Revisiting Permutation Symmetry for Merging Models between Different Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05641v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 03:00:34 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Permutation Symmetry for Merging Models between Different Datasets
• Authors: Masanori Yamada, Tomoya Yamashita, Shin'ya Yamaguchi, Daiki Chijiwa
• Abstract summary: We investigate the properties of merging models between different datasets. We find that the accuracy of the merged model decreases more significantly as the datasets diverge more. We show that condensed datasets created by dataset condensation can be used as substitutes for the original datasets.
• Score: 3.234560001579257
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model merging is a new approach to creating a new model by combining the weights of different trained models. Previous studies report that model merging works well for models trained on a single dataset with different random seeds, while model merging between different datasets is difficult. Merging knowledge from different datasets has practical significance, but it has not been well investigated. In this paper, we investigate the properties of merging models between different datasets. Through theoretical and empirical analyses, we find that the accuracy of the merged model decreases more significantly as the datasets diverge more and that the different loss landscapes for each dataset make model merging between different datasets difficult. We also show that merged models require datasets for merging in order to achieve a high accuracy. Furthermore, we show that condensed datasets created by dataset condensation can be used as substitutes for the original datasets when merging models. We conduct experiments for model merging between different datasets. When merging between MNIST and Fashion- MNIST models, the accuracy significantly improves by 28% using the dataset and 25% using the condensed dataset compared with not using the dataset.

Related papers

• Knowledge is a Region in Weight Space for Fine-tuned Language Models [48.589822853418404]
  We study how the weight space and the underlying loss landscape of different models are interconnected. We show that language models that have been finetuned on the same dataset form a tight cluster in the weight space, while models finetuned on different datasets from the same underlying task form a looser cluster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T18:59:18Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Combining datasets to increase the number of samples and improve model fitting [7.4771091238795595]
  We propose a novel framework called Combine datasets based on Imputation (ComImp) In addition, we propose a variant of ComImp that uses Principle Component Analysis (PCA), PCA-ComImp in order to reduce dimension before combining datasets. Our results indicate that the proposed methods are somewhat similar to transfer learning in that the merge can significantly improve the accuracy of a prediction model on smaller datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T06:06:37Z)
• Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
  We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis. We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z)
• A Case for Dataset Specific Profiling [0.9023847175654603]
  Data-driven science is an emerging paradigm where scientific discoveries depend on the execution of computational AI models against rich, discipline-specific datasets. With modern machine learning frameworks, anyone can develop and execute computational models that reveal concepts hidden in the data that could enable scientific applications. For important and widely used datasets, computing the performance of every computational model that can run against a dataset is cost prohibitive in terms of cloud resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-01T18:38:05Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• Learning to Model and Ignore Dataset Bias with Mixed Capacity Ensembles [66.15398165275926]
  We propose a method that can automatically detect and ignore dataset-specific patterns, which we call dataset biases. Our method trains a lower capacity model in an ensemble with a higher capacity model. We show improvement in all settings, including a 10 point gain on the visual question answering dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-07T22:20:03Z)
• Mixed data Deep Gaussian Mixture Model: A clustering model for mixed datasets [0.0]
  We introduce a model-based clustering method called Mixed Deep Gaussian Mixture Model (MDGMM) This architecture is flexible and can be adapted to mixed as well as to continuous or non-continuous data. Our model provides continuous low-dimensional representations of the data which can be a useful tool to visualize mixed datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T19:52:46Z)
• Data from Model: Extracting Data from Non-robust and Robust Models [83.60161052867534]
  This work explores the reverse process of generating data from a model, attempting to reveal the relationship between the data and the model. We repeat the process of Data to Model (DtM) and Data from Model (DfM) in sequence and explore the loss of feature mapping information. Our results show that the accuracy drop is limited even after multiple sequences of DtM and DfM, especially for robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T05:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.