Your Attack Is Too DUMB: Formalizing Attacker Scenarios for Adversarial Transferability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15363v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:21:27 GMT
• Title: Your Attack Is Too DUMB: Formalizing Attacker Scenarios for Adversarial Transferability
• Authors: Marco Alecci, Mauro Conti, Francesco Marchiori, Luca Martinelli, Luca Pajola
• Abstract summary: Evasion attacks are a threat to machine learning models, where adversaries attempt to affect classifiers by injecting malicious samples. We propose the DUMB attacker model, which allows analyzing if evasion attacks fail to transfer when the training conditions of surrogate and victim models differ. Our analysis, which generated 13K tests over 14 distinct attacks, led to numerous novel findings in the scope of transferable attacks with surrogate models.
• Score: 17.899587145780817
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evasion attacks are a threat to machine learning models, where adversaries attempt to affect classifiers by injecting malicious samples. An alarming side-effect of evasion attacks is their ability to transfer among different models: this property is called transferability. Therefore, an attacker can produce adversarial samples on a custom model (surrogate) to conduct the attack on a victim's organization later. Although literature widely discusses how adversaries can transfer their attacks, their experimental settings are limited and far from reality. For instance, many experiments consider both attacker and defender sharing the same dataset, balance level (i.e., how the ground truth is distributed), and model architecture. In this work, we propose the DUMB attacker model. This framework allows analyzing if evasion attacks fail to transfer when the training conditions of surrogate and victim models differ. DUMB considers the following conditions: Dataset soUrces, Model architecture, and the Balance of the ground truth. We then propose a novel testbed to evaluate many state-of-the-art evasion attacks with DUMB; the testbed consists of three computer vision tasks with two distinct datasets each, four types of balance levels, and three model architectures. Our analysis, which generated 13K tests over 14 distinct attacks, led to numerous novel findings in the scope of transferable attacks with surrogate models. In particular, mismatches between attackers and victims in terms of dataset source, balance levels, and model architecture lead to non-negligible loss of attack performance.

Related papers

• Downstream Transfer Attack: Adversarial Attacks on Downstream Models with Pre-trained Vision Transformers [95.22517830759193]
  This paper studies the transferability of such an adversarial vulnerability from a pre-trained ViT model to downstream tasks. We show that DTA achieves an average attack success rate (ASR) exceeding 90%, surpassing existing methods by a huge margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T08:07:03Z)
• Unified Physical-Digital Face Attack Detection [66.14645299430157]
  Face Recognition (FR) systems can suffer from physical (i.e., print photo) and digital (i.e., DeepFake) attacks. Previous related work rarely considers both situations at the same time. We propose a Unified Attack Detection framework based on Vision-Language Models (VLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T09:38:44Z)
• Can Adversarial Examples Be Parsed to Reveal Victim Model Information? [62.814751479749695]
  In this work, we ask whether it is possible to infer data-agnostic victim model (VM) information from data-specific adversarial instances. We collect a dataset of adversarial attacks across 7 attack types generated from 135 victim models. We show that a simple, supervised model parsing network (MPN) is able to infer VM attributes from unseen adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T21:21:49Z)
• MultiRobustBench: Benchmarking Robustness Against Multiple Attacks [86.70417016955459]
  We present the first unified framework for considering multiple attacks against machine learning (ML) models. Our framework is able to model different levels of learner's knowledge about the test-time adversary. We evaluate the performance of 16 defended models for robustness against a set of 9 different attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T20:26:39Z)
• Adversarial Transfer Attacks With Unknown Data and Class Overlap [19.901933940805684]
  Current transfer attack research has an unrealistic advantage for the attacker. We present the first study of transferring adversarial attacks focusing on the data available to attacker and victim under imperfect settings. This threat model is relevant to applications in medicine, malware, and others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T03:41:34Z)
• Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks against DNNs [31.808770437120536]
  We investigate no-box adversarial examples, where the attacker can neither access the model information or the training set nor query the model. We propose three mechanisms for training with a very small dataset and find that prototypical reconstruction is the most effective. Our approach significantly diminishes the average prediction accuracy of the system to only 15.40%, which is on par with the attack that transfers adversarial examples from a pre-trained Arcface model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T11:10:03Z)
• Learning to Attack: Towards Textual Adversarial Attacking in Real-world Situations [81.82518920087175]
  Adversarial attacking aims to fool deep neural networks with adversarial examples. We propose a reinforcement learning based attack model, which can learn from attack history and launch attacks more efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T09:12:24Z)
• Adversarial Imitation Attack [63.76805962712481]
  A practical adversarial attack should require as little as possible knowledge of attacked models. Current substitute attacks need pre-trained models to generate adversarial examples. In this study, we propose a novel adversarial imitation attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-28T10:02:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.