Can Language Models Teach Weaker Agents? Teacher Explanations Improve Students via Personalization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09299v2
• Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 05:24:06 GMT
• Title: Can Language Models Teach Weaker Agents? Teacher Explanations Improve Students via Personalization
• Authors: Swarnadeep Saha, Peter Hase, Mohit Bansal
• Abstract summary: We show that teacher LLMs can indeed intervene on student reasoning to improve their performance. We also demonstrate that in multi-turn interactions, teacher explanations generalize and learn from explained data. We verify that misaligned teachers can lower student performance to random chance by intentionally misleading them.
• Score: 84.86241161706911
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A hallmark property of explainable AI models is the ability to teach other agents, communicating knowledge of how to perform a task. While Large Language Models perform complex reasoning by generating explanations for their predictions, it is unclear whether they also make good teachers for weaker agents. To address this, we consider a student-teacher framework between two LLM agents and study if, when, and how the teacher should intervene with natural language explanations to improve the student's performance. Since communication is expensive, we define a budget such that the teacher only communicates explanations for a fraction of the data, after which the student should perform well on its own. We decompose the teaching problem along four axes: (1) if teacher's test time intervention improve student predictions, (2) when it is worth explaining a data point, (3) how the teacher should personalize explanations to better teach the student, and (4) if teacher explanations also improve students on future unexplained data. We first show that teacher LLMs can indeed intervene on student reasoning to improve their performance. Next, inspired by the Theory of Mind abilities of effective teachers, we propose building two few-shot mental models of the student. The first model defines an Intervention Function that simulates the utility of an intervention, allowing the teacher to intervene when this utility is the highest and improving student performance at lower budgets. The second model enables the teacher to personalize explanations for a particular student and outperform unpersonalized teachers. We also demonstrate that in multi-turn interactions, teacher explanations generalize and learning from explained data improves student performance on future unexplained data. Finally, we verify that misaligned teachers can lower student performance to random chance by intentionally misleading them.

Related papers

• Representational Alignment Supports Effective Machine Teaching [81.19197059407121]
  We integrate insights from machine teaching and pragmatic communication with the literature on representational alignment. We design a supervised learning environment that disentangles representational alignment from teacher accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:48:24Z)
• Good Teachers Explain: Explanation-Enhanced Knowledge Distillation [52.498055901649025]
  Knowledge Distillation (KD) has proven effective for compressing large teacher models into smaller student models. In this work, we explore whether this can be achieved by not only optimizing the classic KD loss but also the similarity of the explanations generated by the teacher and the student. Despite the idea being simple and intuitive, we find that our proposed 'explanation-enhanced' KD consistently provides large gains in terms of accuracy and student-teacher agreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T15:47:54Z)
• Large Language Models are In-context Teachers for Knowledge Reasoning [8.869111204842248]
  We study in-context teaching (ICT) where a teacher provides in-context example rationales to teach a student to reason over unseen cases. We ask whether a large language model (LLM) can serve as a more effective in-context teacher for itself or other LLMs, compared to humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T23:14:43Z)
• Improving Knowledge Distillation with Teacher's Explanation [14.935696904019146]
  We introduce a novel Knowledge Explaining Distillation (KED) framework. KED allows the student to learn not only from the teacher's predictions but also from the teacher's explanations. Our experiments over a variety of datasets show that KED students can substantially outperform KD students of similar complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T04:18:01Z)
• MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problems [74.73881579517055]
  We propose a framework to generate such dialogues by pairing human teachers with a Large Language Model prompted to represent common student errors. We describe how we use this framework to collect MathDial, a dataset of 3k one-to-one teacher-student tutoring dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T21:44:56Z)
• Computationally Identifying Funneling and Focusing Questions in Classroom Discourse [24.279653100481863]
  We propose the task of computationally detecting funneling and focusing questions in classroom discourse. We release an annotated dataset of 2,348 teacher utterances labeled for funneling and focusing questions, or neither. Our best model, a supervised RoBERTa model fine-tuned on our dataset, has a strong linear correlation of.76 with human expert labels and with positive educational outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-08T01:28:29Z)
• Know Thy Student: Interactive Learning with Gaussian Processes [11.641731210416102]
  Our work proposes a simple diagnosis algorithm which uses Gaussian processes for inferring student-related information, before constructing a teaching dataset. We study this in the offline reinforcement learning setting where the teacher must provide demonstrations to the student and avoid sending redundant trajectories. Our experiments highlight the importance of diagosing before teaching and demonstrate how students can learn more efficiently with the help of an interactive teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T04:43:57Z)
• Explainable Student Performance Prediction With Personalized Attention for Explaining Why A Student Fails [0.5607676459156788]
  We propose a novel Explainable Student performance prediction method with Personalized Attention (ESPA) BiLSTM architecture extracts the semantic information in the paths with specific patterns. The ESPA consistently outperforms the other state-of-the-art models for student performance prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T08:45:43Z)
• Iterative Teacher-Aware Learning [136.05341445369265]
  In human pedagogy, teachers and students can interact adaptively to maximize communication efficiency. We propose a gradient optimization based teacher-aware learner who can incorporate teacher's cooperative intention into the likelihood function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T00:27:47Z)
• Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work? [106.38447017262183]
  We show that while knowledge distillation can improve student generalization, it does not typically work as it is commonly understood. We identify difficulties in optimization as a key reason for why the student is unable to match the teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T17:44:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.