable performance. In just one round, each client distills their private dataset, sends the synthetic data (e.g. images or sentences) to the server, and collectively trains a global model. With this weight-less and gradient-less design, the total communication cost of DOSFL is up to three orders of magnitude less than FedAvg.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-17T01:14:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.