A Meta-Learning Method for Estimation of Causal Excursion Effects to Assess Time-Varying Moderation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16297v2
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:04:03 GMT
- Title: A Meta-Learning Method for Estimation of Causal Excursion Effects to Assess Time-Varying Moderation
- Authors: Jieru Shi, Walter Dempsey,
- Abstract summary: This paper revisits the estimation of causal excursion effects from a meta-learner perspective.
We present the properties of the proposed estimators and compare them both theoretically and through extensive simulations.
The results show relative efficiency gains and support the suggestion of a doubly robust alternative to existing methods.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Twin revolutions in wearable technologies and health interventions delivered by smartphones have greatly increased the accessibility of mobile health (mHealth) interventions. Micro-randomized trials (MRTs) are designed to assess the effectiveness of the mHealth intervention and introduce a novel class of causal estimands called "causal excursion effects." These estimands enable the evaluation of how intervention effects change over time and are influenced by individual characteristics or context. However, existing analysis methods for causal excursion effects require prespecified features of the observed high-dimensional history to build a working model for a critical nuisance parameter. Machine learning appears ideal for automatic feature construction, but their naive application can lead to bias under model misspecification. To address this issue, this paper revisits the estimation of causal excursion effects from a meta-learner perspective, where the analyst remains agnostic to the supervised learning algorithms used to estimate nuisance parameters. We present the bidirectional asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators and compare them both theoretically and through extensive simulations. The results show relative efficiency gains and support the suggestion of a doubly robust alternative to existing methods. Finally, the proposed methods' practical utilities are demonstrated by analyzing data from a multi-institution cohort of first-year medical residents in the United States (NeCamp et al., 2020).
Related papers
- Seeing Unseen: Discover Novel Biomedical Concepts via
Geometry-Constrained Probabilistic Modeling [53.7117640028211]
We present a geometry-constrained probabilistic modeling treatment to resolve the identified issues.
We incorporate a suite of critical geometric properties to impose proper constraints on the layout of constructed embedding space.
A spectral graph-theoretic method is devised to estimate the number of potential novel classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T00:56:05Z) - Targeted Machine Learning for Average Causal Effect Estimation Using the
Front-Door Functional [3.0232957374216953]
evaluating the average causal effect (ACE) of a treatment on an outcome often involves overcoming the challenges posed by confounding factors in observational studies.
Here, we introduce novel estimation strategies for the front-door criterion based on the targeted minimum loss-based estimation theory.
We demonstrate the applicability of these estimators to analyze the effect of early stage academic performance on future yearly income.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z) - Efficient estimation of weighted cumulative treatment effects by
double/debiased machine learning [3.086361225427304]
We propose a class of one-step cross-fitted double/debiased machine learning estimators for the weighted cumulative causal effect.
We apply the proposed methods to real-world observational data from a UK primary care database to compare the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on cancer outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-03T18:19:18Z) - Causal Inference under Data Restrictions [0.0]
This dissertation focuses on modern causal inference under uncertainty and data restrictions.
It includes applications to neoadjuvant clinical trials, distributed data networks, and robust individualized decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-20T20:14:32Z) - Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of
Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem.
Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools.
We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z) - Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average
treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system.
This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions.
We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z) - SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event
Data [83.50281440043241]
We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data.
We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z) - Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions.
We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects.
The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z) - Estimating Individual Treatment Effects using Non-Parametric Regression
Models: a Review [0.0]
We introduce the setup and the issues related to conducting causal inference with observational or non-fully randomized data.
We develop a unifying taxonomy of the existing state-of-the-art frameworks that allow for individual treatment effects estimation.
We conclude by demonstrating the use of some of the methods on an empirical analysis of the school meal program data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-14T14:26:55Z) - Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit
estimators [77.34726150561087]
Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties.
We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE)
When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z) - Interpretable Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning by
Highlighting Influential Transitions [48.91284724066349]
Off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning offers the chance of using observational data to improve future outcomes in domains such as healthcare and education.
Traditional measures such as confidence intervals may be insufficient due to noise, limited data and confounding.
We develop a method that could serve as a hybrid human-AI system, to enable human experts to analyze the validity of policy evaluation estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T00:26:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.