A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00403v1
• Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:08:22 GMT
• Title: A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems
• Authors: Di Jin, Luzhi Wang, He Zhang, Yizhen Zheng, Weiping Ding, Feng Xia, Shirui Pan
• Abstract summary: We present concepts of fairness in different recommendation scenarios, comprehensively categorize current advances, and introduce typical methods to promote fairness in different stages of recommender systems. Next, we delve into the significant influence that fairness-aware recommender systems exert on real-world industrial applications.
• Score: 59.23208133653637
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As information filtering services, recommender systems have extremely enriched our daily life by providing personalized suggestions and facilitating people in decision-making, which makes them vital and indispensable to human society in the information era. However, as people become more dependent on them, recent studies show that recommender systems potentially own unintentional impacts on society and individuals because of their unfairness (e.g., gender discrimination in job recommendations). To develop trustworthy services, it is crucial to devise fairness-aware recommender systems that can mitigate these bias issues. In this survey, we summarise existing methodologies and practices of fairness in recommender systems. Firstly, we present concepts of fairness in different recommendation scenarios, comprehensively categorize current advances, and introduce typical methods to promote fairness in different stages of recommender systems. Next, after introducing datasets and evaluation metrics applied to assess the fairness of recommender systems, we will delve into the significant influence that fairness-aware recommender systems exert on real-world industrial applications. Subsequently, we highlight the connection between fairness and other principles of trustworthy recommender systems, aiming to consider trustworthiness principles holistically while advocating for fairness. Finally, we summarize this review, spotlighting promising opportunities in comprehending concepts, frameworks, the balance between accuracy and fairness, and the ties with trustworthiness, with the ultimate goal of fostering the development of fairness-aware recommender systems.

Related papers

• Pessimistic Evaluation [58.736490198613154]
  We argue that evaluating information access systems assumes utilitarian values not aligned with traditions of information access based on equal access. We advocate for pessimistic evaluation of information access systems focusing on worst case utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T15:40:09Z)
• Consumer-side Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Survey of Methods and Evaluation [1.4123323039043334]
  Growing awareness of discrimination in machine learning methods motivated both academia and industry to research how fairness can be ensured in recommender systems. For recommender systems, such issues are well exemplified by occupation recommendation, where biases in historical data may lead to recommender systems relating one gender to lower wages or to the propagation of stereotypes. This survey serves as a systematic overview and discussion of the current research on consumer-side fairness in recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T10:07:41Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems [32.523177842969915]
  We provide a comprehensive overview of Trustworthy Recommender systems (TRec) with a specific focus on six of the most important aspects. For each aspect, we summarize the recent related technologies and discuss potential research directions to help achieve trustworthy recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T04:34:17Z)
• Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications [38.63520487389138]
  This survey focuses on the foundations for fairness in recommendation literature. It first presents a brief introduction about fairness in basic machine learning tasks such as classification and ranking. After that, the survey will introduce fairness in recommendation with a focus on the definitions, the typical techniques for improving fairness, as well as the datasets for fairness studies in recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T20:48:53Z)
• Balancing Accuracy and Fairness for Interactive Recommendation with Reinforcement Learning [68.25805655688876]
  Fairness in recommendation has attracted increasing attention due to bias and discrimination possibly caused by traditional recommenders. We propose a reinforcement learning based framework, FairRec, to dynamically maintain a long-term balance between accuracy and fairness in IRS. Extensive experiments validate that FairRec can improve fairness, while preserving good recommendation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T02:02:51Z)
• Towards Personalized Fairness based on Causal Notion [18.5897206797918]
  We introduce a framework for achieving counterfactually fair recommendations through adversary learning. Our method can generate fairer recommendations for users with a desirable recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:24:34Z)
• Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspective [14.830700792215849]
  We discuss user perspectives of fairness-aware recommender systems. We propose three features that could improve user understanding of and trust in fairness-aware recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T00:42:09Z)
• DeepFair: Deep Learning for Improving Fairness in Recommender Systems [63.732639864601914]
  The lack of bias management in Recommender Systems leads to minority groups receiving unfair recommendations. We propose a Deep Learning based Collaborative Filtering algorithm that provides recommendations with an optimum balance between fairness and accuracy without knowing demographic information about the users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T13:39:38Z)
• Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
  We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users. We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z)
• Survey for Trust-aware Recommender Systems: A Deep Learning Perspective [48.2733163413522]
  It becomes critical to embrace a trustworthy recommender system. This survey provides a systemic summary of three categories of trust-aware recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T02:11:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.