HonestBait: Forward References for Attractive but Faithful Headline Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14828v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 16:34:37 GMT
• Title: HonestBait: Forward References for Attractive but Faithful Headline Generation
• Authors: Chih-Yao Chen, Dennis Wu, Lun-Wei Ku
• Abstract summary: Forward references (FRs) are a writing technique often used for clickbait. A self-verification process is included during training to avoid spurious inventions. We present PANCO1, an innovative dataset containing pairs of fake news with verified news for attractive but faithful news headline generation.
• Score: 13.456581900511873
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Current methods for generating attractive headlines often learn directly from data, which bases attractiveness on the number of user clicks and views. Although clicks or views do reflect user interest, they can fail to reveal how much interest is raised by the writing style and how much is due to the event or topic itself. Also, such approaches can lead to harmful inventions by over-exaggerating the content, aggravating the spread of false information. In this work, we propose HonestBait, a novel framework for solving these issues from another aspect: generating headlines using forward references (FRs), a writing technique often used for clickbait. A self-verification process is included during training to avoid spurious inventions. We begin with a preliminary user study to understand how FRs affect user interest, after which we present PANCO1, an innovative dataset containing pairs of fake news with verified news for attractive but faithful news headline generation. Automatic metrics and human evaluations show that our framework yields more attractive results (+11.25% compared to human-written verified news headlines) while maintaining high veracity, which helps promote real information to fight against fake news.

Related papers

• Prompt-and-Align: Prompt-Based Social Alignment for Few-Shot Fake News Detection [50.07850264495737]
  "Prompt-and-Align" (P&A) is a novel prompt-based paradigm for few-shot fake news detection. We show that P&A sets new states-of-the-art for few-shot fake news detection performance by significant margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:19:43Z)
• TieFake: Title-Text Similarity and Emotion-Aware Fake News Detection [15.386007761649251]
  We propose a novel Title-Text similarity and emotion-aware Fake news detection (TieFake) method by jointly modeling the multi-modal context information and the author sentiment. Specifically, we employ BERT and ResNeSt to learn the representations for text and images, and utilize publisher emotion extractor to capture the author's subjective emotion in the news content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T04:47:36Z)
• Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded Training Data Generation [105.20743048379387]
  We propose a novel framework for generating training examples informed by the known styles and strategies of human-authored propaganda. Specifically, we perform self-critical sequence training guided by natural language inference to ensure the validity of the generated articles. Our experimental results show that fake news detectors trained on PropaNews are better at detecting human-written disinformation by 3.62 - 7.69% F1 score on two public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T14:24:19Z)
• User Preference-aware Fake News Detection [61.86175081368782]
  Existing fake news detection algorithms focus on mining news content for deceptive signals. We propose a new framework, UPFD, which simultaneously captures various signals from user preferences by joint content and graph modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T21:19:24Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News [57.9843300852526]
  We introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study experiments, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visual-semantic inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T14:13:15Z)
• Machine Learning Explanations to Prevent Overtrust in Fake News Detection [64.46876057393703]
  This research investigates the effects of an Explainable AI assistant embedded in news review platforms for combating the propagation of fake news. We design a news reviewing and sharing interface, create a dataset of news stories, and train four interpretable fake news detection algorithms. For a deeper understanding of Explainable AI systems, we discuss interactions between user engagement, mental model, trust, and performance measures in the process of explaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T05:42:29Z)
• BaitWatcher: A lightweight web interface for the detection of incongruent news headlines [27.29585619643952]
  BaitWatcher is a lightweight web interface that guides readers in estimating the likelihood of incongruence in news articles before clicking on the headlines. BaiittWatcher utilizes a hierarchical recurrent encoder that efficiently learns complex textual representations of a news headline and its associated body text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T23:43:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.