ChatGPT is a Remarkable Tool -- For Experts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03102v1
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 06:28:21 GMT
- Title: ChatGPT is a Remarkable Tool -- For Experts
- Authors: Amos Azaria, Rina Azoulay, Shulamit Reches
- Abstract summary: We explore the potential of ChatGPT to enhance productivity, streamline problem-solving processes, and improve writing style.
We highlight the potential risks associated with excessive reliance on ChatGPT in these fields.
We outline areas and objectives where ChatGPT proves beneficial, applications where it should be used judiciously, and scenarios where its reliability may be limited.
- Score: 9.46644539427004
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper investigates the capabilities of ChatGPT as an automated assistant
in diverse domains, including scientific writing, mathematics, education,
programming, and healthcare. We explore the potential of ChatGPT to enhance
productivity, streamline problem-solving processes, and improve writing style.
Furthermore, we highlight the potential risks associated with excessive
reliance on ChatGPT in these fields. These limitations encompass factors like
incorrect and fictitious responses, inaccuracies in code, limited logical
reasoning abilities, overconfidence, and critical ethical concerns of
copyrights and privacy violation. We outline areas and objectives where ChatGPT
proves beneficial, applications where it should be used judiciously, and
scenarios where its reliability may be limited. In light of observed
limitations, and given that the tool's fundamental errors may pose a special
challenge for non-experts, ChatGPT should be used with a strategic methodology.
By drawing from comprehensive experimental studies, we offer methods and flow
charts for effectively using ChatGPT. Our recommendations emphasize iterative
interaction with ChatGPT and independent verification of its outputs.
Considering the importance of utilizing ChatGPT judiciously and with expertise,
we recommend its usage for experts who are well-versed in the respective
domains.
Related papers
- Investigating the Utility of ChatGPT in the Issue Tracking System: An
Exploratory Study [5.176434782905268]
This study examines the interaction between ChatGPT and developers to analyze their prevalent activities and provide a resolution.
Our investigation reveals that developers mainly use ChatGPT for brainstorming solutions but often opt to write their code instead of using ChatGPT-generated code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T06:03:05Z) - Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples.
One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports.
Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z) - AI and Education: An Investigation into the Use of ChatGPT for Systems
Thinking [0.09618478226711495]
The study assesses the accuracy, helpfulness, and reliability of ChatGPT's responses across different versions of the tool.
Despite some limitations, this study suggests that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for teaching and learning systems thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-26T14:12:16Z) - Decoding ChatGPT: A Taxonomy of Existing Research, Current Challenges,
and Possible Future Directions [2.5427838419316946]
Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has gained significant interest and attention since its launch in November 2022.
We present a comprehensive review of over 100 Scopus-indexed publications on ChatGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-26T11:10:04Z) - Transformative Effects of ChatGPT on Modern Education: Emerging Era of
AI Chatbots [36.760677949631514]
ChatGPT was released to provide coherent and useful replies based on analysis of large volumes of data.
Our preliminary evaluation concludes that ChatGPT performed differently in each subject area including finance, coding and maths.
There are clear drawbacks in its use, such as the possibility of producing inaccurate or false data.
Academic regulations and evaluation practices need to be updated, should ChatGPT be used as a tool in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T17:35:57Z) - ChatGPT for Us: Preserving Data Privacy in ChatGPT via Dialogue Text
Ambiguation to Expand Mental Health Care Delivery [52.73936514734762]
ChatGPT has gained popularity for its ability to generate human-like dialogue.
Data-sensitive domains face challenges in using ChatGPT due to privacy and data-ownership concerns.
We propose a text ambiguation framework that preserves user privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T02:09:52Z) - To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection.
We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains.
Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z) - Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and
Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries.
We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models.
We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z) - Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot.
Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community.
It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z) - A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation.
It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries.
However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.