T2IAT: Measuring Valence and Stereotypical Biases in Text-to-Image Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00905v1
• Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:02:51 GMT
• Title: T2IAT: Measuring Valence and Stereotypical Biases in Text-to-Image Generation
• Authors: Jialu Wang, Xinyue Gabby Liu, Zonglin Di, Yang Liu, Xin Eric Wang
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel Text-to-Image Association Test (T2IAT) framework that quantifies the implicit stereotypes between concepts and images. We replicate the previously documented bias tests on generative models, including morally neutral tests on flowers and insects. The results of these experiments demonstrate the presence of complex stereotypical behaviors in image generations.
• Score: 11.109588924016254
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Warning: This paper contains several contents that may be toxic, harmful, or offensive. In the last few years, text-to-image generative models have gained remarkable success in generating images with unprecedented quality accompanied by a breakthrough of inference speed. Despite their rapid progress, human biases that manifest in the training examples, particularly with regard to common stereotypical biases, like gender and skin tone, still have been found in these generative models. In this work, we seek to measure more complex human biases exist in the task of text-to-image generations. Inspired by the well-known Implicit Association Test (IAT) from social psychology, we propose a novel Text-to-Image Association Test (T2IAT) framework that quantifies the implicit stereotypes between concepts and valence, and those in the images. We replicate the previously documented bias tests on generative models, including morally neutral tests on flowers and insects as well as demographic stereotypical tests on diverse social attributes. The results of these experiments demonstrate the presence of complex stereotypical behaviors in image generations.

Related papers

• Gender Bias Evaluation in Text-to-image Generation: A Survey [25.702257177921048]
  We review recent work on gender bias evaluation in text-to-image generation. We focus on the evaluation of recent popular models such as Stable Diffusion and DALL-E 2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T06:01:23Z)
• The Male CEO and the Female Assistant: Evaluation and Mitigation of Gender Biases in Text-To-Image Generation of Dual Subjects [58.27353205269664]
  We propose the Paired Stereotype Test (PST) framework, which queries T2I models to depict two individuals assigned with male-stereotyped and female-stereotyped social identities. PST queries T2I models to depict two individuals assigned with male-stereotyped and female-stereotyped social identities. Using PST, we evaluate two aspects of gender biases -- the well-known bias in gendered occupation and a novel aspect: bias in organizational power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T21:32:27Z)
• New Job, New Gender? Measuring the Social Bias in Image Generation Models [85.26441602999014]
  Image generation models are susceptible to generating content that perpetuates social stereotypes and biases. We propose BiasPainter, a framework that can accurately, automatically and comprehensively trigger social bias in image generation models. BiasPainter can achieve 90.8% accuracy on automatic bias detection, which is significantly higher than the results reported in previous work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T14:06:55Z)
• Word-Level Explanations for Analyzing Bias in Text-to-Image Models [72.71184730702086]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models can generate images that underrepresent minorities based on race and sex. This paper investigates which word in the input prompt is responsible for bias in generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T21:39:07Z)
• Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lens [9.137275391251517]
  Text-to-Image (T2I) generation is enabling new applications that support creators, designers, and general end users of productivity software. We take a multi-dimensional approach to studying and quantifying common social biases as reflected in the generated images. We present findings for two popular T2I models: DALLE-v2 and Stable Diffusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T05:29:13Z)
• A Friendly Face: Do Text-to-Image Systems Rely on Stereotypes when the Input is Under-Specified? [7.586041161211335]
  We investigate properties of images generated in response to prompts which are visually under-specified. We find that in many cases, images contain similar demographic biases to those reported in the stereotype literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T16:11:06Z)
• Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale [61.555788332182395]
  We investigate the potential for machine learning models to amplify dangerous and complex stereotypes. We find a broad range of ordinary prompts produce stereotypes, including prompts simply mentioning traits, descriptors, occupations, or objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T18:31:07Z)
• How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions? [67.97752431429865]
  We study the effect on the diversity of the generated images when adding ethical intervention. Preliminary studies indicate that a large change in the model predictions is triggered by certain phrases such as 'irrespective of gender'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T07:32:39Z)
• DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Models [73.12069620086311]
  We investigate the visual reasoning capabilities and social biases of text-to-image models. First, we measure three visual reasoning skills: object recognition, object counting, and spatial relation understanding. Second, we assess the gender and skin tone biases by measuring the gender/skin tone distribution of generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T18:36:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.