The distribution of discourse relations within and across turns in spontaneous conversation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03645v1
• Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 15:06:31 GMT
• Title: The distribution of discourse relations within and across turns in spontaneous conversation
• Authors: S. Magal\'i L\'opez Cortez, Cassandra L. Jacobs
• Abstract summary: Time pressure and topic negotiation may impose constraints on how people leverage discourse relations. We adapt a system of DRs for written language to spontaneous dialogue using crowdsourced annotations from novice annotators.
• Score: 13.053424646592749
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Time pressure and topic negotiation may impose constraints on how people leverage discourse relations (DRs) in spontaneous conversational contexts. In this work, we adapt a system of DRs for written language to spontaneous dialogue using crowdsourced annotations from novice annotators. We then test whether discourse relations are used differently across several types of multi-utterance contexts. We compare the patterns of DR annotation within and across speakers and within and across turns. Ultimately, we find that different discourse contexts produce distinct distributions of discourse relations, with single-turn annotations creating the most uncertainty for annotators. Additionally, we find that the discourse relation annotations are of sufficient quality to predict from embeddings of discourse units.

Related papers

• Analysing Cross-Speaker Convergence in Face-to-Face Dialogue through the Lens of Automatically Detected Shared Linguistic Constructions [4.216085185442862]
  This study applies a methodology for automatically detecting shared lemmatised constructions to a referential communication corpus. Our analyses uncover the usage patterns of shared constructions in interaction and reveal that features such as their frequency and the amount of different constructions used for a referent are associated with the degree of object labelling convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T12:34:25Z)
• Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis [3.3436261794502657]
  We show that communicative feedback is markedly less frequent in subtitles than in spontaneous dialogues. We also show that dialogues generated by standard LLMs lie much closer to scripted dialogues than spontaneous interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T13:45:38Z)
• Incorporating Annotator Uncertainty into Representations of Discourse Relations [12.110722011252681]
  We find that dialogue context is a significant predictor of confidence scores. We show that weighting discourse relation representations with information about confidence and dialogue context coherently models our annotators' uncertainty about discourse relation labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T14:39:02Z)
• Revisiting Conversation Discourse for Dialogue Disentanglement [88.3386821205896]
  We propose enhancing dialogue disentanglement by taking full advantage of the dialogue discourse characteristics. We develop a structure-aware framework to integrate the rich structural features for better modeling the conversational semantic context. Our work has great potential to facilitate broader multi-party multi-thread dialogue applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T19:17:47Z)
• Channel-aware Decoupling Network for Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension [81.47133615169203]
  We propose compositional learning for holistic interaction across utterances beyond the sequential contextualization from PrLMs. We employ domain-adaptive training strategies to help the model adapt to the dialogue domains. Experimental results show that our method substantially boosts the strong PrLM baselines in four public benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T13:18:25Z)
• Back to the Future: Bidirectional Information Decoupling Network for Multi-turn Dialogue Modeling [80.51094098799736]
  We propose Bidirectional Information Decoupling Network (BiDeN) as a universal dialogue encoder. BiDeN explicitly incorporates both the past and future contexts and can be generalized to a wide range of dialogue-related tasks. Experimental results on datasets of different downstream tasks demonstrate the universality and effectiveness of our BiDeN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T03:51:46Z)
• Conversational speech recognition leveraging effective fusion methods for cross-utterance language modeling [12.153618111267514]
  We put forward disparate conversation history fusion methods for language modeling in automatic speech recognition. A novel audio-fusion mechanism is introduced, which manages to fuse and utilize the acoustic embeddings of a current utterance and the semantic content of its corresponding conversation history. To flesh out our ideas, we frame the ASR N-best hypothesis rescoring task as a prediction problem, leveraging BERT, an iconic pre-trained LM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T09:07:23Z)
• Who says like a style of Vitamin: Towards Syntax-Aware DialogueSummarization using Multi-task Learning [2.251583286448503]
  We focus on the association between utterances from individual speakers and unique syntactic structures. Speakers have unique textual styles that can contain linguistic information, such as voiceprint. We employ multi-task learning of both syntax-aware information and dialogue summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T05:30:39Z)
• "How Robust r u?": Evaluating Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems on Spoken Conversations [87.95711406978157]
  This work presents a new benchmark on spoken task-oriented conversations. We study multi-domain dialogue state tracking and knowledge-grounded dialogue modeling. Our data set enables speech-based benchmarking of task-oriented dialogue systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T04:51:04Z)
• Towards Modelling Coherence in Spoken Discourse [48.80477600384429]
  Coherence in spoken discourse is dependent on the prosodic and acoustic patterns in speech. We model coherence in spoken discourse with audio-based coherence models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-31T20:18:29Z)
• Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction [53.2896545819799]
  We present the first human-annotated dialogue-based relation extraction (RE) dataset DialogRE. We argue that speaker-related information plays a critical role in the proposed task, based on an analysis of similarities and differences between dialogue-based and traditional RE tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that a speaker-aware extension on the best-performing model leads to gains in both the standard and conversational evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T03:51:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.