Are Good Explainers Secretly Human-in-the-Loop Active Learners?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13935v3
• Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:33:07 GMT
• Title: Are Good Explainers Secretly Human-in-the-Loop Active Learners?
• Authors: Emma Thuong Nguyen, Abhishek Ghose,
• Abstract summary: Explainable AI (XAI) techniques have become popular for multiple use-cases in the past few years. Here we consider its use in studying model predictions to gather additional training data. We argue that this is equivalent to Active Learning, where the query strategy involves a human-in-the-loop.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) techniques have become popular for multiple use-cases in the past few years. Here we consider its use in studying model predictions to gather additional training data. We argue that this is equivalent to Active Learning, where the query strategy involves a human-in-the-loop. We provide a mathematical approximation for the role of the human, and present a general formalization of the end-to-end workflow. This enables us to rigorously compare this use with standard Active Learning algorithms, while allowing for extensions to the workflow. An added benefit is that their utility can be assessed via simulation instead of conducting expensive user-studies. We also present some initial promising results.

Related papers

• On Stateful Value Factorization in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [19.342676562701794]
  We introduce Duelmix, a factorization algorithm that learns distinct per-agent utility estimators to improve performance. Experiments on StarCraft II micromanagement and Box Pushing tasks demonstrate the benefits of our intuitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T19:45:26Z)
• Batch Active Learning of Reward Functions from Human Preferences [33.39413552270375]
  Preference-based learning enables reliable labeling by querying users with preference questions. Active querying methods are commonly employed in preference-based learning to generate more informative data. We develop a set of novel algorithms that enable efficient learning of reward functions using as few data samples as possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T08:07:48Z)
• Learning to Rank for Active Learning via Multi-Task Bilevel Optimization [29.207101107965563]
  We propose a novel approach for active learning, which aims to select batches of unlabeled instances through a learned surrogate model for data acquisition. A key challenge in this approach is developing an acquisition function that generalizes well, as the history of data, which forms part of the utility function's input, grows over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T22:50:09Z)
• PILOT: A Pre-Trained Model-Based Continual Learning Toolbox [71.63186089279218]
  This paper introduces a pre-trained model-based continual learning toolbox known as PILOT. On the one hand, PILOT implements some state-of-the-art class-incremental learning algorithms based on pre-trained models, such as L2P, DualPrompt, and CODA-Prompt. On the other hand, PILOT fits typical class-incremental learning algorithms within the context of pre-trained models to evaluate their effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T17:55:11Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Passive Data via Latent Intentions [86.4969514480008]
  We show that passive data can still be used to learn features that accelerate downstream RL. Our approach learns from passive data by modeling intentions. Our experiments demonstrate the ability to learn from many forms of passive data, including cross-embodiment video data and YouTube videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:59:05Z)
• Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts [62.63504976810927]
  We propose methods to facilitate identification of training data artifacts. We show that this proposed training-feature attribution approach can be used to uncover artifacts in training data. We execute a small user study to evaluate whether these methods are useful to NLP researchers in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T09:26:13Z)
• Parrot: Data-Driven Behavioral Priors for Reinforcement Learning [79.32403825036792]
  We propose a method for pre-training behavioral priors that can capture complex input-output relationships observed in successful trials. We show how this learned prior can be used for rapidly learning new tasks without impeding the RL agent's ability to try out novel behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T18:47:40Z)
• Probabilistic Active Meta-Learning [15.432006404678981]
  We introduce task selection based on prior experience into a meta-learning algorithm. We provide empirical evidence that our approach improves data-efficiency when compared to strong baselines on simulated robotic experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T12:51:42Z)
• Learning Reward Functions from Diverse Sources of Human Feedback: Optimally Integrating Demonstrations and Preferences [14.683631546064932]
  We present a framework to integrate multiple sources of information, which are either passively or actively collected from human users. In particular, we present an algorithm that first utilizes user demonstrations to initialize a belief about the reward function, and then actively probes the user with preference queries to zero-in on their true reward. Our approach accounts for the human's ability to provide data: yielding user-friendly preference queries which are also theoretically optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T22:45:27Z)
• Bayesian active learning for production, a systematic study and a reusable library [85.32971950095742]
  In this paper, we analyse the main drawbacks of current active learning techniques. We do a systematic study on the effects of the most common issues of real-world datasets on the deep active learning process. We derive two techniques that can speed up the active learning loop such as partial uncertainty sampling and larger query size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T14:51:11Z)
• Data-driven Koopman Operators for Model-based Shared Control of Human-Machine Systems [66.65503164312705]
  We present a data-driven shared control algorithm that can be used to improve a human operator's control of complex machines. Both the dynamics and information about the user's interaction are learned from observation through the use of a Koopman operator. We find that model-based shared control significantly improves task and control metrics when compared to a natural learning, or user only, control paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T14:14:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.