Towards Regulatable AI Systems: Technical Gaps and Policy Opportunities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12609v2
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:11:30 GMT
- Title: Towards Regulatable AI Systems: Technical Gaps and Policy Opportunities
- Authors: Xudong Shen, Hannah Brown, Jiashu Tao, Martin Strobel, Yao Tong, Akshay Narayan, Harold Soh, Finale Doshi-Velez,
- Abstract summary: We consider the technical half of the question: To what extent can AI experts vet an AI system for adherence to regulatory requirements?
We investigate this question through the lens of two public sector procurement checklists.
- Score: 26.50898051963262
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: There is increasing attention being given to how to regulate AI systems. As governing bodies grapple with what values to encapsulate into regulation, we consider the technical half of the question: To what extent can AI experts vet an AI system for adherence to regulatory requirements? We investigate this question through the lens of two public sector procurement checklists, identifying what we can do now, what should be possible with technical innovation, and what requirements need a more interdisciplinary approach.
Related papers
- Open Problems in Technical AI Governance [93.89102632003996]
Technical AI governance refers to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI.
This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-20T21:13:56Z) - From Principles to Rules: A Regulatory Approach for Frontier AI [2.1764247401772705]
Regulators may require frontier AI developers to adopt safety measures.
The requirements could be formulated as high-level principles or specific rules.
These regulatory approaches, known as 'principle-based' and 'rule-based' regulation, have complementary strengths and weaknesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-10T01:45:15Z) - A Blueprint for Auditing Generative AI [0.9999629695552196]
generative AI systems display emergent capabilities and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks.
Existing auditing procedures fail to address the governance challenges posed by generative AI systems.
We propose a three-layered approach, whereby governance audits of technology providers that design and disseminate generative AI systems, model audits of generative AI systems after pre-training but prior to their release, and application audits of applications based on top of generative AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T11:56:54Z) - Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety.
A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology.
This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z) - The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage.
Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z) - Automated Compliance Blueprint Optimization with Artificial Intelligence [1.90073733366566]
In banking and healthcare, one of the major hindrances to the adoption of cloud computing is compliance with regulatory standards.
This is a complex problem due to many regulatory and technical specification (techspec) documents that the companies need to comply with.
We present early results to identify the mapping between techspecs and regulation controls, and discuss challenges that must be overcome for this solution to be fully practical.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-22T15:59:16Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - A Pragmatic Approach to Regulating Artificial Intelligence: A Technology
Regulator's Perspective [1.614803913005309]
We present a pragmatic approach for providing a technology assurance regulatory framework.
It is proposed that such regulation should not be mandated for all AI-based systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T16:49:29Z) - Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable
Claims [59.64274607533249]
AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable.
This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.