Bayesian Inverse Contextual Reasoning for Heterogeneous Semantics-Native Communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06403v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 10:10:55 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Inverse Contextual Reasoning for Heterogeneous Semantics-Native Communication
• Authors: Hyowoon Seo, Yoonseong Kang, Mehdi Bennis, Wan Choi
• Abstract summary: When agents do not share the same communication context, the effectiveness of contextual reasoning is compromised. This article proposes a novel framework for solving the inverse problem of CR in SNC using two Bayesian inference methods.
• Score: 47.9462619619438
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This work deals with the heterogeneous semantic-native communication (SNC) problem. When agents do not share the same communication context, the effectiveness of contextual reasoning (CR) is compromised calling for agents to infer other agents' context. This article proposes a novel framework for solving the inverse problem of CR in SNC using two Bayesian inference methods, namely: Bayesian inverse CR (iCR) and Bayesian inverse linearized CR (iLCR). The first proposed Bayesian iCR method utilizes Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to infer the agent's context while being computationally expensive. To address this issue, a Bayesian iLCR method is leveraged which obtains a linearized CR (LCR) model by training a linear neural network. Experimental results show that the Bayesian iLCR method requires less computation and achieves higher inference accuracy compared to Bayesian iCR. Additionally, heterogeneous SNC based on the context obtained through the Bayesian iLCR method shows better communication effectiveness than that of Bayesian iCR. Overall, this work provides valuable insights and methods to improve the effectiveness of SNC in situations where agents have different contexts.

Related papers

• Fast Context-Biasing for CTC and Transducer ASR models with CTC-based Word Spotter [57.64003871384959]
  This work presents a new approach to fast context-biasing with CTC-based Word Spotter. The proposed method matches CTC log-probabilities against a compact context graph to detect potential context-biasing candidates. The results demonstrate a significant acceleration of the context-biasing recognition with a simultaneous improvement in F-score and WER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T09:37:52Z)
• Crossmodal ASR Error Correction with Discrete Speech Units [16.58209270191005]
  We propose a post-ASR processing approach for ASR Error Correction (AEC) We explore pre-training and fine-tuning strategies and uncover an ASR domain discrepancy phenomenon. We propose the incorporation of discrete speech units to align with and enhance the word embeddings for improving AEC quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T19:58:38Z)
• A Rationale-centric Counterfactual Data Augmentation Method for Cross-Document Event Coreference Resolution [29.34028569245905]
  We formalize the decision-making process of the baseline ECR system using a Structural Causal Model (SCM) We develop a rationale-centric counterfactual data augmentation method with LLM-in-the-loop. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on three popular cross-document ECR benchmarks and demonstrates robustness in out-of-domain scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T13:15:07Z)
• Cross-modal Active Complementary Learning with Self-refining Correspondence [54.61307946222386]
  We propose a Cross-modal Robust Complementary Learning framework (CRCL) to improve the robustness of existing methods. ACL exploits active and complementary learning losses to reduce the risk of providing erroneous supervision. SCC utilizes multiple self-refining processes with momentum correction to enlarge the receptive field for correcting correspondences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T15:15:11Z)
• Negotiated Reasoning: On Provably Addressing Relative Over-Generalization [49.5896371203566]
  Over-generalization is a thorny issue in cognitive science, where people may become overly cautious due to past experiences. Agents in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) also have been found to suffer relative over-generalization (RO) as people do and stuck to sub-optimal cooperation. Recent methods have shown that assigning reasoning ability to agents can mitigate RO algorithmically and empirically, but there has been a lack of theoretical understanding of RO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T16:57:12Z)
• False Correlation Reduction for Offline Reinforcement Learning [115.11954432080749]
  We propose falSe COrrelation REduction (SCORE) for offline RL, a practically effective and theoretically provable algorithm. We empirically show that SCORE achieves the SoTA performance with 3.1x acceleration on various tasks in a standard benchmark (D4RL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:34:03Z)
• Continual Learning in Recurrent Neural Networks [67.05499844830231]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of continual learning methods for processing sequential data with recurrent neural networks (RNNs) We shed light on the particularities that arise when applying weight-importance methods, such as elastic weight consolidation, to RNNs. We show that the performance of weight-importance methods is not directly affected by the length of the processed sequences, but rather by high working memory requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T10:05:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.