Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For
Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instruction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03090v1
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:59:21 GMT
- Title: Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For
Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instruction
- Authors: Rose E. Wang, Dorottya Demszky
- Abstract summary: We investigate whether generative AI could become a cost-effective complement to expert feedback by serving as an automated teacher coach.
We propose three teacher coaching tasks for generative AI: (A) scoring transcript segments based on classroom observation instruments, (B) identifying highlights and missed opportunities for good instructional strategies, and (C) providing actionable suggestions for eliciting more student reasoning.
We recruit expert math teachers to evaluate the zero-shot performance of ChatGPT on each of these tasks for elementary classroom math transcripts.
- Score: 5.948322127194399
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Coaching, which involves classroom observation and expert feedback, is a
widespread and fundamental part of teacher training. However, the majority of
teachers do not have access to consistent, high quality coaching due to limited
resources and access to expertise. We explore whether generative AI could
become a cost-effective complement to expert feedback by serving as an
automated teacher coach. In doing so, we propose three teacher coaching tasks
for generative AI: (A) scoring transcript segments based on classroom
observation instruments, (B) identifying highlights and missed opportunities
for good instructional strategies, and (C) providing actionable suggestions for
eliciting more student reasoning. We recruit expert math teachers to evaluate
the zero-shot performance of ChatGPT on each of these tasks for elementary math
classroom transcripts. Our results reveal that ChatGPT generates responses that
are relevant to improving instruction, but they are often not novel or
insightful. For example, 82% of the model's suggestions point to places in the
transcript where the teacher is already implementing that suggestion. Our work
highlights the challenges of producing insightful, novel and truthful feedback
for teachers while paving the way for future research to address these
obstacles and improve the capacity of generative AI to coach teachers.
Related papers
- CANDERE-COACH: Reinforcement Learning from Noisy Feedback [12.232688822099325]
The CANDERE-COACH algorithm is capable of learning from noisy feedback by a nonoptimal teacher.
We propose a noise-filtering mechanism to de-noise online feedback data, thereby enabling the RL agent to successfully learn with up to 40% of the teacher feedback being incorrect.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T20:14:12Z) - Leveraging Large Language Models for Actionable Course Evaluation Student Feedback to Lecturers [6.161370712594005]
We have 742 student responses ranging over 75 courses in a Computer Science department.
For each course, we synthesise a summary of the course evaluations and actionable items for the instructor.
Our work highlights the possibility of using generative AI to produce factual, actionable, and appropriate feedback for teachers in the classroom setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T13:29:55Z) - Active teacher selection for reinforcement learning from human feedback [14.009227941725783]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) enables machine learning systems to learn objectives from human feedback.
We propose the Hidden Utility Bandit framework to model differences in teacher rationality, expertise, and costliness.
We develop a variety of solution algorithms and apply them to two real-world domains: paper recommendation systems and COVID-19 vaccine testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T18:54:43Z) - PapagAI:Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays [48.4434976446053]
We present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system.
The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T11:05:51Z) - Can Language Models Teach Weaker Agents? Teacher Explanations Improve
Students via Personalization [84.86241161706911]
We show that teacher LLMs can indeed intervene on student reasoning to improve their performance.
We also demonstrate that in multi-turn interactions, teacher explanations generalize and learn from explained data.
We verify that misaligned teachers can lower student performance to random chance by intentionally misleading them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T17:27:20Z) - Computationally Identifying Funneling and Focusing Questions in
Classroom Discourse [24.279653100481863]
We propose the task of computationally detecting funneling and focusing questions in classroom discourse.
We release an annotated dataset of 2,348 teacher utterances labeled for funneling and focusing questions, or neither.
Our best model, a supervised RoBERTa model fine-tuned on our dataset, has a strong linear correlation of.76 with human expert labels and with positive educational outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-08T01:28:29Z) - Better Teacher Better Student: Dynamic Prior Knowledge for Knowledge
Distillation [70.92135839545314]
We propose the dynamic prior knowledge (DPK), which integrates part of teacher's features as the prior knowledge before the feature distillation.
Our DPK makes the performance of the student model positively correlated with that of the teacher model, which means that we can further boost the accuracy of students by applying larger teachers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T11:52:13Z) - Iterative Teacher-Aware Learning [136.05341445369265]
In human pedagogy, teachers and students can interact adaptively to maximize communication efficiency.
We propose a gradient optimization based teacher-aware learner who can incorporate teacher's cooperative intention into the likelihood function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-01T00:27:47Z) - Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online
Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings.
By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z) - Siamese Neural Networks for Class Activity Detection [49.320548570516124]
We build a Siamese neural framework to automatically identify teacher and student utterances from classroom recordings.
The proposed model is evaluated on real-world educational datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-15T14:03:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.