DUMB and DUMBer: Is Adversarial Training Worth It in the Real World?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18516v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:16:21 GMT
• Title: DUMB and DUMBer: Is Adversarial Training Worth It in the Real World?
• Authors: Francesco Marchiori, Marco Alecci, Luca Pajola, Mauro Conti,
• Abstract summary: Adversarial examples are small and often imperceptible perturbations crafted to fool machine learning models.<n>Evasion attacks, a form of adversarial attack where input is modified at test time to cause misclassification, are particularly insidious due to their transferability.<n>We introduce DUMBer, an attack framework built on the foundation of the DUMB methodology to evaluate the resilience of adversarially trained models.
• Score: 15.469010487781931
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Adversarial examples are small and often imperceptible perturbations crafted to fool machine learning models. These attacks seriously threaten the reliability of deep neural networks, especially in security-sensitive domains. Evasion attacks, a form of adversarial attack where input is modified at test time to cause misclassification, are particularly insidious due to their transferability: adversarial examples crafted against one model often fool other models as well. This property, known as adversarial transferability, complicates defense strategies since it enables black-box attacks to succeed without direct access to the victim model. While adversarial training is one of the most widely adopted defense mechanisms, its effectiveness is typically evaluated on a narrow and homogeneous population of models. This limitation hinders the generalizability of empirical findings and restricts practical adoption. In this work, we introduce DUMBer, an attack framework built on the foundation of the DUMB (Dataset soUrces, Model architecture, and Balance) methodology, to systematically evaluate the resilience of adversarially trained models. Our testbed spans multiple adversarial training techniques evaluated across three diverse computer vision tasks, using a heterogeneous population of uniquely trained models to reflect real-world deployment variability. Our experimental pipeline comprises over 130k evaluations spanning 13 state-of-the-art attack algorithms, allowing us to capture nuanced behaviors of adversarial training under varying threat models and dataset conditions. Our findings offer practical, actionable insights for AI practitioners, identifying which defenses are most effective based on the model, dataset, and attacker setup.

Related papers

• Sustainable Self-evolution Adversarial Training [51.25767996364584]
  We propose a Sustainable Self-Evolution Adversarial Training (SSEAT) framework for adversarial training defense models.<n>We introduce a continual adversarial defense pipeline to realize learning from various kinds of adversarial examples.<n>We also propose an adversarial data replay module to better select more diverse and key relearning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T08:41:11Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• Resisting Deep Learning Models Against Adversarial Attack Transferability via Feature Randomization [17.756085566366167]
  We propose a feature randomization-based approach that resists eight adversarial attacks targeting deep learning models. Our methodology can secure the target network and resists adversarial attack transferability by over 60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T20:14:12Z)
• Resisting Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networks using Diverse Decision Boundaries [12.312877365123267]
  Deep learning systems are vulnerable to crafted adversarial examples, which may be imperceptible to the human eye, but can lead the model to misclassify. We develop a new ensemble-based solution that constructs defender models with diverse decision boundaries with respect to the original model. We present extensive experimentations using standard image classification datasets, namely MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 against state-of-the-art adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T08:19:26Z)
• Self-Ensemble Adversarial Training for Improved Robustness [14.244311026737666]
  Adversarial training is the strongest strategy against various adversarial attacks among all sorts of defense methods. Recent works mainly focus on developing new loss functions or regularizers, attempting to find the unique optimal point in the weight space. We devise a simple but powerful emphSelf-Ensemble Adversarial Training (SEAT) method for yielding a robust classifier by averaging weights of history models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T01:12:18Z)
• Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness [53.094682754683255]
  We propose a Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack (MAMA) approach to discover stronger attack algorithms automatically. Our method learns the in adversarial attacks parameterized by a recurrent neural network. We develop a model-agnostic training algorithm to improve the ability of the learned when attacking unseen defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T13:54:24Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)
• Learning to Attack: Towards Textual Adversarial Attacking in Real-world Situations [81.82518920087175]
  Adversarial attacking aims to fool deep neural networks with adversarial examples. We propose a reinforcement learning based attack model, which can learn from attack history and launch attacks more efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-19T09:12:24Z)
• Detection Defense Against Adversarial Attacks with Saliency Map [7.736844355705379]
  It is well established that neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which are almost imperceptible on human vision. Existing defenses are trend to harden the robustness of models against adversarial attacks. We propose a novel method combined with additional noises and utilize the inconsistency strategy to detect adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-06T13:57:17Z)
• Regularizers for Single-step Adversarial Training [49.65499307547198]
  We propose three types of regularizers that help to learn robust models using single-step adversarial training methods. Regularizers mitigate the effect of gradient masking by harnessing on properties that differentiate a robust model from that of a pseudo robust model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T09:21:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.