ChatGPT may excel in States Medical Licensing Examination but falters in basic Linear Algebra

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16282v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 15:19:29 GMT
• Title: ChatGPT may excel in States Medical Licensing Examination but falters in basic Linear Algebra
• Authors: Eli Bagno, Thierry Dana-Picard and Shulamit Reches
• Abstract summary: The emergence of ChatGPT has been rapid, and although it has demonstrated positive impacts in certain domains, its influence is not universally advantageous. Our analysis focuses on ChatGPT's capabilities in Mathematics Education, particularly in teaching basic Linear Algebra.
• Score: 2.3204178451683264
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The emergence of ChatGPT has been rapid, and although it has demonstrated positive impacts in certain domains, its influence is not universally advantageous. Our analysis focuses on ChatGPT's capabilities in Mathematics Education, particularly in teaching basic Linear Algebra. While there are instances where ChatGPT delivers accurate and well-motivated answers, it is crucial to recognize numerous cases where it makes significant mathematical errors and fails in logical inference. These occurrences raise concerns regarding the system's genuine understanding of mathematics, as it appears to rely more on visual patterns rather than true comprehension. Additionally, the suitability of ChatGPT as a teacher for students also warrants consideration.

Related papers

• ChatGPT in Linear Algebra: Strides Forward, Steps to Go [1.1060425537315088]
  We reflect the process undertaken by the ChatGPT along the recent year in our area of interest. The question whether this software can be a teaching assistant or even somehow replace the human teacher, is addressed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T07:35:01Z)
• Using ChatGPT for Science Learning: A Study on Pre-service Teachers' Lesson Planning [0.7416846035207727]
  This study analyzed lesson plans developed by 29 pre-service elementary teachers from a Korean university. 14 types of teaching and learning methods/strategies were identified in the lesson plans. The study identified both appropriate and inappropriate use cases of ChatGPT in lesson planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T22:52:04Z)
• ChatGPT as a Math Questioner? Evaluating ChatGPT on Generating Pre-university Math Questions [20.261452062585985]
  Large language models (LLMs) have excelled in many NLP tasks involving logical and arithmetic reasoning. Our analysis is categorized into two main settings: context-aware and context-unaware. Our crawling results in TopicMath, a comprehensive and novel collection of pre-university math curriculums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T06:23:37Z)
• Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
  We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
• Transformative Effects of ChatGPT on Modern Education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots [36.760677949631514]
  ChatGPT was released to provide coherent and useful replies based on analysis of large volumes of data. Our preliminary evaluation concludes that ChatGPT performed differently in each subject area including finance, coding and maths. There are clear drawbacks in its use, such as the possibility of producing inaccurate or false data. Academic regulations and evaluation practices need to be updated, should ChatGPT be used as a tool in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T17:35:57Z)
• ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Models [49.52083248451775]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in NLP. We specifically focus on ChatGPT, a widely used and easily accessible LLM. We conduct a series of experiments on 11 datasets to evaluate ChatGPT's commonsense abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T03:05:43Z)
• Consistency Analysis of ChatGPT [65.268245109828]
  This paper investigates the trustworthiness of ChatGPT and GPT-4 regarding logically consistent behaviour. Our findings suggest that while both models appear to show an enhanced language understanding and reasoning ability, they still frequently fall short of generating logically consistent predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T01:19:01Z)
• Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
  ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)
• Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints [4.438259529250529]
  We conduct the first learning gain evaluation of ChatGPT by comparing the efficacy of its hints with hints authored by human tutors. We find that 70% of hints produced by ChatGPT passed our manual quality checks and that both human and ChatGPT conditions produced positive learning gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T07:20:48Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.